Top gears review of GT86

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 28, 2012 | 02:29 PM
  #121  
Heedz's Avatar
Nobody likes the tuna here
iTrader: (51)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 19,779
From: Somewhere San Mateo County, Inside A 911 Ambulance
Car Info: 03 SRP WRX Street Class Prepped, 17 Chevy Duramax
I'm pretty sure different front bushings and caster.
Old Nov 28, 2012 | 02:37 PM
  #122  
G_Ride's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 7,634
From: Campbell, CA
Car Info: Some sort of Subaru
Originally Posted by Heedz
I'm pretty sure different front bushings and caster.
I'm still unsure about whether or not the bushings are different. I highly doubt caster is different.
Old Nov 28, 2012 | 03:22 PM
  #123  
Alliedforces86's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,759
From: Roaming streets of Vacaville
Car Info: FR-S + WRB Bugeye.
I haven't heard anything about bushings being different, or caster. Just spring rates and dampening.
Old Nov 28, 2012 | 03:42 PM
  #124  
slow04wrx's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 5,453
Originally Posted by G_Ride
Just curious, but why are people dummies for being stock? Why is it like having training wheels on having stock tune?

Also, suspension and tires will probably make a car faster in the corners than just more power.

As for those Porsches you mentioned you're forgetting Porsche put in a lot development into the chassis and different engine layouts give different driving characteristics.

It also takes a lot of skill to be fast in a less powerful car. Maintaining momentum is tough to do. It's very rewarding to be able to do so.

There's no hating here. Just different opinions.


Same here. I'd be also curious to see how the GT86, BRZ, and FR-S perform compared to each other since each one has different spring rates and dampening.

My point was improving the stock tune and exhaust nets power but due to the incredibly increased response is easier to drive fast. It's not just about power but power delivery. I feel anyone who chooses to remain on stock tune isn't very credible person as they are newbin it hard. The stock tunes are horrendous are often less safe than a custom Tune running more boost
.
Old Nov 28, 2012 | 04:06 PM
  #125  
G_Ride's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 7,634
From: Campbell, CA
Car Info: Some sort of Subaru
Originally Posted by slow04wrx
My point was improving the stock tune and exhaust nets power but due to the incredibly increased response is easier to drive fast. It's not just about power but power delivery. I feel anyone who chooses to remain on stock tune isn't very credible person as they are newbin it hard. The stock tunes are horrendous are often less safe than a custom Tune running more boost
.
You can still drive really fast with a stock tune. It's called having driving skills. You're forgetting you need suspension to put that power down and keep the tires on the ground, too. How is a person who stays with on a stock tune not credible about being able to drive fast?
Old Nov 28, 2012 | 04:19 PM
  #126  
LxJLthr's Avatar
I survived the Mod Challenge and all I got was this lousy title
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,030
From: In Mother Russia...
Car Info: ...zeh car drives you!
Originally Posted by slow04wrx
My point was improving the stock tune and exhaust nets power but due to the incredibly increased response is easier to drive fast. It's not just about power but power delivery. I feel anyone who chooses to remain on stock tune isn't very credible person as they are newbin it hard. The stock tunes are horrendous are often less safe than a custom Tune running more boost.
Let me get this straight...Stock tune is MORE dangerous? And it is SAFER to crank up the boost? IMHO

I have a '98 Legacy Outback that has **** for power and performance potential compared to pretty much everything (and I won't claim to be the greatest driver either)...yet I don't know how many times I walked away from Corvettes, M3s, 911s, etc on curvy roads because those drivers were clueless as what to do with those vehicles (bigger wallet does not equal bigger driving skill).

Last edited by LxJLthr; Nov 28, 2012 at 04:28 PM.
Old Nov 28, 2012 | 04:22 PM
  #127  
LOL_VTEC's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 5,436
From: Bay Area 925
Car Info: 2018 Tacoma TRD PRO
Originally Posted by LxJLthr
Let me get this straight...Stock tune from is MORE dangerous? And it is SAFER to crank up the boost? IMHO
Well, for some cars yes. 08+ STi's for example. The stock maps are crap.
Old Nov 28, 2012 | 04:33 PM
  #128  
LxJLthr's Avatar
I survived the Mod Challenge and all I got was this lousy title
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,030
From: In Mother Russia...
Car Info: ...zeh car drives you!
Originally Posted by LOL VTEC
Well, for some cars yes. 08+ STi's for example. The stock maps are crap.
I will conceed I haven't cared for the new models, so I don't follow their issues. But define "crap"? Do the engines constantly blow up under normal circumstances or just concervatively tunes because Subaru is trying to appeal to a wider audience?
Old Nov 28, 2012 | 04:59 PM
  #129  
Heedz's Avatar
Nobody likes the tuna here
iTrader: (51)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 19,779
From: Somewhere San Mateo County, Inside A 911 Ambulance
Car Info: 03 SRP WRX Street Class Prepped, 17 Chevy Duramax
Originally Posted by slow04wrx
My point was improving the stock tune and exhaust nets power but due to the incredibly increased response is easier to drive fast. It's not just about power but power delivery. I feel anyone who chooses to remain on stock tune isn't very credible person as they are newbin it hard. The stock tunes are horrendous are often less safe than a custom Tune running more boost
.
I'll be pretty blunt honest here.

