Top gears review of GT86

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 28, 2012 | 08:18 AM
  #106  
LOL_VTEC's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 5,436
From: Bay Area 925
Car Info: 2018 Tacoma TRD PRO
I drove that FRS too. The white one. The grey one was auto i think. I loved it. I was breaking peoples necks when i was driving that thing around. Every stop light people in thier cars just didnt stop looking at it. Btw, whats the Chain they gabe us do? Its like a USB port but not,


Originally Posted by JourdanWithaU
I think the GT86 is pretty good as it is. I test drove a FR-S at the SF Autoshow and I thought it was great. Granted this is compared to my 2.5i. On paper the FR-S is faster than my car and on the road it felt faster too.

However, my friend who was with me did not share my enthusiasm. He drives a '02 WRX and he said that the FR-S felt almost the same as his WRX.

I think it is also interesting how the GT86 is classed. While the STi is B and the WRX is D, the GT86 is right between the two in C class.

But I agree with G_Ride and wombatsauce, it is much more fun, and rewarding, to be able to get the most out of a slow car than it is to just drive a fast car.
Old Nov 28, 2012 | 09:22 AM
  #107  
wombatsauce's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 7,441
From: Stockholm
Car Info: 2018 Golf R Variant
Originally Posted by Brfatal
My "ancient" Camry is as fast as a stock 2.0L WRX from a roll.

I make ~250% as much power as his stock WRX and I still think mine is slow.
Even a stock '02 WRX is powerful enough to be quite dangerous in the wrong hands, as was proven by the rash of creatively totaled vehicles directly after it was released.

Maybe I am just old I guess. I come from a time when Ferraris had manual transmissions and it would be common for a real sports car to weigh less than a ton, and have not much more than 100hp. I have driven powerful cars and it's neat to feel that rush when you stomp on the loud pedal, but there is nothing in the world like handily out-driving someone using a much less powerful car; instead of 'drag racing' people by pushing on a pedal (where speed = dollars) it would be passing someone simply by out braking or late-braking someone, using things like grip, skill and knowing the limits of one's vehicle. Nothing in the world!

Probably the more powerful cars I have driven were the aforementioned '03 Z06, my old '10 SS/RS M6 Camaro, and my old '93 Celica All-Trac w/ the PAE stroked/built 2.3L. They were fun, to be sure. Weee. Vrooom/Psssshhh. Etc. But taking my ~2400lb '80 Celica coupe w/ maybe 80hp (car cost less than the tires on the Z06, which last one "fast" track day, yes really) to Thunderhill for years and easily passing people in much more capable/powerful cars was a mind-blowing rush I will never forget. Hours on the back roads in a '93 2WD Justy has also been amazing to me, and had a few conversations with people that did not understand how/why this tiny little white tater-tot was keeping up with them.

Point is, cars are fun, we like them, and we all like slightly different things. Personally, I like that, and the corresponding discussion, way more than if we all liked exactly the same thing. Also, my opinion is worth what you all paid for it.

Old Nov 28, 2012 | 09:24 AM
  #108  
Giibo's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,824
From: 650
Car Info: '14 Odyssey & '13 Prius
2 words: SPEC MIATA
Old Nov 28, 2012 | 09:46 AM
  #109  
Brfatal's Avatar
Technical Know-It-All
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,123
From: Sterling, VA
Car Info: '02 WRX + '15 WRX
Wombat, don't get me wrong. A light weight, lower power car can still be fun. Not necessarily even drag racing. It's passing. Pulling out of a parking lot into 55 mph road in traffic. I am well aware that fast has more than one takes and welcomely see the lower power tracking aspects. I was speaking "fast" merely in terms of speed, considering that a stock WRX most definitely not a track monster, quite the opposite. I was pointing out that my 14 yr old every-day-joe car is just as quick. Newer cars are getting faster as the horsepower wars have been restarted. The current Camry is quickly approaching 300 hp. The car I'll be replacing it with at the beginning of the year is 429 hp, though it weighs 2 tons.

Last edited by Brfatal; Nov 28, 2012 at 11:07 AM.
Old Nov 28, 2012 | 09:57 AM
  #110  
JourdanWithaU's Avatar
It's QQ thankyouverymuch
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 19,721
From: San Jose
Car Info: 2011 SWP WRX Hatch
Originally Posted by LOL VTEC
I drove that FRS too. The white one. The grey one was auto i think. I loved it. I was breaking peoples necks when i was driving that thing around. Every stop light people in thier cars just didnt stop looking at it. Btw, whats the Chain they gabe us do? Its like a USB port but not,
I drove the grey one and it was automatic. But it did have paddles which were cool. It still moved pretty good. The wait for the manual was almost 2 hours while the Auto was only 20 minutes. I also took one of the TCs for a spin while my friends drove the FR-S.

