Engine/Power - non turbo (All non turbo Imprezas) Who needs a turbo when you have 2500cc? Cams, intakes, exhausts, etc. The 2.2L and 1.8L Subies are cool too.

And now it comes to this...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 2, 2003 | 08:41 PM
  #1  
TVA's Avatar
TVA
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 207
From: Kailua
Car Info: Bugeye
And now it comes to this...

Posting in an N/A thread I have somewhat of a predesposition as to which way this is going to go, but I'll ask anyway. Next year when I graduate I plan on dumping a somewhat rediculous amount of money into my '02 2.5 and I'm debating between the Stage 2 or Stage 3 COBB shortblock, either of which will be mated to COBB heads and other COBB goodies. The stage 2 holds appeal in that an 11:1 comp. 8500 rpm 2.5 liter N/A motor can't be bad and may have a better chance at reliablility as apposed to the 8.2:1 (right?) comp (I'm assuming) 8500 rpm stage 3. The stage 2 would obviously be slightly more cost effective in that I would need less bolt-on's but let me know what you guys have to say. As always, thanks guys.

TVA
Old Jun 2, 2003 | 09:33 PM
  #2  
Kevin M's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 18,369
From: Reno, NV
Car Info: 1993/2000/2001 GF4 mostly red
Stage III is fr turbo, Stage II is for N/A. The 8.2:1 compression is much lower than stock. You'd have a hard time making the stock 165 horsepower at redline in that motor without FI.
Old Jun 3, 2003 | 06:44 AM
  #3  
TVA's Avatar
TVA
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 207
From: Kailua
Car Info: Bugeye
Oh... I must have not explained myself clearly enough because I'm thinking that you took my post as though I was a complete idiot... Lol. Anyway, I realise that the 8.2:1 is much lower than stock and I was planning on FI for the stage III, I just need to decide if I want to go all motor or if I want to boost the car, and those two choices are obviously represented with the stage II or stage III kits, respectively. So lets hear the classic battle guys, N/A vs. FI. Thanks for the quick response Ban, sorry I was a little unclear.

TVA
Old Jun 3, 2003 | 10:24 AM
  #4  
Kevin M's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 18,369
From: Reno, NV
Car Info: 1993/2000/2001 GF4 mostly red
No problem. I vote for boost if you can afford it, and NA if you just want to go down the path less traveled.

Oh yeah, reliability is purely a function of tuning with both those motors. They are equaly resistant to blowing up.
Old Jun 3, 2003 | 01:26 PM
  #5  
mysubaruimp's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,162
From: dover, NH
Car Info: 2001 sub. imp.
Turbo it!! turbos are fun!!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
imHELLAslow
NorCal Classifieds
26
Nov 18, 2008 06:34 PM
SilverScoober02
Teh Politics Forum
27
May 1, 2007 06:50 PM
asianboy101
Used Aftermarket Car Parts For Sale
0
Jan 7, 2007 05:44 PM
mav1c
New Aftermarket Car Parts For Sale
0
Nov 28, 2006 01:46 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:10 AM.