Changed my tranny oil and now I get a clank/tap when I shift gears fast
VIP Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 341
From: High in the Rockies!... but not too high
Car Info: 2004 2.5RS pacifica blue with black Tarmacs
I switched to Redline 75W90NS which is what Redline recommends for an 04 RS tranny due to it's GL-5 requirements (FYI MT90 can be used where GL4 is required), and put regular 75W90 in the rear end. I hate that grey goop that comes in it from the factory and will never use it again. I switched at 2700 miles and the only difference I noticed is you want to shift the car easy until it's warmed up also it takes a little while to work in so give it a week or two, again I don't know why it might just be it shifts different and I had to get used to it. Once it reaches operating temp though it shifts like a dream. Now this may seem strange, but one thing I noticed is with the OE fluid the tranny shifted better whan it was cold and as it got hot didn't seem to shift as well, with the Redline it didn't shift as well cold as the OE stuff, but like I said when it gets warms up look out.
By the way BAN SUVS I asked Dave the tech guy at Redline about shockproof and he advised me against it so you may want to see what he thinks before you put it in.
By the way BAN SUVS I asked Dave the tech guy at Redline about shockproof and he advised me against it so you may want to see what he thinks before you put it in.
Last edited by SubySal; Sep 27, 2003 at 05:05 PM.
VIP Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,639
From: Longing for my ol' white '02 WRX :(
Car Info: 2016 Acura RDX ... meh. Um, nice subwoofer?
Yeah the guys at Redline warned me against Shockproof too .... but you know, he wouldn't actually say WHY it wasn't a good idea. The proof is in the puddin'. Everyone I know who's used Shockproof hasn't complained, including myself. Its at least as good as stock. Now, for long term... I dunno.
It defies logic... the 75w90 Redline has the friction modifier that should make it a better performing fluid than the Shockproof for syncho transmissions... but its just not the case. I dunno why. I just read an article in the latest Turbo Magazine (cover: "WRX Killer" heh) where they put the Shockproof Heavy in an SE-R ttransmission which shared the same notorious weakness reputation with our WRXs... and they say it does wonders for the SE-R transmssion. Go figure.
I dunno... I think Redline is covering their azz or something. Maybe because Subaru requires GL-5/MT-1 and the Redline 75w90 meets that and the Shockproof doesn't, Dave @ Redline relays the party line and recommends 75w90.
jason
It defies logic... the 75w90 Redline has the friction modifier that should make it a better performing fluid than the Shockproof for syncho transmissions... but its just not the case. I dunno why. I just read an article in the latest Turbo Magazine (cover: "WRX Killer" heh) where they put the Shockproof Heavy in an SE-R ttransmission which shared the same notorious weakness reputation with our WRXs... and they say it does wonders for the SE-R transmssion. Go figure.
I dunno... I think Redline is covering their azz or something. Maybe because Subaru requires GL-5/MT-1 and the Redline 75w90 meets that and the Shockproof doesn't, Dave @ Redline relays the party line and recommends 75w90.

jason
VIP Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 341
From: High in the Rockies!... but not too high
Car Info: 2004 2.5RS pacifica blue with black Tarmacs
I know what you mean about friction modifiers I got the same advice from Dave, but the guy has never steered me wrong. He did say that it was more the viscosity of the fluid that promotes smoother shifting then friction. I'm not sure why, but I think I'll email him and find out.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
slow04wrx
Bay Area
2
Oct 10, 2010 04:30 PM




