good time to get a leftover 06 ?
Something Custom
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,505
From: Las Vegas NV
Car Info: 2018 Grand Cherokee Limited Ecodiesel EOC Stage 1
Originally Posted by ucbsti
lol..I was trying to say the same thing, but his summary made the point much more effectively
Originally Posted by ucbsti
NO!!!
You guys are so hardheaded. Thats 100% DRIVER ERROR then if you enter a corner too fast.
Ill say it again, JUST BECAUSE YOUR CAR HAS XXXX POWER, DOESNT MEAN YOU ALWAYS NEED TO USE IT ALL
You guys are so hardheaded. Thats 100% DRIVER ERROR then if you enter a corner too fast.
Ill say it again, JUST BECAUSE YOUR CAR HAS XXXX POWER, DOESNT MEAN YOU ALWAYS NEED TO USE IT ALL
This is very true. Working safety crew for NASA, you tend to see the results of misinformation in the form of twisted metal and such.
People read car mags, and look at a car's power @ a specific RPM no less, and think of it as an on/off switch. A ____ can beat a ____ in any number of situations based solely on the driver's skill and understanding of the platform he is using. PERIOD. I used to get so frustrated in NASA group3 in my 1980 Celica being held up by new STis and Boxsters. Does this mean underpowered cars are superior? That old beater Celicas are fast4r? No - it means those guys should not have been in Group 3. We have one guy in Group 2 with a new Z06 who would NOT listen to the instructor and eventually plowed his car into the wall on the back straight... Doesn't matter "how fast a car is" or "how well it handles" as long as there is a competent driver behind the wheel.
The biggest problem is people see the throttle as an on/off switch. It's not digital, it's analog!! Most good handling underpowered cars do well because they are momentum cars and force the driver to actually learn how to drive, unlike the Viper drivers in Group2 who putt putt around the corners holding everyone up, then drag race on the straights.
There is zero direct correllation between power and handling. It is ALL about the driver and his ability to control a car.
S2K's handle amazingly well but need a skilled driver as you approach the limit. WRXs are great handlers too but are MUCH more forgiving for a more unskilled driver.
If you are comparing a car's abilities solely on the output of it's engine at a specific RPM, then there is nothing really to talk about there...
Originally Posted by ucbsti
lol..I was trying to say the same thing, but his summary made the point much more effectively
VIP Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,632
From: Yokosuka, Japan
Car Info: 2008 EVO X/1991 Nissan Skyline GT-R32
my point is this, the more power you have, the more suspension and braking components you need. The fact you need to upgrade your brakes and put on new coilovers and swaybars because you have more power means that power does affect handling. They are two different components, but you can not have one without the other.
I understand that a mini or S2000 is built to handle better on a course just like a porsche is compact and built to handle well. but if you take a stock S2000 and then put motor upgrades and no suspension in an S2000 the stock one will handle better because the suspension is set up for the power of the car.
I understand that a mini or S2000 is built to handle better on a course just like a porsche is compact and built to handle well. but if you take a stock S2000 and then put motor upgrades and no suspension in an S2000 the stock one will handle better because the suspension is set up for the power of the car.
Originally Posted by 06WRX4ME
my point is this, the more power you have, the more suspension and braking components you need. The fact you need to upgrade your brakes and put on new coilovers and swaybars because you have more power means that power does affect handling. They are two different components, but you can not have one without the other.
I understand that a mini or S2000 is built to handle better on a course just like a porsche is compact and built to handle well. but if you take a stock S2000 and then put motor upgrades and no suspension in an S2000 the stock one will handle better because the suspension is set up for the power of the car.
I understand that a mini or S2000 is built to handle better on a course just like a porsche is compact and built to handle well. but if you take a stock S2000 and then put motor upgrades and no suspension in an S2000 the stock one will handle better because the suspension is set up for the power of the car.
Just because you have the power, doesnt meant you NEED to upgrade the suspension. You just have to learn how to modulate and correctly use that power (100% driver, 0% car).
First mod-DRIVING SKILLS/classes
Second mod-suspension/brakes/tires (most stock cars motors out perform the stock suspension
third mod-power
Driving skill>>>>>buying parts. Buying aftermarket parts will NOT make you a better driver, it only (in some cases) makes the margain for error larger. IE, they make a a bad driver look not as bad
Please read back the past couple posts, they are informative and 100% correct, because you are completely missing the point right now. If you do upgrade your motor and you want to FULLY use that power, then use you must upgrade (see above about stock engines), but that doesnt mean HAVE to upgrade everything else
If an experienced driver and 2 stock suspension S2ks, one with stock engine, one with mods, he would still be able to go faster in the moded one on the stock suspension
Why? its called driver skill
Last edited by ucbsti; Sep 7, 2006 at 05:35 PM.
VIP Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,632
From: Yokosuka, Japan
Car Info: 2008 EVO X/1991 Nissan Skyline GT-R32
I do agree that skill is needed, but your telling me that if i take an FP Green setup and put it on my 06 WRX and leave everything else stock I will be able to control the power. Your dead wrong. I will need new tires, handling, at the minimum.
i think the confusion for needing better suspension lies in velocity versus power. here's a situation: driver's skill aside, at high velocity, you need better suspension components to navigate through tough corners - this may be true. with more power under the hood, you can get to higher velocity faster (more acceleration), but thats it. with less power under the hood, you can still reach that same exact velocity in less time, but you will still need the same suspension upgrades regardless of horespower. so what brought the car to that velocity??? THE DRIVER!!!
