you mean you haven't seen great results from it?

just remember, at the short end of the sigma, the widest f-stop is 4.0. that is about 2 1/3 stop slower than the 50 1.8.

 

I use Aperture for the basic import and processing.

 

+1: the inbuilt flash on the XTi is crap, and that's from an avid XTi user.

Someone at the office was using a 5D with a Speedlite at our office Christmas bash, and the results were night and day (ignore the 5D bit). A decent flash bounced gives you more light in the scene and a decent photo, rather than the washed out morgue specials you get from the inbuilt. It's next on my list.

 

You're maybe?

 

To the earlier points (use cases, if you will) it's nicely scriptable and easily driven from Perl [programs]. Just the thing for lashing together handy bits of resizing etc. in a content management pipeline.

 

Yeh, but still, other images I've seen were AMAZING! I think it's the lighting. Since the widest f-stop is 4, it's performance in low light is weak. I remember when it was earlier in the day, I took some photos outside and they came out decent, but now, it was real hard to get a decent shot (night/zoomed in/nothing except flash) the 50mm f/1.8 is amazing at night and surprisingly the kit lens is taking good pictures.

I'll try some HDR's and landscapes/flowers tomorrow with the sigma, hopefully I get good results, I'll post pics.

 

John, it depends on how old your Sigma lens is. Some of the old lenses don't work well with the newer cameras. That's why I never buy a lens that is not from the manufacturer of my camera. The only lens I ever purchased that is not a Nikon is my Tamron Macro 90mm. I am sure when I go to the D3, it will not work anymore. So again, investing in the right stuff will get you the desired results very similar to Subarus.

Happy to help.

 

Learn your camera and your RAW files before working with HDR. You really have to learn how to product great images before you get to the computer. Photography is in the camera, not the computer. I hate it when people do that.

 

^^^ Trust me, even though this camera is new, I'll produce better HDR's than you, even without a tripod. LOL


JK, But the sigma lens isn't THAT old, its 2-3 years old I think, at the most, and it shoots NICE, I think I was getting bad results because it was in very low light situations, tomorrow during the day, hopefully I'll get some sun, and i'll take shots outside to see its quality. Plus, this lens is $195, so if it won't work on my next body...it's going on Ebay, no big deal.

 

why wouldn't a F-mount work on a D3?

 

Damn it JDM555 you paid to much for your new equipment...
shoulda bought my 20D ($460)

this isnt your gay, its my gay!

 

Post up a couple of images that are showing the so-so quality. Is it due to slow shutter speed while hand holding? is it soft due to not being in focus? etc..
It will be easier for us to understand what you mean if you post a couple examples.

Now what you should work on is just basics of photography such as composition, getting to understand equivalent exposures by variating the shutter and aperture blah blah blah.
Sounds like you are having fun so far though which is the main idea.

 

haha, gotta learn how to swing the bat before you can hit a homerun junior. (=

and btw, mynikonlens has been switch hitting since before wooden bats...

 

So true!

I'm playing tee ball, i admit it! I'm far from the minors.

 

I think we're on the same team...(=