Teh Politics Forum Rumors and lies and Teh Iraqi Info Minister and much much more...

VAT in the US?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 4, 2008 | 11:38 AM
  #31  
Irrational X's Avatar
plays well with others
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 9,923
From: Sac
Car Info: your mother crazy
Originally Posted by LxJLthr
So who is going to decide what is non-essential? That is like playing financial God to me...To my female friends a $500 dress is essential, while I consider a gym membership to be a necessity for me. That's where things will break down, as I have already mentioned, when you apply the tax to only certain levels of society it is very hard not to avoid discriminating against someone and allowing for much easier avoidance of the tax. That is why with tax systems you need to have them system wide, which opens a new can of worms.
we already do this with food stamps, WIC, no taxes on certain products. it should be up to state governments to decide how to tax their citizens.

the Fed should be getting handouts from us, not the other way around
Old Dec 4, 2008 | 11:38 AM
  #32  
Irrational X's Avatar
plays well with others
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 9,923
From: Sac
Car Info: your mother crazy
Originally Posted by sigma pi
the bus would get you to work too
actually no it wont, not in under 3 hours at least. that would include 4 transfers as well.
Old Dec 4, 2008 | 11:41 AM
  #33  
Max Xevious's Avatar
BanHammer™
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 47,596
From: Wagonmafia Propaganda Lieutenant
Car Info: 2014 Forester XT
Originally Posted by sigma pi
the bus would get you to work too
you're mom gets me to work.
Old Dec 4, 2008 | 11:50 AM
  #34  
Irrational X's Avatar
plays well with others
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 9,923
From: Sac
Car Info: your mother crazy
Originally Posted by sigma pi
the bus would get you to work too
here are the best routes i can find for RT. none of them get me to work on time, and most of them cost the same i would spend in gas to drive there myself.

option # | Lines | depart/arive |travel time|transfers| fare
Option 1 011, 507 6:08a -7:22a 74 1 $2.25
Option 2 011, 038, 507 6:08a-7:22a 74 2 $3.25
Option 3 011, 141, 507 6:08a-7:22a 74 2 $3.25
Option 4 013, 011, 507 5:42a-7:22a 99 2 $4.25
Old Dec 4, 2008 | 11:51 AM
  #35  
FW Motorsports's Avatar
iClub Silver Vendor
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,494
From: Participating in some Anarchy!
Car Info: 2005 LGT wagon
Originally Posted by Mr. Xevious
you're mom gets me to work.
You too????
Old Dec 4, 2008 | 11:52 AM
  #36  
FW Motorsports's Avatar
iClub Silver Vendor
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,494
From: Participating in some Anarchy!
Car Info: 2005 LGT wagon
Mass transit harms the environment more than single drivers.
Old Dec 4, 2008 | 11:57 AM
  #37  
LxJLthr's Avatar
I survived the Mod Challenge and all I got was this lousy title
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,030
From: In Mother Russia...
Car Info: ...zeh car drives you!
Originally Posted by irrational x
ill elaborate.

i drive to work. oil changes are an essential service, so dont tax it. having a pool installed at my house is a luxury, so tax it. buying an M6 is a luxury and should be taxed accordingly when a civic can get me to work just as well.

also with user based taxes you have the ability to do a certain amount of price control and mitigate the impact of short term rises in price. Imagine if 10 years ago we started ramping up the gas tax so that 2 years ago gas was already $4. as the price of oil increased the rate of tax could be decreased to maintain stability.

now, thats to to say im in favor of those sorts of market interference, i just like to use the gas example since its a touchy subject.

the point is there are much better ways to generate revenue than income taxes.
Originally Posted by sigma pi
the bus would get you to work too
That is an essential service to YOU. I do not drive to work, I actually do take a bus to BART, BART to downtown and walk to work. And regardless of the time and number of transfers the bus WILL get you to work. I could probably argue that the bus will be the essential service since it is cheaper to run and more effective for the greater mass of people, while you using your car to commute is a luxury many people do not have. How long it takes you to get there is your individual problem; I am just providing an essential service.