Originally Posted by 06WRX4ME
if you take a stock S2000 and then put motor upgrades and no suspension in an S2000 the stock one will handle better because the suspension is set up for the power of the car.
one simply accelerates faster in a straight line. if you were to optimally navigate a course with both cars, you would enter/exit every corner at the same speed in order fully utilize your driver skill for least time. you can still go fast in the lesser power car.
Originally Posted by 06WRX4ME
I do agree that skill is needed, but your telling me that if i take an FP Green setup and put it on my 06 WRX and leave everything else stock I will be able to control the power. Your dead wrong. I will need new tires, handling, at the minimum.
absurd
dude you're arguing for this:
against this:
i cant even think of anything to say to even sympathize with misinformed people who continue to try to make their point.
maybe we should stop. we are doing a dis-service to vendors everywhere. these are the same people who will buy every suspension/power component available because they think it will make them a better driver. by telling people the truth, people might start taking driving lessons and not get into wrecks. now that just wouldnt be american
Originally Posted by 06WRX4ME
so if your car is capable of more power than you need more suspension so therefore power does affect handling. thanks
Originally Posted by ucbsti
Just because a car's engine is capable of entering a corner at XXX speed, doesnt mean you SHOULD enter at that speed. That corner entry speed determined by the cars chasis/suspension/weight/etc, NOT THE ENGINE
If you want to enter the corner faster (and your car is capable of it), then you obviously need to updrage the suspension/brakes/tires.
If you want to enter the corner faster (and your car is capable of it), then you obviously need to updrage the suspension/brakes/tires.
Originally Posted by wombatsauce
This is very true. Working safety crew for NASA, you tend to see the results of misinformation in the form of twisted metal and such.
People read car mags, and look at a car's power @ a specific RPM no less, and think of it as an on/off switch. A ____ can beat a ____ in any number of situations based solely on the driver's skill and understanding of the platform he is using. PERIOD. I used to get so frustrated in NASA group3 in my 1980 Celica being held up by new STis and Boxsters. Does this mean underpowered cars are superior? That old beater Celicas are fast4r? No - it means those guys should not have been in Group 3. We have one guy in Group 2 with a new Z06 who would NOT listen to the instructor and eventually plowed his car into the wall on the back straight... Doesn't matter "how fast a car is" or "how well it handles" as long as there is a competent driver behind the wheel.
The biggest problem is people see the throttle as an on/off switch. It's not digital, it's analog!! Most good handling underpowered cars do well because they are momentum cars and force the driver to actually learn how to drive, unlike the Viper drivers in Group2 who putt putt around the corners holding everyone up, then drag race on the straights.
There is zero direct correllation between power and handling. It is ALL about the driver and his ability to control a car.
S2K's handle amazingly well but need a skilled driver as you approach the limit. WRXs are great handlers too but are MUCH more forgiving for a more unskilled driver.
If you are comparing a car's abilities solely on the output of it's engine at a specific RPM, then there is nothing really to talk about there...
People read car mags, and look at a car's power @ a specific RPM no less, and think of it as an on/off switch. A ____ can beat a ____ in any number of situations based solely on the driver's skill and understanding of the platform he is using. PERIOD. I used to get so frustrated in NASA group3 in my 1980 Celica being held up by new STis and Boxsters. Does this mean underpowered cars are superior? That old beater Celicas are fast4r? No - it means those guys should not have been in Group 3. We have one guy in Group 2 with a new Z06 who would NOT listen to the instructor and eventually plowed his car into the wall on the back straight... Doesn't matter "how fast a car is" or "how well it handles" as long as there is a competent driver behind the wheel.
The biggest problem is people see the throttle as an on/off switch. It's not digital, it's analog!! Most good handling underpowered cars do well because they are momentum cars and force the driver to actually learn how to drive, unlike the Viper drivers in Group2 who putt putt around the corners holding everyone up, then drag race on the straights.
There is zero direct correllation between power and handling. It is ALL about the driver and his ability to control a car.
S2K's handle amazingly well but need a skilled driver as you approach the limit. WRXs are great handlers too but are MUCH more forgiving for a more unskilled driver.
If you are comparing a car's abilities solely on the output of it's engine at a specific RPM, then there is nothing really to talk about there...
maybe we should stop. we are doing a dis-service to vendors everywhere. these are the same people who will buy every suspension/power component available because they think it will make them a better driver. by telling people the truth, people might start taking driving lessons and not get into wrecks. now that just wouldnt be american
whats even better is how they keep talking about coilovers, sways, brakes, etc and are missing THEY most important upgrade (short of driving skill)
TIRES. The only thing that actually touches the road. Doesnt matter how stiff and tuned your suspension is or how huge your brakes are if you are rolling on stock RE092s
TIRES. The only thing that actually touches the road. Doesnt matter how stiff and tuned your suspension is or how huge your brakes are if you are rolling on stock RE092s
VIP Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,632
From: Yokosuka, Japan
Car Info: 2008 EVO X/1991 Nissan Skyline GT-R32
Originally Posted by 06WRX4ME
I do agree that skill is needed, but your telling me that if i take an FP Green setup and put it on my 06 WRX and leave everything else stock I will be able to control the power. Your dead wrong. I will need new tires, handling, at the minimum.
I understand where you guys are coming from, but its confusing me. Why mod your engine if you are going to run the same lines because your suspension isnt modded. Why is the fastest STi on a track near stock HP, but is modded like crazy in the body and suspension?


