Or photojournalism.
Interesting article:

http://michellemalkin.com/archives/003780.htm

Kinda makes you wonder how much of what we see is manipulated.

 

show me it actually in USA Today and i might beleive this conservative bull****

 

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washing...congress_x.htm

owned

 

It was probably only done because when they went to print the original photo in the low res they use for newsprint, her eyes all but turned into little black dots.
It does look pretty creepy in its online version, but I really think there are more important issues to be discussing.

nice distraction from the pending indictments though

 

Wow. I resized the picture much smaller in low res and it looked just fine after printing.

She has that constant serious business look on her face and they exploited it. Seems highly possible.

But something tells me it wasn't done intentionally to make her look evil. It just appears that way once you see the original photo. I'm not convinced.

 

Now this would be pushing the envelope.

 

+1 exactly

 

Hahaha you need some steam coming off her head too!

 

psoper and unregistered posting in the same thread... harks back to the good ol' days of teh politics when the libs ruled the masses

 

They only come back when I'm on the prowl for a fake.

Everyday when they come to I-Club they search "military" under "Salty" before anything else. If they see threads without a black dot they pounce.