Do you see my whole point, how and who is to determine what is essential or not? As I mentioned before, logistics and implementation will be a nightmare, if not impossible. What is a point of having a benefit if the costs will outweigh it?

Originally Posted by irrational x
we already do this with food stamps, WIC, no taxes on certain products. it should be up to state governments to decide how to tax their citizens.

the Fed should be getting handouts from us, not the other way around
...and we see how awesome that is working out to be...every state is in huge deficit refusing to accept that it not their habits that need reform, but the balance of their bank accounts. Great. I actually went through the public aid and food stamp system, and do not get me started on how big of a convoluted, inefficient ineffective, bureaucratic of an EPIC FAIL it is.
Old Dec 4, 2008 | 12:23 PM
  #38  
FW Motorsports's Avatar
iClub Silver Vendor
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,494
From: Participating in some Anarchy!
Car Info: 2005 LGT wagon
Government Mandated Wealth Redistibution schemes always lead to failure.
Old Dec 4, 2008 | 12:25 PM
  #39  
RussB's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,351
From: pompous douchebag
Car Info: $200,000 sports car
Originally Posted by irrational x
ill elaborate.

i drive to work. oil changes are an essential service, so dont tax it. having a pool installed at my house is a luxury, so tax it. buying an M6 is a luxury and should be taxed accordingly when a civic can get me to work just as well.

also with user based taxes you have the ability to do a certain amount of price control and mitigate the impact of short term rises in price. Imagine if 10 years ago we started ramping up the gas tax so that 2 years ago gas was already $4. as the price of oil increased the rate of tax could be decreased to maintain stability.

now, thats to to say im in favor of those sorts of market interference, i just like to use the gas example since its a touchy subject.

the point is there are much better ways to generate revenue than income taxes.
IX in 2012!
Old Dec 4, 2008 | 12:26 PM
  #40  
RussB's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,351
From: pompous douchebag
Car Info: $200,000 sports car
Originally Posted by Paul@dbtuned
Government Mandated Wealth Redistibution schemes always lead to failure.
like income tax and welfare?
Old Dec 4, 2008 | 12:51 PM
  #41  
LxJLthr's Avatar
I survived the Mod Challenge and all I got was this lousy title
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,030
From: In Mother Russia...
Car Info: ...zeh car drives you!
Originally Posted by irrational x
also with user based taxes you have the ability to do a certain amount of price control and mitigate the impact of short term rises in price. Imagine if 10 years ago we started ramping up the gas tax so that 2 years ago gas was already $4. as the price of oil increased the rate of tax could be decreased to maintain stability.
Isn't price control...oh...a little socialistic/communistic? And what if you predict the price wrong? What are the ramifications of that? It is impossible to predict market conditions and people's wants; if it was possible, we would stop having free markets long time ago because what would have been the point?

Also, hindsight is ALWAYS 20/20...Imagine is all of us invested in Apple before its big turnaround? Imagining and discussing ideologies is not difficult..but actually implementing it objectively without bias and outside influence is. That is what always interests me the most. What are the pros/cons, cost/benefit, long term effects etc etc etc of any idea? Pretty much in all my conversation I always end up asking "Great idea, I actually never thought of that concept...but that's half the battle, how are you going to go about addressing the logistics/implementation/integration of it to the real world? Is it even feasibly or worth it" And guess what? Very few people can actually answer.
Old Dec 4, 2008 | 01:30 PM
  #42  
Irrational X's Avatar
plays well with others
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 9,923
From: Sac
Car Info: your mother crazy
Originally Posted by Paul@dbtuned
Mass transit harms the environment more than single drivers.
..and i carpool.

