Good LCD TV (Gagan get in here!)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 14, 2009 | 01:12 AM
  #46  
imHELLAslow's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,349
From: san jose, HELLA cali
Car Info: 20psi Daily!
Originally Posted by joltdudeuc
Yeah, definitely, I'd love to have that store name.
yeah the ebay username is chancedeals hope you guys find what your looking for!
Old Feb 2, 2009 | 12:08 PM
  #47  
Yin's Avatar
Yin
Registered User
iTrader: (40)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,028
From: Tahoe City, CA
Car Info: 2016 FXT
Looking for a 42" LCD TV.

goals:
- under $1k
- 1080p
- 120hz
- Should i be thinking about features like contrast ratio? dont know if i can tell the difference.

Found these on tigerdirect:

Toshibas:
http://www.tigerdirect.com/applicati...392&CatId=3650
http://www.tigerdirect.com/applicati...394&CatId=3650

Vizio:
http://www.tigerdirect.com/applicati...304&CatId=3650

They look like good deals for around $750. what do you guys think?
Old Feb 2, 2009 | 12:42 PM
  #48  
sigma pi's Avatar
9 to 5 mod
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 57,389
From: Chavez Ravine
Car Info: 03 Impreza WRX
Originally Posted by Yin
Looking for a 32-36" LCD TV.

goals:
- under 500$
- 1080p
- 120hz
- Should i be thinking about features like contrast ratio? dont know if i can tell the difference.

They look like good deals for around $750. what do you guys think?
samsung 6 series, whats comprable
Old Feb 2, 2009 | 12:46 PM
  #49  
kYLEMtnCRUZr's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,892
From: Hangin in Placerville youtube.com/rallydude1515
Car Info: 1999 RS Coupé- 1995 Mazda Miata -KTM 300
my friend got 120hz which is cool for action...But is it me or do images seem to float around when they arent moving very fast?

and watching westerns sucks in 120hz...totally ruins it IMO...its too clear looking, like too many frames going on in 1 second.
Old Feb 2, 2009 | 02:51 PM
  #50  
Yin's Avatar
Yin
Registered User
iTrader: (40)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,028
From: Tahoe City, CA
Car Info: 2016 FXT
"too clear looking" never heard that complaint before haha
Old Feb 2, 2009 | 02:57 PM
  #51  
kYLEMtnCRUZr's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,892
From: Hangin in Placerville youtube.com/rallydude1515
Car Info: 1999 RS Coupé- 1995 Mazda Miata -KTM 300
haha ya rly. It's just weird seeing watching some old westerns with my friend...seeing Clint Eastwood and John Wayne so clearly kinda takes away from it all IMO

But thats not my main grudge, its the way the people float on screen. I noticed watching Lost. The movement looks good when there is movement, but when they are at rest it looks dizzying to me.
Old Feb 2, 2009 | 03:21 PM
  #52  
Yin's Avatar
Yin
Registered User
iTrader: (40)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,028
From: Tahoe City, CA
Car Info: 2016 FXT
^ such the luddite . jk i feel ya on that. kinda like listening to vinyl, nothing like the raw recording.
Old Feb 2, 2009 | 09:05 PM
  #53  
STi-owns-evo's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,670
From: East Bay / Pomona
Car Info: '02 PSM WRX
iirc, most everything is at 60 fps, so the TV interpolates the rest, causing the unnatural movement.

I'm sure Gagan can go further in depth.
Old Feb 3, 2009 | 11:52 AM
  #54  
kYLEMtnCRUZr's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,892
From: Hangin in Placerville youtube.com/rallydude1515
Car Info: 1999 RS Coupé- 1995 Mazda Miata -KTM 300
yeah that makes sense. I think its because we are used to 24 or 30fps then we see 60fps or whatever it is and we see the natural movement, since nothing is ever perfectly still.

i thought 60fps was only used for slow mo capture? because movies are always 24 i thought. and reality tv 30fps

But for the westerns? it looks soooo much clearer and smooth, i guess they used really good cameras or something.
Old Feb 3, 2009 | 12:07 PM
  #55  
Racenut's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,138
From: Monterey Bay, Ca
Car Info: WR Blue Wagon
The best thing about 120hz is being able to watch a 2 hour movie in 24 minutes
Old Feb 3, 2009 | 03:36 PM
  #56  
apetron's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,016
From: Oakland
Car Info: 07 STI Built/Widebody/E85/Rotated GTX3576 13 Fozz
Originally Posted by kYLEMtnCRUZr
yeah that makes sense. I think its because we are used to 24 or 30fps then we see 60fps or whatever it is and we see the natural movement, since nothing is ever perfectly still.

i thought 60fps was only used for slow mo capture? because movies are always 24 i thought. and reality tv 30fps

But for the westerns? it looks soooo much clearer and smooth, i guess they used really good cameras or something.
TV and Movies are typically 24fps.

Video Games shoot for 60fps for the best performance, but usually average around 30. (Really depends on the title, there are alot that run at 60fps).
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bclee
Bay Area
4
Oct 28, 2003 04:04 PM
failure
Bay Area
2
Apr 8, 2003 09:12 AM
BADWRX
Bay Area
14
Mar 31, 2003 11:20 PM
Steppin Razor
Bay Area
3
Jan 8, 2003 09:51 PM
Daios
Bay Area
4
Jan 4, 2003 06:30 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:12 AM.