Teh Politics Forum Rumors and lies and Teh Iraqi Info Minister and much much more...

Cheney's Halliburton Stock options:

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 12, 2005 | 05:35 AM
  #1  
lojasmo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 691
From: Being stalked by Salty
Car Info: Looking for a Liberty CRD
Cheney's Halliburton Stock options:

Up 3,000% Now worth $9,000,000

http://lautenberg.senate.gov/~lauten...005915804.html

<snip> In September 2003, the Congressional Research Service (CRS) issued a memorandum to Senator Lautenberg concluding that holding stock options while in elective office does constitute a "financial interest" regardless of whether the holder of the options will donate proceeds to charities. CRS also found that receiving deferred compensation is a financial interest.

The CRS report can be downloaded at:

http://lautenberg.senate.gov/Report.pdf

The CRS findings contradict Vice President Cheney's puzzling view that he does not have a financial interest in Halliburton. On the September 14, 2003 edition of Meet the Press in response to questions regarding his relationship with Halliburton where he was employed as CEO for five years, from 1995 to 2000, Vice President Cheney said:

"And since I left Halliburton to become George Bush's vice president, I've severed all my ties with the company, gotten rid of all my financial interest. I have no financial interest in Halliburton of any kind and haven't had, now, for over three years.
Old Oct 12, 2005 | 08:12 AM
  #2  
psoper's Avatar
250,000-mile Club President
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,770
From: Bizerkeley
Car Info: MBP 02 WRX wagon
Nothing to see here, the VP has no financial ties with Halliburton, move along......
Old Oct 12, 2005 | 08:24 AM
  #3  
jvick125's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 10,375
From: Monterey
Car Info: Sline
*goes to next thread*
Old Oct 12, 2005 | 08:26 AM
  #4  
dub2w's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,256
From: Blue-faced in a red state
Car Info: 04 Silver WRX Wagon
Originally Posted by psoper
Nothing to see here, the VP has no financial ties with Halliburton, move along......
haha! This type of ish is unbelievable. Honestly, our democracy can at times be utterly rediculous
Old Oct 12, 2005 | 01:11 PM
  #5  
FW Motorsports's Avatar
iClub Silver Vendor
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,494
From: Participating in some Anarchy!
Car Info: 2005 LGT wagon
For six years, I used to drive I-80 every day to/from work.
Every so often, I'd pass a middle-aged white collar type driving a white Ford Exploder with "Halliburton" on it.
Well, shortly after the "liberation" of Iraq, the Exploder became an Expedition.

I guess it's good to be connected to the King.

But, so what if Dick is making money.
It comes with the territory; no one was complaining when the last admin was profiteering off of our backs.
Old Oct 12, 2005 | 01:23 PM
  #6  
1reguL8NSTi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 9,198
From: I gotta have more cow bell!!!!
Car Info: 05 STi


Now everyone can laugh at this.
Old Oct 12, 2005 | 01:29 PM
  #7  
psoper's Avatar
250,000-mile Club President
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,770
From: Bizerkeley
Car Info: MBP 02 WRX wagon
Originally Posted by Oaf
....
But, so what if Dick is making money.
My problem isn't with him making money (well maybe a little of it is, I mean we pay his VP salary- he's supposed to be working for us, not them) but rather that he LIES about having no financial ties, we saw plenty of republicans up in arms over the last administrations lying....

Originally Posted by Oaf
no one was complaining when the last admin was profiteering off of our backs.
only republicans, they complained about everything clinton did from when he woke up till he went to bed.

Rational people didn't complain because it didn't happen- at least not as brazenly and openly as bushcheney inc. does business.

Please show me one instance where his administration is alleged to have been "profiteering off of our backs"
Old Oct 12, 2005 | 02:42 PM
  #8  
VIBEELEVEN's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,120
From: Napa, Ca.
Car Info: 03 WRX
So if you worked for google and had stock in the company, and later on ran for govenor and won, would you give up what you had fairly earned prior?
Heck no !
Welcome to capitalisim, where the smart make money and the dumb watch mtv.
Old Oct 12, 2005 | 03:36 PM
  #9  
psoper's Avatar
250,000-mile Club President
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,770
From: Bizerkeley
Car Info: MBP 02 WRX wagon
Originally Posted by VIBEELEVEN
So if you worked for google and had stock in the company, and later on ran for govenor and won, would you give up what you had fairly earned prior?
Heck no !
Welcome to capitalisim, where the smart make money and the dumb watch mtv.
Most states have what we call "conflict of interest laws" which restrict people holding office from getting payment from other interests, this way people don't worry about elected officials being beholden to interests apart from the office which they were elected to serve.

