old body vs. new body
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 189
From: Los Angeles
I'm partial to the GC8 style. As "old" and "dated" as it may be, it still grabs the attention of a number of individuals (at least here in CA) who think they know a thing or two about cars, and it's fun listening to these folks make ***** out of themselves trying to "talk the talk."
Guest
Posts: n/a
quote: actually new is more aerodynamic(faster). i beleive it was SCC that tested it at 5.2 for 0-60 in their 8 best sport compacts, which is .2 faster than the fastest 0-60 recorded time for the old ones.
Well the GC8, which is what I was referring to is lighter, and quicker as a WRX than the current car. I should know, I test drove one in England!
Well the GC8, which is what I was referring to is lighter, and quicker as a WRX than the current car. I should know, I test drove one in England!
:banana:
VIP Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,568
From: Rockland County...NY
Car Info: want a WRX
Originally posted by xr4timan
quote: actually new is more aerodynamic(faster). i beleive it was SCC that tested it at 5.2 for 0-60 in their 8 best sport compacts, which is .2 faster than the fastest 0-60 recorded time for the old ones.
Well the GC8, which is what I was referring to is lighter, and quicker as a WRX than the current car. I should know, I test drove one in England!
quote: actually new is more aerodynamic(faster). i beleive it was SCC that tested it at 5.2 for 0-60 in their 8 best sport compacts, which is .2 faster than the fastest 0-60 recorded time for the old ones.
Well the GC8, which is what I was referring to is lighter, and quicker as a WRX than the current car. I should know, I test drove one in England!
and LOL! to your lenscrafter comment.:banana:
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
iLoqin
Bay Area
10
Sep 23, 2009 02:47 PM