Teh Politics Forum Rumors and lies and Teh Iraqi Info Minister and much much more...
View Poll Results: prop 8
yes
19
28.79%
no
47
71.21%
Voters: 66. You may not vote on this poll

OK... NO or Yes On Prop 8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 03:45 PM
  #76  
jewpac42's Avatar
I don't need more cowbell dammit!
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,203
From: Equally as important as Walter
Car Info: E82
Originally Posted by karis119
Nice job, picking out one thing and twisting my words. Marriage in my mind is a religious thing, but under the law I think a civil union is more appropriate for anyone. If someone wants to be married by their church that should be a separate issue and a civil union is how it should be recognized under law for anyone, gay, or straight. So, in conclusion, no I DID not say you shouldn't be allowed to marry so stfu and stop being an ***.
So its OK for me to be married by a judge becuase I am straight and not religious, but if I were gay and religious it would not be OK? You said marriage should be a religious thing, that was your argument, right? So how did I pick apart one thing you said? I made an intelligent argument to counter your argument then you come out calling me an *** becuase my argument is coherent?
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 03:46 PM
  #77  
scoo*B's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,038
From: CoCo....or tahoe!
Car Info: 07 specB
Originally Posted by R-Dub

Such blatant hate mongering I have never experienced. This is almost as bad as what the blacks of this country had to go through just to say they were 'equal'.
ya and look what "affirmative action" got us...YES ON 8
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 03:50 PM
  #78  
karis119's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 213
From: bay area
Car Info: 05 STI
Originally Posted by jewpac42
So its OK for me to be married by a judge becuase I am straight and not religious, but if I were gay and religious it would not be OK? You said marriage should be a religious thing, that was your argument, right? So how did I pick apart one thing you said? I made an intelligent argument to counter your argument then you come out calling me an *** becuase my argument is coherent?
Your still missing my point completely, learn to READ. I think their should be civil unions for all, gay, straight, religious, non-religious, just that is how it should be looked at under the law. So there is no discrimination based on anything. Marriage I do not think needs to be recognized under law and can be recognized by your church. Civil unions as they stand right now are a joke and the whole civil union thing would need to be fixed to provide the same benefits as marriage, but just call it that instead. If your not religious, then why would you care if it was called a marriage or civil union? Call it a civil union and keep everyone happy. But again, this is my opinion, you don't have to agree, but don't try and twist my words.
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 03:50 PM
  #79  
ryball's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 17,617
From: pew, pew, pew!!!
Car Info: nonplussed
This is ridiculous. We are voting to TAKE RIGHTS AWAY. Is that what America is, now?

Marriage is not a word or a right that only belongs to people of certain religions. It is something that everyone should have the right to... religious views aside.

I just don't see how this harms anyone. I think people should be allowed to do whatever makes them happy as long as it doesn't harm other people.

It just drives me crazy when people say that it erodes "traditional" marriage. HOW? Is your faith and your marriage so weak that people living contrary to your opinion ERODES your marriage... dilutes or makes your marriage less strong or meaningful.

Ridiculous.

Last edited by ryball; Oct 24, 2008 at 03:55 PM.
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 03:51 PM
  #80  
joltdudeuc's Avatar
Old School
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 14,983
From: Union City
Car Info: '99 RBP GM6
Originally Posted by karis119
Yes on Prop 8. Personally, I agree with the person on the first page who said it should be a civil union and have people get married from their church. That way religious people can be married if they chose to do so and gays can chose to do so as a civil union. The whole system needs to be fixed in my opinion. Personally, I don't have a problem with gays or anyone, what someone does in their bedroom is their own business. However, I do have a problem with someone shoving their beliefs down my throat, which is what happens on both sides of this proposition. What should happen is civil unions need to have the same benefits as marriage that way gay, straight, whatever can be together in a committed relationship and those who want to be married can do so through a church. But let the people speak, I don't think it was right how four people decided to change a law that should have been voted on in the first place. So at least now, majority can decide what California wants, which is the point of democracy.
Would you then support the legal status of marriage in the state (and the country ie: IRS) to be change completely and officially to civil unions?

Cause the issue is this:

marriage is a legal deal. IRS, marriage certificates... this dictates certain rights and taxes and other things.

Prop 8 is about religious folks wanting the government to do something about gay marriage , NOT the other way around. There is nothing that says that a church can't refuse to marry a gay couple, cause they can, i mean, the gov can't tell you what to believe in. Churches are private non-profits, they don't have to marry gay people.

But the state should allow the marriage of gay people, because it's it's a legal thing, and must do so for the sake of equality.
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 03:51 PM
  #81  
Shayhan27's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,127
From: Livermore
Car Info: LUMPY CGM 05 WRX
Originally Posted by R-Dub
Because Prop 8 is about taking away equality. And a vote against it is a vote for equality.
Its about equality for homosexuals. They have every god given right I do with the exception of marraige. So in reality that word "marraige" is what this is all about. I keep having a mental flash of Gavin Newsome saying "Its here weather you like it or not." Well I dont. I do not like having Homosexuality shoved down my throat every 5 minutes. I dont agree with it. I do not feel it is morally correct. I am not going to judge homosexuals everyone lives by a different moral code. However Family through marraige needs to be protected. It has far reaching concequences to include the possibility with all the stresses of puberty now having to choose your sexual affiliation. NOTE TO READERS I am again just bringing up possibilitys and throwing out what little my feeble ignorant mind can muster.
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 03:51 PM
  #82  
HongKongBeef's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,330
From: http://www.winning-smiles.com
Car Info: 2016 Red WRX
religion has NOTHING to do with marriage. Neither my wife nor I am religious. That doesn't mean we diddnt have the right to be married.