Maybe you wouldn't want to sell your google holdings, but you would probably have to in order to legally serve in the position you were elected to.

But suppose you were the hypothetical govenor who held onto his google stocks, and then suppose you gave google a no-bid contract to be the sole-source of seraching for all of your state government, that would just be good business right?

If this doesn't strike you as blatent corruption, I have a hard time imagining what would
Old Oct 12, 2005 | 03:50 PM
  #10  
MVWRX's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,312
From: UCIrvine
Car Info: '05 Crystal Grey Metallic WRX Sport Wagon
Originally Posted by VIBEELEVEN
So if you worked for google and had stock in the company, and later on ran for govenor and won, would you give up what you had fairly earned prior?

Uh, you'd sell the stock and end up with the cash...so you wouldn't give up what you fairly earned prior, you'd give up 'potential future' earnings...but that's a fair trade off considering you're trying to gain power.
Old Oct 12, 2005 | 03:57 PM
  #11  
VIBEELEVEN's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,120
From: Napa, Ca.
Car Info: 03 WRX
Originally Posted by MVWRX
Uh, you'd sell the stock and end up with the cash...so you wouldn't give up what you fairly earned prior, you'd give up 'potential future' earnings...but that's a fair trade off considering you're trying to gain power.
You're right.

Originally Posted by psoper
But suppose you were the hypothetical govenor who held onto his google stocks, and then suppose you gave google a no-bid contract to be the sole-source of seraching for all of your state government, that would just be good business right?

If this doesn't strike you as blatent corruption, I have a hard time imagining what would
You really can't link the two together like that, considering the circumstances for awarding the contract you speak of.

Last edited by VIBEELEVEN; Oct 12, 2005 at 05:05 PM.
Old Oct 12, 2005 | 05:04 PM
  #12  
VIBEELEVEN's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,120
From: Napa, Ca.
Car Info: 03 WRX
oops, double post, duh
Old Oct 12, 2005 | 06:53 PM
  #13  
lojasmo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 691
From: Being stalked by Salty
Car Info: Looking for a Liberty CRD
Originally Posted by VIBEELEVEN
You're right.


You really can't link the two together like that, considering the circumstances for awarding the contract you speak of.
Which circumstances are those, vibe?
Old Oct 12, 2005 | 08:08 PM
  #14  
VIBEELEVEN's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,120
From: Napa, Ca.
Car Info: 03 WRX
The fact that they already won the bid in 2001 for the pre-war planning of fighting oil fires, so it only made sense to go with the one who had already put together a plan, instead of starting from scratch. The clinton admin. did the same thing in when they awarded halliburton a contract in the balkens in 1992 and lost the bid in 1997, halliburton was awarded a no bid contract because it seemed foolish to switch mid stream.

Psst, What's the DFL?
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 05:22 AM
  #15  
lojasmo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 691
From: Being stalked by Salty
Car Info: Looking for a Liberty CRD
Originally Posted by VIBEELEVEN
The fact that they already won the bid in 2001 for the pre-war planning of fighting oil fires, so it only made sense to go with the one who had already put together a plan, instead of starting from scratch. The clinton admin. did the same thing in when they awarded halliburton a contract in the balkens in 1992 and lost the bid in 1997, halliburton was awarded a no bid contract because it seemed foolish to switch mid stream.

Psst, What's the DFL?
With the knowlege we have, however (the GAO reported that halliburton LOST 1/3 of the equipment for which it was responsible in Iraq, and also has a well documented record of inflating prices and fleecing the american people for large amounts of money) it seems foolhardy to keep awarding these contracts to halliburton subsidiaries.

DFL is the Deomcratic Farmer-Laborer party, Minnesota's version of the Democratic party.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SilverScoober02
Teh Politics Forum
15
Mar 14, 2007 03:37 PM
lojasmo
Teh Politics Forum
6
Jan 23, 2006 05:56 PM
SilverScoober02
Teh Politics Forum
5
Oct 31, 2004 09:38 AM
dub2w
Teh Politics Forum
12
Sep 8, 2004 02:52 PM
dub2w
Teh Politics Forum
1
Aug 17, 2004 01:58 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:28 PM.