It took 4 years for Dems to Concede Loss
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: "It will take time to restore chaos." GWB
Posts: 3,461
Car Info: 72 Vespa with curb feelers
It took 4 years for Dems to Concede Loss
From Yahoo News:
"Democrats say Nader's candidacy in 2000 cost Al Gore (news - web sites) the election as the third-party candidate took votes in states such as Florida and New Hampshire that were decided by razor-thin margins."
link:http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor...on_el_pr/nader
So they finally are conceding the loss rather than holding up the notion that the election was stolen, even though they blame Nader for it.
How many days, weeks, or years do you think it will take Dems to blame Nader, theft, voter fraud, etc for Bush's victory this year?
"Democrats say Nader's candidacy in 2000 cost Al Gore (news - web sites) the election as the third-party candidate took votes in states such as Florida and New Hampshire that were decided by razor-thin margins."
link:http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor...on_el_pr/nader
So they finally are conceding the loss rather than holding up the notion that the election was stolen, even though they blame Nader for it.
How many days, weeks, or years do you think it will take Dems to blame Nader, theft, voter fraud, etc for Bush's victory this year?
#3
Funny I thought loss was conceded on December 13, 2000.
http://www.cspan.org/campaign2000/gorespeech.asp
http://www.cspan.org/campaign2000/gorespeech.asp
#4
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: "It will take time to restore chaos." GWB
Posts: 3,461
Car Info: 72 Vespa with curb feelers
Originally Posted by njc200
Funny I thought loss was conceded on December 13, 2000.
http://www.cspan.org/campaign2000/gorespeech.asp
http://www.cspan.org/campaign2000/gorespeech.asp
#5
VIP Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Walnut Creek, CA
Posts: 3,709
Car Info: CRZ EX-Navi/6MT & Vue Redline
Originally Posted by HellaDumb
I specifically said "Dems," not the losing candidate.
That's even more idiotic. You are linking every single indevidual to the party instead of listening to their spokeman? Fine... under your reasoning, Republican must beilieve that the confederacy was the right way to go in the Civil War, even though the party offially denounces it, just because some conservatives in the south hold on to that beliefe.
-Chris
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
constellation
Teh Politics Forum
28
10-08-2004 01:52 PM
mmboost
Engine/Power - EJ20T (pre-2006 WRX and JDM)
5
01-09-2004 11:25 PM