how not to have a good group drive
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 100
From: Straight outa Concord!
Car Info: 02 wrx
Tools that think they can drive but in reality can't
(Plaintiff)
v
i-Club members
(Defense)
Would just the screen names be sufficient?
This has been good times. I've had quite the chuckle reading this over the last few days. My favorite part would be when the driver says he's an experienced auto crosser so there for he has lots of car control and since the other dude went off it wasn't driver error. "Target fixation" is the word that describes driver #2. "Driving with the wrong head" describes driver #1. Second after that is asking for people to pay for their bills.
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3
copyright infringement is reproducing or using someone else's images (photography, art, etc) or work without their consent.
(b) Scope and Exercise of Rights. — Only the author of a work of visual art has the rights conferred by subsection (a) in that work, whether or not the author is the copyright owner.
http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap1.html#106a
(b) Scope and Exercise of Rights. — Only the author of a work of visual art has the rights conferred by subsection (a) in that work, whether or not the author is the copyright owner.
http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap1.html#106a
copyright infringement is reproducing or using someone else's images (photography, art, etc) or work without their consent.
(b) Scope and Exercise of Rights. — Only the author of a work of visual art has the rights conferred by subsection (a) in that work, whether or not the author is the copyright owner.
http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap1.html#106a
(b) Scope and Exercise of Rights. — Only the author of a work of visual art has the rights conferred by subsection (a) in that work, whether or not the author is the copyright owner.
http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap1.html#106a
oooo....so for example, if i took those picture, and allowed them to be posted, then would there still be a problem?
Last edited by AzN121184; Jan 22, 2008 at 12:22 PM.
iClub Silver Vendor
iTrader: (25)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,494
From: Participating in some Anarchy!
Car Info: 2005 LGT wagon
copyright infringement is reproducing or using someone else's images (photography, art, etc) or work without their consent.
(b) Scope and Exercise of Rights. — Only the author of a work of visual art has the rights conferred by subsection (a) in that work, whether or not the author is the copyright owner.
http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap1.html#106a
(b) Scope and Exercise of Rights. — Only the author of a work of visual art has the rights conferred by subsection (a) in that work, whether or not the author is the copyright owner.
http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap1.html#106a
I'd really like to see the lawsuit though. I didn't know you could get sued for being a douchebag, I thought that was every American's right
Registered User
iTrader: (57)
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,380
From: the area
Car Info: 04 impreza wrx R.I.P Daniel Wentz JOEBOBBUCKET
there is no copy right or soem type of claim on those pictuers anyways. there isnt a tag on the pictures stating to took the picture. but hell i dont care. i love the syms wing tho!!
iClub Silver Vendor
iTrader: (25)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,494
From: Participating in some Anarchy!
Car Info: 2005 LGT wagon
Should've read Section 107:
§ 107. Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use40
Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include —
(1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
(2) the nature of the copyrighted work;
(3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
(4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.
Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include —
(1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
(2) the nature of the copyrighted work;
(3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
(4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,900
From: Baja Oregon
Car Info: '05 Impreza Outback Sport ~ "WTF! Two-Toned?"
copyright infringement is reproducing or using someone else's images (photography, art, etc) or work without their consent.
(b) Scope and Exercise of Rights. — Only the author of a work of visual art has the rights conferred by subsection (a) in that work, whether or not the author is the copyright owner.
http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap1.html#106a
(b) Scope and Exercise of Rights. — Only the author of a work of visual art has the rights conferred by subsection (a) in that work, whether or not the author is the copyright owner.
http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap1.html#106a
If I shoot a shot in a public place of a public event I own ALL the rights to do whateverr the f**k I want with them!!!
If I shoot a picture of someone in a studio or in private and then publish those pictures for profit without a release, THEN the law is being broken!
You can go back to where you came from now ~ You won't be missed!
Bye!
Last edited by NW OBS; Jan 22, 2008 at 01:51 PM.
