Teh Politics Forum Rumors and lies and Teh Iraqi Info Minister and much much more...
View Poll Results: prop 8
yes
19
28.79%
no
47
71.21%
Voters: 66. You may not vote on this poll

OK... NO or Yes On Prop 8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 10:30 AM
  #361  
jewpac42's Avatar
I don't need more cowbell dammit!
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,203
From: Equally as important as Walter
Car Info: E82
Originally Posted by Hardware89
Christianity has been around for on 2000+
And homosexuality has been around for hundreds of thousands of years.
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 10:30 AM
  #362  
medicSTi's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 9,546
From: Vacaville
Car Info: 2018 STi
Originally Posted by jewpac42
If you are going to quote the bible do not do so selectively, there are plenty of passages where god condones homsexuality, if not even outright endorseing it. If you are going to take the word of the bible as a guide as to how to live your life then you better accumulate several more wives, some slaves and start farming. The bible is a book of stories intended to be interpreted as to how to lead a righteous life, the words have been twisted and tainted to promote the message of bigots, which is exactly what god and the bible are intended to be against. Hide behind the veil of religion if you so choose but that doesn't make your beliefs any less hateful or bigoted.
Goodness, will you please fast forward three days. i comend you for reading this whole thread but you are spewing garbage and things that have already been answered.

Step up to the plate and start answering the questions I gave you.
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 10:32 AM
  #363  
medicSTi's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 9,546
From: Vacaville
Car Info: 2018 STi
Originally Posted by jewpac42
Marriage and committed relationships. So regardless of whether or not gays can marry, since they will be in committed relationships the subject must still be taught in schools. The piece of legislation you posted nullifies your argument.
You aren't getting the argument are you? I don't care if they teach Unions, I don't want them teaching that gays can marry because I believe that is between a man and a woman. Please try to understand the argument.
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 10:33 AM
  #364  
medicSTi's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 9,546
From: Vacaville
Car Info: 2018 STi
Originally Posted by jewpac42
No, they will teach children to respect marriage, regardless of whether it is between a man and a woman or a same sex marriage. They are not teaching it is right or wrong, but to respect those who have chose to spend their lives together in happiness.
By calling gay union marriage it proclaims that it is inherently right because marriage is inherently right.
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 10:34 AM
  #365  
jewpac42's Avatar
I don't need more cowbell dammit!
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,203
From: Equally as important as Walter
Car Info: E82
Originally Posted by medicSTi
Are you saying that you believe marriage is not a religious ceremony?
Its not a belief, marriage is not a religious ceremony first and foremost, it is a legal ceremony. Some choose to make it a religious ceremony, but that does not mean marriage is first and foremost a religious ceremony.
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 10:35 AM
  #366  
medicSTi's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 9,546
From: Vacaville
Car Info: 2018 STi
I'll be back when you are done spewing the mud that's already been discussed and catch up three days. When you post your answers to my questions Because I am looking forward to hearing what you've got to say, with no spin.
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 10:35 AM
  #367  
jewpac42's Avatar
I don't need more cowbell dammit!
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,203
From: Equally as important as Walter
Car Info: E82
Originally Posted by RussB
hmm. i'll have to inquire with my accountant next year when doing my taxes. every time i've tried it myself, married - joint seems to get the best returns, but it's still less than if we were not married.




the medical benefits topic was brought up in this thread, my response is that regardless of actually being married, a committed couple can share medical benefits through one partners employer.
Only if the employer so chooses to do so. Don't forget, we live in the bay area, where people and companies tend to be liberal and exptend those benefits voluntarily.
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 10:36 AM
  #368  
jewpac42's Avatar
I don't need more cowbell dammit!
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,203
From: Equally as important as Walter
Car Info: E82
Originally Posted by medicSTi
Should people be able to include themselves in someone elses' tradition to include themselves if it alters the tradtion itself?
Based on your argument, since I am agnostic, I should not be allowed to marry.
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 10:40 AM
  #369  
jewpac42's Avatar
I don't need more cowbell dammit!
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,203
From: Equally as important as Walter
Car Info: E82
Originally Posted by Salty
Although I do not agree with most of the against arguments I do get sick and tired of the elitist "So, you're a bigot then?" remarks. What about one's right to be completely appalled and disgusted with the idea? They have a voice too and shouldn't be chastised for their votable position on the measure.
big⋅ot   /ˈbɪgət/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [big-uht] Show IPA Pronunciation

–noun a person who is utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief, or opinion.

Based on the definition of bigot those who hate gays for no reason other than the fact they are gay are indeed bigots.
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 10:43 AM
  #370  
jewpac42's Avatar
I don't need more cowbell dammit!
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,203
From: Equally as important as Walter
Car Info: E82
Originally Posted by HellaDumb
Don't be ignorant. There were many studies about androgen factors and multiple male births, and diet pill exposures leading to this birth defect. The reason why scientists really don't want to touch this subject is due to the militant nature of this vocal minority.