The keychain was a USB drive with a whopping 1GB of space.
Old Nov 28, 2012 | 10:10 AM
  #111  
wombatsauce's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 7,441
From: Stockholm
Car Info: 2018 Golf R Variant
Originally Posted by Brfatal
Wombat, don't get me wrong. A light weight, lower power car can still be fun. Not necessarily even drag racing. It's passing. Pulling out of a parking lot at 55 mph road in traffic. I am well aware that fast has more than one takes and welcomely see the lower power tracking aspects. I was speaking "fast" merely in terms of speed, considering that a stock WRX most definitely not a track monster, quite the opposite. I was pointing out that my 14 yr old every-do-joe car is just as quick. Newer cars are getting faster as the horsepower wars have been restarted. The current Camry is quickly approaching 300 hp. The car I'll be replacing it with at the beginning of the year is 429 hp, though it weighs 2 tons.
There is no doubt that we have never had more powerful stock cars on the market, I mean there's 700+hp Mercedes everywhere, 600+hp Mustang, 600+hp Corvette, 500+hp Camaro, etc. I daily drove a stock '10 Camaro SS/RS M6 for around two years and it was fun, but when I would go out for a fun drive on the weekends (lived out on the coast then) I would usually take my Mini or even my Justy once I got it in better tune. Yes, maybe I am insane but I think I am just mildly weird.

Still, when I see someone finally press "send" and then accelerate onto the freeway faster than me in a car that I would never own let alone if I had $100k sitting around, it does not impress me - it just seems like I have experienced another *******, which is nothing new.

When I cannot keep up with someone in a Maxima on HWY 35, then - I am impressed. Again, we all have different points of view, and maybe it would be different for me if I had $100k to toss around on a car. I drove my '10 Camaro but I think my WRX is about as able to out-accelerate folks, if you plan ahead, in most situations (it's not stock, but not crazy at all).

Back in '02-'03 I had my brand new WRX sedan. I couldn't afford much more than the payments but got free track time for working Safety and Tow on weekends at Laguna and Sears. Yes, I dared to do track events in a stock '03 WRX, on RE-92s. When I could afford it, I upgraded the brake pads/fluid (after learning about brake-fade whilst sailing passed a Miata not entirely in control of my vehicle @Laguna), then got some P1's and better tires, springs but still stock struts, good alignment, and eventually Vishnu ECUTEK reflash/dyno tune. I had some serious fun in that car, on race tracks while being baffled by all the "crashed into a tree because my RE-92's took control of my wheel and MAGIC GODHAND/etc" threads at the time. I remember when it was mostly stock and on the RE-92s, you could pretty easily drift the car and blast out of turns. I learned a lot from an instructor who said I would learn a lot more shredding these tires on the track and then upgrading than upgrading right away, even if I could afford it.

I have had some serious fun in rental Camrys over the years and yes they can haul gratuitous amounts of ***, but I would rather take my Bugeye on a track even with my worn-out suspension. I got new tires last week so I have been sliding around a little while they wear in, and it totally reminded me of my stock '03 sedan back then.

Anyway... I understand what you are saying, and I think I understand where you are coming from.
Old Nov 28, 2012 | 11:11 AM
  #112  
Brfatal's Avatar
Technical Know-It-All
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,123
From: Sterling, VA
Car Info: '02 WRX + '15 WRX
You're preaching to the choir. I'm one who will probably be looking at an '80 - early '90s Porsche whenever it comes time to get rid of my WRX. Again, I was referring more to day to day driving habits as opposed to racing.
Old Nov 28, 2012 | 11:21 AM
  #113  
slow04wrx's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 5,453
You guys may think a stock wrx is enough power to get in trouble, but you are a dummy if you are stock. A tune and exhaust will make going fast in corners easier. Stock tunes have incredibly terrible response.

You basically still have your training wheels on if you run stock tunes and exhaust on a subaru.


Do people consider the 911 gt3 cayman r/ boxster s to have too much power and be difficult to drive?


Slow cars are easier to drive fast and easier to accomplish cornering feats in! Did you really just figure this out? Cars without a lot of power don't overpower their chasis and suspension. This doesn't mean a more powerful car can't be incredibly fun to drive. But I guess the BRZ is clearly a crappy chasis for having horsepower, if you want a car to handle well and have power it's much better to start with something that is really heavy and has ****ty suspension. Just kidding.

Bottom line= a more powerful BRZ won't kick the regular BRZ out, so stop hating.
Old Nov 28, 2012 | 12:24 PM
  #114  
subie OCD's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,808
From: Concord
Car Info: 04 STi
Since this a Top Gear review thread, have they taken it around their track? Would love to see how it compares to other cars...
Old Nov 28, 2012 | 12:29 PM
  #115  
JourdanWithaU's Avatar
It's QQ thankyouverymuch
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 19,721
From: San Jose
Car Info: 2011 SWP WRX Hatch
They reviewed it during a special...























