Best Uppipe?
Token Toyota Mod
iTrader: (50)
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 52,306
From: Palo Alto, CA
Car Info: Something german
Originally Posted by Urabus02
That ERZ upipe looks like a great deal. Does anyone know whether or not it'll pass smog in California w/ the stock downpipe and catalytic converter?
Originally Posted by Urabus02
That ERZ upipe looks like a great deal. Does anyone know whether or not it'll pass smog in California w/ the stock downpipe and catalytic converter?
I dont think you will pass the visual with that pipe but the upipe cat is only used for cold start emissions so you should be ok with the sniffer as long as they dont do a cold start test. You would have the best chance of passing the visual with the STI upipe (I'm picking mine up tomorrow). The best price I've found for a new STI pipe is $275 at this site http://www.subaruwrxparts.com/wrx-drivetrain.html.
Last edited by MO REX; Aug 26, 2004 at 07:46 PM.
No. An uppipe is an uppipe is an uppipe. You might enjoy the Uppipe FAQ I made on another forum.
You clearly worked hard on that FAQ, but it contains a good deal of conjecture and not much supporting evidence. Gutting the stock uppipe can be a recipe for disaster in the wrong hands; any "dings," scrapes or thinning of the walls caused by dremelling out the catalytic material has the potential to become a hot spot, causing uneven heating and cooling (and premature failure of the pipe).
As for the coated vs. uncoated issue, this is missing several of the pro/con arguments; for instance, keeping that heat in the pipe keeps it out of the engine compartment (always a plus with a TMIC). However, excessive EGT can cook your turbo, so proper engine management (not just an MBC) is a necessity.
Finally, there is the contradictory idea that "an uppipe is an uppipe" yet that fittment itself is crucial. There is no way that all of the 3rd-party uppipe makers out there create products with the exact same design and fabrication tolerances and standards; the idea that any old cheap one is just as good as a Crucial Racing or Helix, as good as something that has been race-tested and proven, is pretty laughable (as is the idea that the installation itself is more important than the design of the pipe). It behooves anyone willing to make such a drastic change to their engine's design and performance to do a great deal of research and comparison, and not just treat an uppipe as "seen one, seen e'm all."
As for the coated vs. uncoated issue, this is missing several of the pro/con arguments; for instance, keeping that heat in the pipe keeps it out of the engine compartment (always a plus with a TMIC). However, excessive EGT can cook your turbo, so proper engine management (not just an MBC) is a necessity.
Finally, there is the contradictory idea that "an uppipe is an uppipe" yet that fittment itself is crucial. There is no way that all of the 3rd-party uppipe makers out there create products with the exact same design and fabrication tolerances and standards; the idea that any old cheap one is just as good as a Crucial Racing or Helix, as good as something that has been race-tested and proven, is pretty laughable (as is the idea that the installation itself is more important than the design of the pipe). It behooves anyone willing to make such a drastic change to their engine's design and performance to do a great deal of research and comparison, and not just treat an uppipe as "seen one, seen e'm all."
Last edited by meilers; Aug 29, 2004 at 09:36 PM.
Originally Posted by meilers
You clearly worked hard on that FAQ, but it contains a good deal of conjecture and not much supporting evidence. Gutting the stock uppipe can be a recipe for disaster in the wrong hands; any "dings," scrapes or thinning of the walls caused by dremelling out the catalytic material has the potential to become a hot spot, causing uneven heating and cooling (and premature failure of the pipe).
sounds like you've never done it yourself. i've done three. the walls of the pipe are not made out of tissue paper.
As for the coated vs. uncoated issue, this is missing several of the pro/con arguments; for instance, keeping that heat in the pipe keeps it out of the engine compartment (always a plus with a TMIC). However, excessive EGT can cook your turbo, so proper engine management (not just an MBC) is a necessity.
Finally, there is the contradictory idea that "an uppipe is an uppipe" yet that fittment itself is crucial. There is no way that all of the 3rd-party uppipe makers out there create products with the exact same design and fabrication tolerances and standards; the idea that any old cheap one is just as good as a Crucial Racing or Helix, as good as something that has been race-tested and proven, is pretty laughable (as is the idea that the installation itself is more important than the design of the pipe). It behooves anyone willing to make such a drastic change to their engine's design and performance to do a great deal of research and comparison, and not just treat an uppipe as "seen one, seen e'm all."
I just found this thread.
I guarantee a Crucial uppipe has a far smoother interior and flows much better than the STi. Have you ever seen the welds on the niterior of the STi pipe? This subject was covered before here. https://www.i-club.com/forums/showth...hlight=crucial
Read what Dallas P&P has to say.
I guarantee a Crucial uppipe has a far smoother interior and flows much better than the STi. Have you ever seen the welds on the niterior of the STi pipe? This subject was covered before here. https://www.i-club.com/forums/showth...hlight=crucial
Read what Dallas P&P has to say.
Originally Posted by misterx
Have you ever seen the welds on the niterior of the STi pipe?
How much HP do you think I would have gained over my STI upipe if I would have bought a Crucial upipe? Im not saying the Crucial pipe isnt great or anything because it does look like a great pipe (possibly the best) but I doubt there would be much if any difference in performance.
Last edited by MO REX; Nov 6, 2004 at 09:23 PM.
Originally Posted by misterx
I'm not sure you'd gain HP but I know you'd spool up a lot faster.
I'm not trying to be an a$$ but exactly how do you know? Have you run both and seen a difference or do you just think you know?
Dont take this the wrong way, I'm just curious.
Here's my issue with upipes. The upipe curls around cery close to the engine, i don't remember the number of the cylinder it is closest to. If there is no heat shield then there is excess heat radiating into the engine and on one cylinder more than the other. In my opinion, and possibly in the opinion of others, that is a bad thing. Here's my question: does the coating on the crucial pipe keep the heat in the pipe and radiates less of it, or does it radiate more of it out, or does it just retain it untill the engine can cool down. If the pipe gets hotter and it radiates it out then a serious issue with the engine will develop.