I don't know why the religious groups are so insecure with homosexuality. There's nothing to be scared of.

NO on 8

Last edited by HongKongBeef; Oct 24, 2008 at 03:54 PM.
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 03:51 PM
  #83  
jewpac42's Avatar
I don't need more cowbell dammit!
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,203
From: Equally as important as Walter
Car Info: E82
Originally Posted by scoo*B
ya and look what "affirmative action" got us...YES ON 8
What exactly does that mean? Affirmative action is just as bad as prop 8, admissions and jobs should be given based on merit, not race.
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 03:52 PM
  #84  
joltdudeuc's Avatar
Old School
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 14,983
From: Union City
Car Info: '99 RBP GM6
Originally Posted by karis119
Nice job, picking out one thing and twisting my words. Marriage in my mind is a religious thing, but under the law I think a civil union is more appropriate for anyone. If someone wants to be married by their church that should be a separate issue and a civil union is how it should be recognized under law for anyone, gay, or straight. So, in conclusion, no I DID not say you shouldn't be allowed to marry so stfu and stop being an ***.
Good to know!

I hope you will ask your local representative to create a bill to change the marriage to civic union then.
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 03:54 PM
  #85  
Shayhan27's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,127
From: Livermore
Car Info: LUMPY CGM 05 WRX
Originally Posted by R-Dub
Obviously it wasn't me who was falling asleep in Biology - either you slept through it or were too busy covering your ears and yelling when we started talking about evolution.
No I was awake in that part did you not catch earlier where I refered to darwin and the fact that if homosexuality was anitomically and biologically correct and ok we will all become hermaphrodites
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 03:55 PM
  #86  
jewpac42's Avatar
I don't need more cowbell dammit!
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,203
From: Equally as important as Walter
Car Info: E82
Originally Posted by karis119
Your still missing my point completely, learn to READ. I think their should be civil unions for all, gay, straight, religious, non-religious, just that is how it should be looked at under the law. So there is no discrimination based on anything. Marriage I do not think needs to be recognized under law and can be recognized by your church. Civil unions as they stand right now are a joke and the whole civil union thing would need to be fixed to provide the same benefits as marriage, but just call it that instead. If your not religious, then why would you care if it was called a marriage or civil union? Call it a civil union and keep everyone happy. But again, this is my opinion, you don't have to agree, but don't try and twist my words.
Marriage keeps everyone happy, its an issue of equality. I should not be disallowed from participating in a marriage becuase I do not participate in organized religion? Marriage is a legal issue, the IRS considers marriage and civil unions differently, so do a lot of companies when it comes to benefits offered to married couples and thise joined in a civil union. Benefits offered on the basis of two people in a civil union are after tax benefits. How do you not understand that marriage is a legal issue, not one of religion.
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 03:56 PM
  #87  
jewpac42's Avatar
I don't need more cowbell dammit!
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,203
From: Equally as important as Walter
Car Info: E82
Originally Posted by Shayhan27
No I was awake in that part did you not catch earlier where I refered to darwin and the fact that if homosexuality was anitomically and biologically correct and ok we will all become hermaphrodites
That is probably the most ignorant thing I have read today, and that says a lot.
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 03:57 PM
  #88  
R-Dub's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,585
From: Los Altos, CA
Car Info: The Latest From WayneTech.
Originally Posted by Shayhan27
No I was awake in that part did you not catch earlier where I refered to darwin and the fact that if homosexuality was anitomically and biologically correct and ok we will all become hermaphrodites
Did you read Origin or Species? I have, and you are completely incorrect.
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 03:57 PM
  #89  
jewpac42's Avatar
I don't need more cowbell dammit!
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,203
From: Equally as important as Walter
Car Info: E82
Originally Posted by Shayhan27
Its about equality for homosexuals. They have every god given right I do with the exception of marraige. So in reality that word "marraige" is what this is all about. I keep having a mental flash of Gavin Newsome saying "Its here weather you like it or not." Well I dont. I do not like having Homosexuality shoved down my throat every 5 minutes. I dont agree with it. I do not feel it is morally correct. I am not going to judge homosexuals everyone lives by a different moral code. However Family through marraige needs to be protected. It has far reaching concequences to include the possibility with all the stresses of puberty now having to choose your sexual affiliation. NOTE TO READERS I am again just bringing up possibilitys and throwing out what little my feeble ignorant mind can muster.
What do you mean choose your sexual orientation? Do you really think it is a choice? Homosexuals are born with an attraction to those of the same sex, they do not choose who they are attracted to, just like you and I do not choose who we are attracted to.
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 03:58 PM
  #90  
joltdudeuc's Avatar
Old School
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 14,983
From: Union City
Car Info: '99 RBP GM6
Originally Posted by Shayhan27
No I was awake in that part did you not catch earlier where I refered to darwin and the fact that if homosexuality was anitomically and biologically correct and ok we will all become hermaphrodites
WTF?


What does attraction have anything to do with whether what gender we are (or both in the case of hermaphrodites).

I'm sorry, but you are not that bright dude. gender is selected at conception, it has nothing to do with hetero or homosexuality.

You get abnormalities due to extra or missing chromosomes.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:46 AM.