Subaru General Anything about Subaru related that would not be more appropriate in another existing i-Club forum.

which turbo engine is better for modding - the 2.0 or 2.5? (was: Wrx Wagon Help)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 20, 2006 | 06:19 PM
  #1  
Drift My WRX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 72
From: Newport
Car Info: 2007 WRX Wagon
Wrx Wagon Help

Ok, I currently own a 2003 WRX, I love it, and couldn't imagine driving without AWD after this car. Well the car is a little small for me now, so I was thinking of buying the 2004/2005 WRX wagon, I mean it's the exact same car as mine, just with a hatchback pretty much, and I like how it looks... well I was at Subaru yesterday, and the salesman was giving me his pitch on the 2006 WRX wagons, I knew they put the 2.5 block in them, and that is supposedly a better engine and all, but I am pretty sure that the 2.0 block is better for high-power modifications, like it will handle more torque etc... than the 2.5 block, I basically want to get a WRX wagon, and get it to be pushing 330/340 hp and 330 torque, which engine will better suit my needs? Thanks guys.
Jon
Old Apr 20, 2006 | 07:33 PM
  #2  
sneezerboi's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,733
From: Double kal bi spicy
Car Info: 1998 Subaru Impreza 2.5RS
I think the 2.5L naturally puts out more torque due to the extra displacement. Have you taken the time to test drive the '06? If you're into wagons, have you test driven the '04/'05 Forester XT? Shares the same platform as the imprezas, comes w/the 2.5L, but has shorter (and stronger) gearing than the WRXs, resulting in quicker acceleration than WRXs. Due to it having the same platform, all mods that fit the Impreza fit the Forester as well.

AFAIK, the EJ20 in the USDM WRXs isn't exactly better for high-power mods than the 2.5L. However, the JDM EJ20 is. It features a semi-closed deck, allowing for higher reliable boost. The USDM EJ20 doesn't have the semi-closed deck.

If anything, the torque alone is worth going w/the 2.5L.
Old Apr 27, 2006 | 12:46 PM
  #3  
BlingBlingBlue's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,402
From: Bay Area
Car Info: 02 WRX wagon=dead; rollin' in a Craptastic Camry!
There is no replacement for displacement. *zips up flame suit*
Old Apr 27, 2006 | 01:55 PM
  #4  
MVWRX's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,312
From: UCIrvine
Car Info: '05 Crystal Grey Metallic WRX Sport Wagon
Wink

...but there's no seduction like forced induction...
Old Apr 27, 2006 | 03:10 PM
  #5  
BlingBlingBlue's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,402
From: Bay Area
Car Info: 02 WRX wagon=dead; rollin' in a Craptastic Camry!
Best of both worlds, baby!

Seriously, I drove my buddies Outback XT the other night, and the low end grunt of his 2.5 turbo is remarkably better than my 2.0. I can't speak to the modding potential *right now* but it stands to reason that the 2.5 liter has more potential with 25% more displacement and a factory 300hp in STi trim.
Old Apr 27, 2006 | 03:14 PM
  #6  
Imprezer's Avatar
Admin v2.0
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,965
From: Alameda, CA, USA
Car Info: 02 Black Legacy GT
I say 2.0 and I say that because of the redline. Nothing sucks more than low US STi redline. Anyone who have driven a WRX with JDM STi 2.0 motor will understand what I mean. And, since I don't beleive in built engines, if I had to choose between a stock US STi 2.5 and JDM STi 2.0, I would take JDM 2.0 STi motor anyday. If it is Spec C EJ207, I would not only take it over US 2.5L engine, but also giggle like a little girl while taking the 2.0.
Old Apr 27, 2006 | 03:33 PM
  #7  
RedStage's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,143
From: Yokohama, Japan
Car Info: Ver IV STi Wagon
/\ Amen
Old Apr 27, 2006 | 10:30 PM
  #8  
1sicwrx's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 881
From: Novato,CA
Car Info: Jaguar XJR, VW Corrado, 911 Carrera
Originally Posted by Imprezer
I say 2.0 and I say that because of the redline. Nothing sucks more than low US STi redline. Anyone who have driven a WRX with JDM STi 2.0 motor will understand what I mean. And, since I don't beleive in built engines, if I had to choose between a stock US STi 2.5 and JDM STi 2.0, I would take JDM 2.0 STi motor anyday. If it is Spec C EJ207, I would not only take it over US 2.5L engine, but also giggle like a little girl while taking the 2.0.
What he said^. I have driven in a 02 WRX with that motor(JDM STi 2.0), Ryan up at FLI in Santa Rosa had that motor in his car, that car freakin' pulled and the power band seemed like it would never end. It was great.
Old Apr 28, 2006 | 10:13 AM
  #9  
BlingBlingBlue's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,402
From: Bay Area
Car Info: 02 WRX wagon=dead; rollin' in a Craptastic Camry!
I definitely agree with regards to a JDM 2.0. I was thinking USDM 2.0 to USDM 2.5.
Old May 8, 2006 | 05:49 AM
  #10  
cudaeh's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 989
From: Automotive racist capitol of the world, Detroit.
Car Info: 2000 impreza 2.5 rs
usdm ej257 all the way.
forged crank standard
semi closed deck
nothing stays stock in my drive way for long.
Old May 8, 2006 | 11:08 AM
  #11  
Imprezer's Avatar
Admin v2.0
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,965
From: Alameda, CA, USA
Car Info: 02 Black Legacy GT
JDM is also semi closed and the cyliner walls actually have some meat on it. The crank is treated too.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AJBoost
Bay Area
2
Sep 23, 2006 08:00 PM
burndtjamb
Engine/Power - EJ20T (pre-2006 WRX and JDM)
5
Dec 18, 2005 07:32 PM
WickedSpeed
Engine/Power - EJ20T (pre-2006 WRX and JDM)
18
Mar 10, 2004 04:40 PM
STi City
Engine Management
10
Nov 1, 2003 03:36 PM
QR25DET
Subaru General
15
Oct 21, 2003 01:54 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:29 AM.