test drive - S2000 ... WOW

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 26, 2005 | 05:37 AM
  #31  
HxllxMan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 635
From: Tahiti
Car Info: Renault Clio RS R27
I like the s2k, better than a 350z.
s2k is not a easy car to drive IMO, when I test drove one, it was pretty scary... to go to fast in cornering. Compared to the Evo, after couple of miles, I was very comfortable with the car... very easy to handle.

s2k is something different since of course it's not AWD, handling will depend of the driver ability. AWD are great and fun, but if you really want to play with a car, RWD like the s2k is badass.

For a non turbo car, performance are awesome.

Last edited by HxllxMan; May 26, 2005 at 06:05 AM.
Old May 26, 2005 | 06:22 AM
  #32  
keirnna's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,659
From: Okinawa, Japan
Car Info: 1996 STI V3 Type RA
It is true that AWD gives novices lots of confidence in driving. Especially the EVO since most everything is computer controlled. From every review I have read the STi take more effort and a gives a skilled driver more room to control the car. On the Best Motoring video that one Japanese dude won't shut up about how the EVO won't let him do a thing. RWD is definitly where it is at for skill. I loved my 240, and I'll pick up another one once I get out of debt.
Old May 26, 2005 | 06:54 AM
  #33  
1reguL8NSTi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 9,198
From: I gotta have more cow bell!!!!
Car Info: 05 STi
Originally Posted by clamdip
RWD? this is why i looooove my TT supra!!!!!!
Supra's are great and have been a long time favorite of mine but I'd rather have an S2K and some of this. http://www.kingmotorsports.com/vehic...?vehicle=S2000
Old May 26, 2005 | 07:06 AM
  #34  
1reguL8NSTi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 9,198
From: I gotta have more cow bell!!!!
Car Info: 05 STi
http://www.todaracing.com/products/h...le_bodies.html
Mmmmmm........delicious.
Old May 26, 2005 | 01:55 PM
  #35  
Mach5WRX's Avatar
Angry Dan
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,183
From: www.turboculture.com
Car Info: 05 Evo VIII
Mugen parts = prices that are as high as giraffe p*ssy!!!!
Old May 26, 2005 | 01:58 PM
  #36  
Mach5WRX's Avatar
Angry Dan
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,183
From: www.turboculture.com
Car Info: 05 Evo VIII
Originally Posted by gdogg
i want the one we have- its 2001, 14,000 miles........ nuff said
I'm sure you can get a good price for it right?


I've said this before...DON'T drive an S2000. Once you do, you have to buy one!!
Old May 26, 2005 | 02:52 PM
  #37  
islandx's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,527
From: Anti-___
Originally Posted by keirnna
It is true that AWD gives novices lots of confidence in driving. Especially the EVO since most everything is computer controlled. From every review I have read the STi take more effort and a gives a skilled driver more room to control the car. On the Best Motoring video that one Japanese dude won't shut up about how the EVO won't let him do a thing. RWD is definitly where it is at for skill. I loved my 240, and I'll pick up another one once I get out of debt.
Actually, I believe that in the USDM versions of EVO and STi, The STi is more computer controlled than the EVO.
Old May 26, 2005 | 03:32 PM
  #38  
b_drift's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,286
From: 2006 Streetcar Showoff Hot Dog Eating Champion
Car Info: heavy, stock power, slow, perfect
Originally Posted by Mach5WRX
Mugen parts = prices that are as high as giraffe p*ssy!!!!

dayum. was that original? that was funny.

b
Old May 26, 2005 | 08:35 PM
  #39  
keirnna's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,659
From: Okinawa, Japan
Car Info: 1996 STI V3 Type RA
Originally Posted by islandx
Actually, I believe that in the USDM versions of EVO and STi, The STi is more computer controlled than the EVO.
You may be right with the USDM versions since the US EVO has no yaw sensor and no front LSD. I know the LSD has nothing to do with it, but it is a totally different car from the JDM version.
Old May 26, 2005 | 10:58 PM
  #40  
oldmansan's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,176
From: Southern California
Car Info: 2016 Z51 C7, 2007 Exige S, 2008 ZX-10R, 2016 Taco
I've

driven the S2000 (Joey's), and raced it (supercharged version, again Joey's). It's fast, but not that fast IMHO. My WRX with a stock turbo was consistently faster with street tires vs S2K R-compound tires. It's well engineered, but I feel it could use a bit more displacement to justify it's cost. When I've been behind Joey's S2K watching him drive, his car is a handfull. I honestly think it loses time due to having to compensate for the rear end getting loose. I like the S2000, but I think that to make it significantly better will take major money. I say that because the stock car is so balanced, modifying it requires carefull consideration. There are many high-dollar parts for the S2000 that actually lose power over stock. Not saying Subies don't have the same problems. S2000, nice car, but it's so nicely done stock, it's going to cost a bunch to make it better. Mach5WRX, granted the STI is heavy. Between the S2K and your STI there has to be about 600 lbs or more. Bottom line, I really like the S2K. I really like Joey's S2K. But I'd rather drive my car at the track vs a modified S2K. I honestly think my car is easier to drive, and faster as well. And I haven't even driven my car with the 17X8.5 R-compounds yet. Opinions vary.

San
Old May 27, 2005 | 01:19 AM
  #41  
HxllxMan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 635
From: Tahiti
Car Info: Renault Clio RS R27
Originally Posted by keirnna
You may be right with the USDM versions since the US EVO has no yaw sensor and no front LSD. I know the LSD has nothing to do with it, but it is a totally different car from the JDM version.
The USDM 03' Evo is more like an RS version since we don't have ACD, AYC and Front LSD.I only have for traction control the Rear LSD and 50/50 AWD, that's why I want to keep my car and not get a JDM Evo in Tahiti. I drove an Evo 7 with all the JDM stuff and I found out the USDM Evo required more driving skill ( more fun and car is lighter also ). Depend of people, lot of japanese don't have AYC when they put a lot of WHP, because AYC doesn't follow after.
Old May 27, 2005 | 01:49 AM
  #42  
Mach5WRX's Avatar
Angry Dan
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,183
From: www.turboculture.com
Car Info: 05 Evo VIII
Originally Posted by oldmansan
S2000, nice car, but it's so nicely done stock, it's going to cost a bunch to make it better.
Couldn't have said it better San!!!!


The S2000 is not the fastest car in the world. But I didn't get it for that. The car feels great, looks great, drives great and it's not slow.
Old May 27, 2005 | 04:10 AM
  #43  
gdogg's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,783
From: rightBehindYou, HI
Car Info: 1973 Huevo Ranchero
^^ thats true- i mean come on if i really wanted a FAST car that handles great at an exellent price- i'd follow in steve's footsteps and get a used vette- but i'd like to keep my budget under 23k, plus the convertible top is an attractive feature that i've never had before- and i'd keep the car stock.... and maybe that neat hardtop with the PIMP rack with rollers!




aloha from the summit of *-^-Mauna Kea-^-*
Old May 27, 2005 | 09:26 AM
  #44  
v rod's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 643
From: At work
Car Info: Real Slow
the s2k is a great roadster period! go-kart like handling, great braking and a screaming engine. that's what makes it so fun to drive imo.

dan, wait till you take it down pch with the top down!
Old May 27, 2005 | 11:23 AM
  #45  
Mach5WRX's Avatar
Angry Dan
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,183
From: www.turboculture.com
Car Info: 05 Evo VIII
Originally Posted by v rod
dan, wait till you take it down pch with the top down!

wOOt



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:00 PM.