As suggested in the rules, we welcome tin foil hat ideals but at least have some evidence instead of bashing like a fart in the wind.

Even the radical leftist group that presented the Nick Berg conspiracy theory had a slight connection with the white chair

So from this point forward... if you post a lame thought without substantial evidence, historical evidence or any source (even a source from Oregon college students will do) I’ll just lock it and let it die.

Thanks,

The Management.

 

Dang, so my military robot thread would not have stood up to these new standards?



Congrats on the wedding BTW :banana:

 

It would have because you presented a piece of evidence for us to feed on even though you had a stupid stance on the subject.

And thanks for the congrats!

 

THANK YOU!
On another note, is this supposed to be a cheap shot? I don't understand.

 

Evidence = link to some made up site with 100% BS on it?

Since Politics relies much on opinion, what's wrong with discussing political opinions/ viewpoints?

Is this the thought police or what?

 

hella you are one step from bannation watch your self.

i know every trick of the trade of trolling, so you arent pulling anything new with me. I can see thru your bull**** and i know what you are doing, and i will put an end to it. I have warned you upteen times, when the times comes it will be swift and unrelenting. I have gone out of my way to give you a 2nd, 3rd and 4th chance. There is a point of no return and you are about to run across that line screaming and hooting. Again i ask that you begin to contribute here and that you act your age (not not emotional age), if you choose to ignore the message you will be delt with.