Teh Politics Forum Rumors and lies and Teh Iraqi Info Minister and much much more...

Obama's Plan to disarm America WTF???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 28, 2008 | 11:37 AM
  #1  
ipozestu's Avatar
Thread Starter
VIP Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,570
From: Subabrew Crew
Car Info: Broken Subarus
Obama's Plan to disarm America WTF???

WND source but worth a discussion.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7o84P...w&pageId=73464
http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?f...w&pageId=73464

Last edited by ipozestu; Aug 28, 2008 at 11:40 AM.
Old Aug 28, 2008 | 12:06 PM
  #2  
FW Motorsports's Avatar
iClub Silver Vendor
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,494
From: Participating in some Anarchy!
Car Info: 2005 LGT wagon
Nothing new....Socialist Democrats have been doing this for some time.
Clinton hacked the military...Carter did the same...
Old Aug 28, 2008 | 12:29 PM
  #3  
Max Xevious's Avatar
BanHammer™
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 47,596
From: Wagonmafia Propaganda Lieutenant
Car Info: 2014 Forester XT
GUNS KILL KIDS!!!

Old Aug 28, 2008 | 12:53 PM
  #4  
Superglue WRX's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 5,686
From: I was up above it, now I'm down in it
Car Info: New Government Motors SUV!
Oh noes, so we will only have 1,000 nuclear warheads instead of 2,000.

BFD! Good way to stop wasting money on **** we don't use.
Old Aug 28, 2008 | 01:27 PM
  #5  
ipozestu's Avatar
Thread Starter
VIP Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,570
From: Subabrew Crew
Car Info: Broken Subarus
Originally Posted by Superglue WRX
Oh noes, so we will only have 1,000 nuclear warheads instead of 2,000.

BFD! Good way to stop wasting money on **** we don't use.
Think of it as insurance. I really have no interest in seeing how well my insurance company will handle a claim. All I care is they have the resources in the event I file a claim.
Absolutely, the US military has been picked apart for 2+ decades, with just cause. Fortunately prior to 9/11, the world as a whole was relatively peaceful The mentality of doing more with less has completely shown that the US troops are stretched two thin to handle multiple conflicts with less resources. The deployment of the National Guard over seas has left a serious gap in security at home.
Unfortunately a new president will not change our enemies perception. Seeing as how the light at the end of the tunnel (if there ever was one) is far from reach; maybe becoming dimmer. Now, hardly seems to be the time to talk about reducing defense spending.
Old Aug 28, 2008 | 01:47 PM
  #6  
FW Motorsports's Avatar
iClub Silver Vendor
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,494
From: Participating in some Anarchy!
Car Info: 2005 LGT wagon
Originally Posted by Superglue WRX
Oh noes, so we will only have 1,000 nuclear warheads instead of 2,000.

BFD! Good way to stop wasting money on **** we don't use.
With this part of defense, I agree..how many times over do you have to be able to kill the entire planet.
Specially since we seem to lack the moral fortitude to use these weapons.
I was refering to whole fleets and divisions that are no more.
Old Aug 28, 2008 | 05:48 PM
  #7  
Superglue WRX's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 5,686
From: I was up above it, now I'm down in it
Car Info: New Government Motors SUV!
Originally Posted by ipozestu
Think of it as insurance. I really have no interest in seeing how well my insurance company will handle a claim. All I care is they have the resources in the event I file a claim.
Absolutely, the US military has been picked apart for 2+ decades, with just cause. Fortunately prior to 9/11, the world as a whole was relatively peaceful The mentality of doing more with less has completely shown that the US troops are stretched two thin to handle multiple conflicts with less resources. The deployment of the National Guard over seas has left a serious gap in security at home.
Unfortunately a new president will not change our enemies perception. Seeing as how the light at the end of the tunnel (if there ever was one) is far from reach; maybe becoming dimmer. Now, hardly seems to be the time to talk about reducing defense spending.
The key point is that our troops are stretch thin because they are out in other countries fighting wars that don't even involve the US. Not to mention, we are borrowing gobs of money from foreign countries to help pay for it. And we still can't even afford to issue out enough flack jackets and armored vehicles. This is a time where we need to seriously rethink where our money is going.

Think of this as insurance that we can't afford. We need a less expensive insurance policy. And seeing that no enemy's conventional military has stepped on US soil since WWII, I think we'll be OK. No size of army/navy personnel is going to deter a suicidal terrorist group, so deterrence by presence is a waste of money.

I'm all for having a strong military. And it is strong, not 1980's strong, but strong. We're not in the cold war anymore and our only immediate threat is terrorism which can't be fought in any any conventional battle, so it makes sense to hold off on funding.