Do you think prenatal treatment, monitoring, or aborting gay fetuses wouldn't be a factor? While our society tolerates gays, our society wouldn't tolerate vaccinating against gayness.

Plus, just think of what it would due to the fashion industry.
You are calling being gay a birth defect? I agree it is a genetic mutation, but it is not a defect. There is nothing wrong with being gay, it is a perfectly natural way of life and your argument sounds an awful lot like the one made to the german people by Hitler in reference to the Jews.
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 10:45 AM
  #371  
jewpac42's Avatar
I don't need more cowbell dammit!
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,203
From: Equally as important as Walter
Car Info: E82
Originally Posted by medicSTi
How is a yes vote against equal rights? How does one decide that a homosexual couple should have the right to marry or not marry? And how does one then, in fairness, determine the difference between allowing everyone to choose who they want to marry and just homo/heterosexuals?

For example, mormons wanting multiple marriages or maybe some others wanting incestious marriage? Inherently, following the some line of thinking and argument of "let people marry who they want" it would definitely be discrimination to allow these groups not to marry who they want like everyone else.

Good answer please
A yes vote denys the ability of gays to get married which in turn denys them the rights married couples are entitled to, such as filing joint tax returns, being listed as a spouse on medical benefit documents and the right to adopt and raise children.

I am against incestuous marriage based on scientific evidence showing negative affects to offspring. And if mormons want to have several wives, and all parties involved are OK with it, who am I to tell them they cannot?
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 10:48 AM
  #372  
jewpac42's Avatar
I don't need more cowbell dammit!
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,203
From: Equally as important as Walter
Car Info: E82
Originally Posted by medicSTi
So is it okay to have a problem with gay marriage for no reason? Or maybe some other reasons, but not because of the belief some may hold in God?

Answers please
You can be against gay mariage for religious reasons if you so please, however you cannot use your beliefs to deny people rights they are entitled to by the constituion of both California and the United States of America.
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 10:49 AM
  #373  
FW Motorsports's Avatar
iClub Silver Vendor
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,494
From: Participating in some Anarchy!
Car Info: 2005 LGT wagon
Originally Posted by jewpac42
Where did I say it was a constitutional right? I said it was a human right. Also, I guess you have failed to read the pre-amble where it declares we are all entitled to the unalienable right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
Human Right is not the same as a Constitutional Right.
Case in point: I really love another woman, I'm married to my wife(who, btw, would like another woman) yet we can't get married.
Is that fair?

No, it's not.

Originally Posted by jewpac42
The benefits your partner is entitled to when you are married, such as health care through work and tax benefits.
California law, I believe, allows homosexuals/domestic partners to receive employer provided benefits.
If it doesn't, it should.

Originally Posted by jewpac42
That is one of the most ignorant arguments I have ever heard in my entire life. Allowing gay people to marry will not mean all of the sudden brothers will be getting married, or that dogs and people will be getting married. First of all, an animal can never marry a person if for no other reason than they cannot legally consent to such a thing, they cannot sign the marriage license so it is an impossibility. Secondly, science has shown the negative results of those who are related being married and pro-creating. That is a ridiculous argument and anyone with any sort of education should know better than to make a moronic case such as that.
Calm down.

OK, you got me on the animal marriage.

But let's look at the "science" of marriage and procreation.
Please explain how two homosexual men or two homosexual women can reproduce?

Originally Posted by jewpac42
And didn't the supreme court over turn that?
So if the Supreme Court overturns Prop 8, what will you say?

Originally Posted by jewpac42
They are oppressed more, unlike a girlfriend/boyfriend, they do not have the ability to get married and receive the legal and tax benefits afforded to the boyfriend/girlfriend if they so choose to get married.
I think you're wrong, but I just don't know California law regarding domestic partnerships.

Originally Posted by jewpac42
Why is it wrong and why shouldn't they be allowed to raise children?
Why is it right?
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 10:50 AM
  #374  
FW Motorsports's Avatar
iClub Silver Vendor
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,494
From: Participating in some Anarchy!
Car Info: 2005 LGT wagon
Originally Posted by jewpac42
You can be against gay marriage for religious reasons if you so please, however you cannot use your beliefs to deny people rights they are entitled to by the Constitution of both California and the United States of America.
What rights!?!?
Everyone keeps mentioning "rights", but don't elaborate.
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 10:52 AM
  #375  
jewpac42's Avatar
I don't need more cowbell dammit!
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,203
From: Equally as important as Walter
Car Info: E82
Originally Posted by medicSTi
Jewpac42, just in case you missed your opportunity to teach everyone about God supporting homosexuality in the Bible, I'll remind you of your opportunity
Believe it or not, I actually do have to work and do other things. I dont have time to go find my notes from my bible as literature course and reference these specific passages to you, but believe me, they are there. Such as when I believe it is Joshua us wrestling with an angel and their feet touch. Feet is a biblical reference to male genetalia, just like the word know is a biblical reference to sex.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:15 PM.