T-Mobile vs. Cingular (Coverage in the Bay)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 20, 2006 | 12:47 AM
  #61  
aywwsd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 58
From: Bay Area
Car Info: 2005 STi
was with verizon since 1999, until a few month ago.

back then they were pretty good, but their prices have been rising, service... not as much.

so i end up switching to tmobile. phones are better and cheaper. i save about 40-50 bucks a month.

coverage is good so far. sometime around the freeway, calls would break up for a second or two during driving, but other then that, coverage is pretty equal to verizon. maybe it's because i rarely travel out of san francisco/san mateo area, but i dont leave the area much, so it doesnt matter to me the coverage in more rural areas.

this is coming from someone that burns up at least 4000 minutes a month for both personal and business calls.
Old Jun 20, 2006 | 11:11 AM
  #62  
View Askew's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 5,843
From: WA
Car Info: '21 STI
I don't know if it's just me, but Verizon sucks lately. I've been getting so many dropped calls and the reception isn't what it once was. I'm waiting for my contract to end and I'm switching to Cingular.
Old Jun 20, 2006 | 11:26 AM
  #63  
DetailAddict's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (52)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,912
From: San Jose, CA
Car Info: Evo X
I have had pretty good experience with Sprint and Verizon in terms of coverage. However, neither one of them would work at my work building. Seems like only Cingular works here at my work... I am still on Verizon and looking into Cingular when my contract is up since I get 15% discount through my work...
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
VRT MBasile
Bay Area
3
Aug 1, 2006 08:09 AM
dSpec
Bay Area
18
Jan 23, 2006 04:24 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:43 PM.