Called, "The Worst Car in The History of The World."
Old Nov 28, 2012 | 12:45 PM
  #116  
slugrx's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 7,225
From: SF Bay Area - Peninsula
Car Info: 04 psm wrx sedan
Originally Posted by Brfatal
Again, I was referring more to day to day driving habits as opposed to racing.
That's what I was getting at as well
Old Nov 28, 2012 | 01:14 PM
  #117  
Heedz's Avatar
Nobody likes the tuna here
iTrader: (51)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 19,779
From: Somewhere San Mateo County, Inside A 911 Ambulance
Car Info: 03 SRP WRX Street Class Prepped, 17 Chevy Duramax
Originally Posted by slow04wrx
You guys may think a stock wrx is enough power to get in trouble, but you are a dummy if you are stock. A tune and exhaust will make going fast in corners easier. Stock tunes have incredibly terrible response.

You basically still have your training wheels on if you run stock tunes and exhaust on a subaru.


Do people consider the 911 gt3 cayman r/ boxster s to have too much power and be difficult to drive?
Wut? a tune and exhaust doesn't necessarily make anyone go faster in turns. IE I put my mom in my car with stock everything, then my mom in a fully done car, she's gonna go the same speed.
Old Nov 28, 2012 | 01:28 PM
  #118  
DSav408's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 3,051
From: San Jose, CA
Car Info: 07 UGM FXT
Originally Posted by Heedz

Wut? a tune and exhaust doesn't necessarily make anyone go faster in turns. IE I put my mom in my car with stock everything, then my mom in a fully done car, she's gonna go the same speed.
But you're forgetting the because race car effect...
Old Nov 28, 2012 | 01:31 PM
  #119  
Alliedforces86's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,759
From: Roaming streets of Vacaville
Car Info: FR-S + WRB Bugeye.
Originally Posted by slow04wrx
You guys may think a stock wrx is enough power to get in trouble, but you are a dummy if you are stock. A tune and exhaust will make going fast in corners easier. Stock tunes have incredibly terrible response.

You basically still have your training wheels on if you run stock tunes and exhaust on a subaru.


Do people consider the 911 gt3 cayman r/ boxster s to have too much power and be difficult to drive?


Slow cars are easier to drive fast and easier to accomplish cornering feats in! Did you really just figure this out? Cars without a lot of power don't overpower their chasis and suspension. This doesn't mean a more powerful car can't be incredibly fun to drive. But I guess the BRZ is clearly a crappy chasis for having horsepower, if you want a car to handle well and have power it's much better to start with something that is really heavy and has ****ty suspension. Just kidding.

Bottom line= a more powerful BRZ won't kick the regular BRZ out, so stop hating.
Training wheels?? really? "tuning and exhaust will make you go faster in corners"..

Your whole post was just a slough of crap coming out. The only part that held any weight was about the Porsches.

It sounds like I need to take my GoPro with me next time I drive on the highway to show you guys these cars have the capability of getting on the hwy fast, and being able to pick up speed and pass people.. Come on, it's not a 70's Ford Fiesta here
Old Nov 28, 2012 | 01:51 PM
  #120  
G_Ride's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 7,634
From: Campbell, CA
Car Info: Some sort of Subaru
Originally Posted by slow04wrx
You guys may think a stock wrx is enough power to get in trouble, but you are a dummy if you are stock. A tune and exhaust will make going fast in corners easier. Stock tunes have incredibly terrible response.

You basically still have your training wheels on if you run stock tunes and exhaust on a subaru.


Do people consider the 911 gt3 cayman r/ boxster s to have too much power and be difficult to drive?


Slow cars are easier to drive fast and easier to accomplish cornering feats in! Did you really just figure this out? Cars without a lot of power don't overpower their chasis and suspension. This doesn't mean a more powerful car can't be incredibly fun to drive. But I guess the BRZ is clearly a crappy chasis for having horsepower, if you want a car to handle well and have power it's much better to start with something that is really heavy and has ****ty suspension. Just kidding.

Bottom line= a more powerful BRZ won't kick the regular BRZ out, so stop hating.
Just curious, but why are people dummies for being stock? Why is it like having training wheels on having stock tune?

Also, suspension and tires will probably make a car faster in the corners than just more power.

As for those Porsches you mentioned you're forgetting Porsche put in a lot development into the chassis and different engine layouts give different driving characteristics.

It also takes a lot of skill to be fast in a less powerful car. Maintaining momentum is tough to do. It's very rewarding to be able to do so.

There's no hating here. Just different opinions.

Originally Posted by subie OCD
Since this a Top Gear review thread, have they taken it around their track? Would love to see how it compares to other cars...
Same here. I'd be also curious to see how the GT86, BRZ, and FR-S perform compared to each other since each one has different spring rates and dampening.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:32 AM.