Originally Posted by LxJLthr
...and we see how awesome that is working out to be...every state is in huge deficit refusing to accept that it not their habits that need reform, but the balance of their bank accounts. Great. I actually went through the public aid and food stamp system, and do not get me started on how big of a convoluted, inefficient ineffective, bureaucratic of an EPIC FAIL it is.
CA wouldn't have a deficit if we didn't pay $1 to the fed for every 79c we receive in fed programs.

masticate on that for a minute.

thus Californians pay more total taxes than the rest of the states, even though we provide much more to the Federal coffers. And we're broke. between 1981 and 2004 CA dropped off $489,114,000,000 into federal coffers and for that we received back 386,400,060,000 over the same period. an imbalance of over $100,000,000,000

Originally Posted by LxJLthr
Isn't price control...oh...a little socialistic/communistic? And what if you predict the price wrong? What are the ramifications of that? It is impossible to predict market conditions and people's wants; if it was possible, we would stop having free markets long time ago because what would have been the point?
what makes you think we have a free market now? what do you think the FDIC, SEC, Federal Reserve, and Treasury Department are for.

protectionism by any other name is still protectionism. its not about whether we have it or not, its about making suck just a little bit less and do it more efficiently.
Old Dec 4, 2008 | 01:30 PM
  #43  
Irrational X's Avatar
plays well with others
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 9,923
From: Sac
Car Info: your mother crazy
Originally Posted by LxJLthr
Imagine is all of us invested in Apple before its big turnaround?

i did
Old Dec 4, 2008 | 02:00 PM
  #44  
LxJLthr's Avatar
I survived the Mod Challenge and all I got was this lousy title
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,030
From: In Mother Russia...
Car Info: ...zeh car drives you!
Originally Posted by irrational x
\CA wouldn't have a deficit if we didn't pay $1 to the fed for every 79c we receive in fed programs.

masticate on that for a minute.

thus Californians pay more total taxes than the rest of the states, even though we provide much more to the Federal coffers. And we're broke. between 1981 and 2004 CA dropped off $489,114,000,000 into federal coffers and for that we received back 386,400,060,000 over the same period. an imbalance of over $100,000,000,000
Great, here we go again...so to fill that gap are you saying we again need to throw more money at it instead of figuring out if all of that was really justifiable? Why did we contribute more that other states? Where did the money we receive go to; pork or something necessary? To me those statistics are symptoms indicating an underlying cause that remains untreated. Okay, great, we received less...if the numbers are correct, it does suck, but instead of budgeting or renegotiating terms we just continue to dig ourselves deeper into a hole?

Also, what is the source of your numbers? I am interested in reading up and learning more about that,

Originally Posted by irrational x
what makes you think we have a free market now? what do you think the FDIC, SEC, Federal Reserve, and Treasury Department are for.

protectionism by any other name is still protectionism. its not about whether we have it or not, its about making suck just a little bit less and do it more efficiently.
Here we go with semantics...I agree "free" markets was not the best selection of terms. But to use your terminology, more protectionism is not the answer here. That's like having a troubled kid and instead of figuring out and resolving his problems, just locking him up within confines of an institution and spend time and money patrolling the parameter. Sooner or later the problem will come back to bite you in the ***. Plus the institutions are only as good as the people that run them, but that's also a different can of worms.

And again, you have not answered one of my previous questions...You have been throwing out a lot of different individual ideas..Great...Now, how are you going to go about addressing the logistics/implementation/integration of it to the real world? Are they compatible together? And is it even feasibly or worth it? Otherwise, we will be here until the end of the world brainstorming about all the various options this world has to offer. This conversation will never end and neither of us will ever be right or wrong.

Last edited by LxJLthr; Dec 4, 2008 at 02:02 PM.
Old Dec 4, 2008 | 02:09 PM
  #45  
Magish's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,650
From: Mountains
Car Info: 2007 Nissan Frontier
Originally Posted by Paul@dbtuned
Mass transit harms the environment more than single drivers.
Explain how trains hurt the environment more than single drivers. I'm curious.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:36 AM.