Dyno'd XT - 174 AWHP
Guest
Posts: n/a
Please look at this post and comment if you have some info.
https://www.i-club.com/forums/showth...threadid=42452
https://www.i-club.com/forums/showth...threadid=42452
250,000-mile Club President
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,770
From: Bizerkeley
Car Info: MBP 02 WRX wagon
Re: Enthusiasts...
Originally posted by DashingMax
Enthusiasts, such as myself, prefer 40-50% more power compared to stock...
Enthusiasts, such as myself, prefer 40-50% more power compared to stock...
So if you could afford a Ferrari Enzo, "enthusiasts such as yourself" would be expecting mods to get 900-1000HP?
?
Enthusiasts such as MYSELF try to buy cars that are built with sufficient horsepower in the first place, so we don't need to throw away the reliability and proven technology that automakers spend countless millions of dollars on developing.
Not to knock what Vishnu and Cobb do, they provide a valuable service for enthusiasts who seek more than is offered through retail/factory channels, but with the understanding that their customers take on some risks, including possibly long term reliability, fuel economy, and smog compliance.
For some- but certainly not all "enthusiasts" those are trade offs that they're willing to take on.
People that race their cars are usually limited in terms of modifications allowed for different classes, so except in the least restricted (most expensive) classes, most race car drivers are getting by with somewhere between stock and maybe 30% over.
Sure there are drag racing, and prototype exceptions to that, but I'm thinking in terms of cars that "enthusiasts" drive daily, at least apart from their track time.
in my opinion, anyone who wants 50% more HP than their car has in stock trim should be someone with a (massive) budget and passion for experimenting and doing this kind of work themselves (maybe that's you- DashingMax, I don't know...)
or else they simply bought the wrong car in the first place-
I mean if you start with a 120HP econobox, then maybe asking to bump it up to 160-180 might be worth some effort, but to take a factory turbo motor that comes off the boat with 250-300 ponies, fully capable of out accellerating most cars on the road, and throw more money at it to try to wring out half again that much, I just think there are better things to spend the money on.
Whoa! where did that come from?
40%-50% is possible on certain cars. And yes, you do give up reliability, comfort, etc. Not all "Preferences" are practical.
I'd "prefer" to just buy a ML55 AMG, but my preference is not affordable.
My question was that since very high horsepower is definitely done with a WRX, maybe, something similar may be possible to do on a Forester XT.
Cheers!
40%-50% is possible on certain cars. And yes, you do give up reliability, comfort, etc. Not all "Preferences" are practical.
I'd "prefer" to just buy a ML55 AMG, but my preference is not affordable.
My question was that since very high horsepower is definitely done with a WRX, maybe, something similar may be possible to do on a Forester XT.
Cheers!
Guest
Posts: n/a
Even if it's possible, what's the point? Under what conditions in legal street driving, on roads we all share, would you ever use 350-400BHP in a 3,200 pound XT? The car in dead-stock trim reaches 60 in 5.3 seconds, with a governed top speed of 130. What important street-driving objective cannot be achieved with its current output that would be attainable with 50% more power?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Even if it's possible, what's the point? Under what conditions in legal street driving, on roads we all share, would you ever use 350-400BHP in a 3,200 pound XT? The car in dead-stock trim reaches 60 in 5.3 seconds, with a governed top speed of 130. What important street-driving objective cannot be achieved with its current output that would be attainable with 50% more power?
Last edited by ducktapeguy; Jan 13, 2004 at 11:39 AM.
Guest
Posts: n/a
I doubt any owner of a 165HP naturally aspirated Forester would disagree that towing 1,500 or 2,000 pounds up and over mountain passes severely taxes its ability. The XT answers that need very well. Would the same real-world task require 400 HP? I doubt it.
Guest
Posts: n/a
That's probably true. But I doubt any owner of a 165 hp NA forester is using it to tow 1500-2000 lbs up and over mountain passes regularly. If so, I would say they picked the wrong vehicle for the job. There is no set hp number that is perfect for every person, some people want more, some people don't.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
OakosAutomotive
Vendor Group Buys/Specials
20
Feb 29, 2004 04:38 PM
subiedave
Engine/Power - EJ20T (pre-2006 WRX and JDM)
32
Oct 23, 2003 10:07 PM