And just in case I come of as some hippie liberal which I can understand after reading some of my own posts. I'm not. I spent 6 years in the Navy operating and maintaning the CIWS you see in my avatar. I have a lot of love for my country, but I don't like see our guys out there trying to turn Iraq into America Part 2 and getting killed in the process. I think it's time we start working on our countries own problems which are plenty.
Old Sep 2, 2008 | 09:54 AM
  #8  
joltdudeuc's Avatar
Old School
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 14,983
From: Union City
Car Info: '99 RBP GM6
I'm for the reduction of nukes, but I strongly feel we need troops at home, and in decent numbers.
Old Sep 2, 2008 | 10:07 AM
  #9  
SilverScoober02's Avatar
VIP Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,064
From: Detroit, Where the weak are killed and eaten...
Car Info: 02 Impreza WRX Sedan & 2008 GMC Sierra 4x4
Originally Posted by Superglue WRX
The key point is that our troops are stretch thin because they are out in other countries fighting wars that don't even involve the US. Not to mention, we are borrowing gobs of money from foreign countries to help pay for it. And we still can't even afford to issue out enough flack jackets and armored vehicles. This is a time where we need to seriously rethink where our money is going.

Think of this as insurance that we can't afford. We need a less expensive insurance policy. And seeing that no enemy's conventional military has stepped on US soil since WWII, I think we'll be OK. No size of army/navy personnel is going to deter a suicidal terrorist group, so deterrence by presence is a waste of money.

I'm all for having a strong military. And it is strong, not 1980's strong, but strong. We're not in the cold war anymore and our only immediate threat is terrorism which can't be fought in any any conventional battle, so it makes sense to hold off on funding.

And just in case I come of as some hippie liberal which I can understand after reading some of my own posts. I'm not. I spent 6 years in the Navy operating and maintaning the CIWS you see in my avatar. I have a lot of love for my country, but I don't like see our guys out there trying to turn Iraq into America Part 2 and getting killed in the process. I think it's time we start working on our countries own problems which are plenty.
Can't agree with this post any more.....

Well said...

I hate the fact that when you agree with a policy like this people on the other side of the fence label you with the hippie liberal america hating tag.....F*ckin hate that......I am a pro gun, pro-choice moderate that has voted both sides of the coin in the last 8 years. I base my vote on issues not party lines and television ads and I hate being branded by ignorant a**holes.

/rant off

Sorry had to get that off my chest... I feel better...
Old Sep 2, 2008 | 02:00 PM
  #10  
Superglue WRX's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 5,686
From: I was up above it, now I'm down in it
Car Info: New Government Motors SUV!
^^^

Yes, I hate partisan politics!!!
Old Sep 4, 2008 | 07:51 AM
  #11  
MonkeyKarma's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14
From: Chicago
Car Info: 2006 WRX Shagun, Wagun
Also what makes me mad is people sticking things where they don't belong. We get this crazy spending for pet projects in the larger bills that will pass so this way they can get funding. And then they take it from teh military because it is spending too much on a battle that we sent them to. But we have enough money to pay 3X the amount for contractors that are taking jobs from trained men and women in those areas. I will be curious to see what will happen when certain people are out of office and how the speding changes at that point.
Old Sep 4, 2008 | 07:56 AM
  #12  
SilverScoober02's Avatar
VIP Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,064
From: Detroit, Where the weak are killed and eaten...
Car Info: 02 Impreza WRX Sedan & 2008 GMC Sierra 4x4
Originally Posted by MonkeyKarma
Also what makes me mad is people sticking things where they don't belong. We get this crazy spending for pet projects in the larger bills that will pass so this way they can get funding. And then they take it from teh military because it is spending too much on a battle that we sent them to. But we have enough money to pay 3X the amount for contractors that are taking jobs from trained men and women in those areas. I will be curious to see what will happen when certain people are out of office and how the speding changes at that point.
That will be interesting although if I were you I wouldn't expect too much. I just think washington politics are so ingrained at this point that that sort of thing will continue to happen.

I do honestly believe though that regardless of who gets elected Obama or McCain the USA is gonna be so much better off.
Old Sep 4, 2008 | 08:29 AM
  #13  
STI RUSH's Avatar
BAM9 Ladies choice Carshow winner
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,810
From: Vallejo-Fairfield-Travis
Car Info: 13 FR-S/05 STI
I actually was responsible for both Peacekeeper and Minuteman nukes back in the day. And let me tell you; it sucks providing security or controlling forces to secure them. So, if he does disarm them, to me it sounds like a good deal. But, not having the air power, would totally jeopardize our security.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JFlipSubi916
Stereo & Security
2
Mar 19, 2012 04:43 PM
iLoqin
Teh Politics Forum
1
Mar 28, 2011 05:32 PM
mikasa
Stereo & Security
1
Feb 25, 2008 01:57 PM
Wingless Wonder
Videos
4
Jul 24, 2007 05:06 PM
SilverScoober02
Teh Politics Forum
2
May 3, 2007 12:15 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:50 AM.