Engine/Power - non turbo (All non turbo Imprezas) Who needs a turbo when you have 2500cc? Cams, intakes, exhausts, etc. The 2.2L and 1.8L Subies are cool too.

And now it comes to this...

Old Jun 2, 2003 | 08:41 PM
  #1  
TVA's Avatar
TVA
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 207
From: Kailua
Car Info: Bugeye
And now it comes to this...

Posting in an N/A thread I have somewhat of a predesposition as to which way this is going to go, but I'll ask anyway. Next year when I graduate I plan on dumping a somewhat rediculous amount of money into my '02 2.5 and I'm debating between the Stage 2 or Stage 3 COBB shortblock, either of which will be mated to COBB heads and other COBB goodies. The stage 2 holds appeal in that an 11:1 comp. 8500 rpm 2.5 liter N/A motor can't be bad and may have a better chance at reliablility as apposed to the 8.2:1 (right?) comp (I'm assuming) 8500 rpm stage 3. The stage 2 would obviously be slightly more cost effective in that I would need less bolt-on's but let me know what you guys have to say. As always, thanks guys.

TVA
Old Jun 2, 2003 | 09:33 PM
  #2  
Kevin M's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 18,369
From: Reno, NV
Car Info: 1993/2000/2001 GF4 mostly red
Stage III is fr turbo, Stage II is for N/A. The 8.2:1 compression is much lower than stock. You'd have a hard time making the stock 165 horsepower at redline in that motor without FI.
Old Jun 3, 2003 | 06:44 AM
  #3  
TVA's Avatar
TVA
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 207
From: Kailua
Car Info: Bugeye
Oh... I must have not explained myself clearly enough because I'm thinking that you took my post as though I was a complete idiot... Lol. Anyway, I realise that the 8.2:1 is much lower than stock and I was planning on FI for the stage III, I just need to decide if I want to go all motor or if I want to boost the car, and those two choices are obviously represented with the stage II or stage III kits, respectively. So lets hear the classic battle guys, N/A vs. FI. Thanks for the quick response Ban, sorry I was a little unclear.

TVA
Old Jun 3, 2003 | 10:24 AM
  #4  
Kevin M's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 18,369
From: Reno, NV
Car Info: 1993/2000/2001 GF4 mostly red
No problem. I vote for boost if you can afford it, and NA if you just want to go down the path less traveled.

Oh yeah, reliability is purely a function of tuning with both those motors. They are equaly resistant to blowing up.
Old Jun 3, 2003 | 01:26 PM
  #5  
mysubaruimp's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,162
From: dover, NH
Car Info: 2001 sub. imp.
Turbo it!! turbos are fun!!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
imHELLAslow
NorCal Classifieds
26
Nov 18, 2008 06:34 PM
SilverScoober02
Teh Politics Forum
27
May 1, 2007 06:50 PM
asianboy101
Used Aftermarket Car Parts For Sale
0
Jan 7, 2007 05:44 PM
mav1c
New Aftermarket Car Parts For Sale
0
Nov 28, 2006 01:46 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:01 AM.