From Yahoo News:
"Democrats say Nader's candidacy in 2000 cost Al Gore (news - web sites) the election as the third-party candidate took votes in states such as Florida and New Hampshire that were decided by razor-thin margins."
link:http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor...on_el_pr/nader

So they finally are conceding the loss rather than holding up the notion that the election was stolen, even though they blame Nader for it.

How many days, weeks, or years do you think it will take Dems to blame Nader, theft, voter fraud, etc for Bush's victory this year?

 

Within the hour if it means Jimmy Carter gets a chance to feel significant again.

 

Funny I thought loss was conceded on December 13, 2000.

http://www.cspan.org/campaign2000/gorespeech.asp

 

I specifically said "Dems," not the losing candidate.

 

That's even more idiotic. You are linking every single indevidual to the party instead of listening to their spokeman? Fine... under your reasoning, Republican must beilieve that the confederacy was the right way to go in the Civil War, even though the party offially denounces it, just because some conservatives in the south hold on to that beliefe.

-Chris

 

I think next time the election is that close, we shoot both candidates and start over.