I have a tendency to drive faster in the Prius V than any other car I've been in...............

What's not safe? The driver or the engine.......
Engine doesn't count one bit.

Originally Posted by LOL VTEC
Well, for some cars yes. 08+ STi's for example. The stock maps are crap.
No..... 2007 Maps were horrible 08+ just have ****ty piston rings and pistons and a semi lean tune without performance.

But then again.... The legacy's went in for a remap by recall also, they had no ringland failures like the GR/GH chassis does.

But wait. This is completely irrelevant to the topic still.
Old Nov 28, 2012 | 05:03 PM
  #130  
Heedz's Avatar
Nobody likes the tuna here
iTrader: (51)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 19,779
From: Somewhere San Mateo County, Inside A 911 Ambulance
Car Info: 03 SRP WRX Street Class Prepped, 17 Chevy Duramax
If the Prius fast?
No

Does the Prius handle?
No

Does the Prius have a stock ****ty tune?
ERMAHGERD

Point in the making here.
Old Nov 28, 2012 | 05:03 PM
  #131  
G_Ride's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 7,634
From: Campbell, CA
Car Info: Some sort of Subaru
I think the tuning on the later models got worse to meet emissions and made less power. Someone can correct me if I'm wrong.
Old Nov 29, 2012 | 08:59 PM
  #132  
subie OCD's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,808
From: Concord
Car Info: 04 STi
Looks like the BRZ is almost as fast as the Civic Si.
























Name:  stirpot.gif
Views: 11
Size:  44.0 KB
Old Nov 29, 2012 | 09:19 PM
  #133  
Heedz's Avatar
Nobody likes the tuna here
iTrader: (51)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 19,779
From: Somewhere San Mateo County, Inside A 911 Ambulance
Car Info: 03 SRP WRX Street Class Prepped, 17 Chevy Duramax
Civics aren't slow when done right either......

Just that most of them are rice doesn't mean it's a bad platform.
Old Nov 30, 2012 | 08:26 AM
  #134  
wombatsauce's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 7,441
From: Stockholm
Car Info: 2018 Golf R Variant
Originally Posted by subie OCD
Looks like the BRZ is almost as fast as the Civic Si.

2013 Subaru BRZ vs. 2012 Honda Civic Si HFP - YouTube

That's a great review - thank you for sharing! Curious though, it seems by the image you posted that you completely missed the point of it.

I especially liked the parts where the driver says he expected the BRZ to feel underpowered, but was surprised by the engine and furthermore that it is the most balanced sports car you can get for that price point. It's only "interesting" to note that the Civic had higher performance tires on it, and speaks well that the driver of the BRZ was able to keep up with such a dis-advantage. Many people have already talked about the lack of grip of the OEM tires fit to the BRZ.

Civics are awesome track cars by the way. Take a look at NASA's calendar and go spectate at some track days. It's really fun, and you can often get ride alongs with various different drivers to get a feel for how different cars can be versus what you had expected based on reading some specs about the car.
Old Nov 30, 2012 | 08:59 AM
  #135  
Brfatal's Avatar
Technical Know-It-All
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,123
From: Sterling, VA
Car Info: '02 WRX + '15 WRX
The BRZ's stock tires are touring summers. Anything classified a touring tire is going to focus purely on ride quality and noise. Grip is last thing you'll get out of a set of them.

Last edited by Brfatal; Nov 30, 2012 at 09:01 AM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LifePlaza
Rife Plazapalooza
24
Aug 1, 2014 02:07 PM
SkizzDawg
Bay Area
34
Dec 12, 2012 07:08 AM
JourdanWithaU
Bay Area
7
Dec 2, 2012 04:05 AM
brucelee
Bay Area
34
Nov 7, 2008 03:30 PM
BoOm
Hawaii
0
Jul 13, 2003 03:49 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:38 PM.