sti or svt (1/4-mile)
Originally Posted by 2002 WRX 4 SALE
94-95 = 240 hp. little underrated
96-98 = 305 hp
99 and 01 = 320 hp
2003-04 = 430 hp (they are underrated)
03-04 mach 1 = even more underrated. it is possible for a stock mach to beat a stock sti. it's a drivers race. it is an 01 cobra motor with the ram air intake ans just improved over the years. they have closer to 350 hp and 360 tq. and yes i've seen the slips of ones that ran 13.1 stock.
and any 96+ bolt-on cobras can take an sti. they are dohc and redline at 6800.
96-98 = 305 hp
99 and 01 = 320 hp
2003-04 = 430 hp (they are underrated)
03-04 mach 1 = even more underrated. it is possible for a stock mach to beat a stock sti. it's a drivers race. it is an 01 cobra motor with the ram air intake ans just improved over the years. they have closer to 350 hp and 360 tq. and yes i've seen the slips of ones that ran 13.1 stock.
and any 96+ bolt-on cobras can take an sti. they are dohc and redline at 6800.
Originally Posted by 1reguL8NSTi
I hate to break it to you man but your devotion to Ford is compromising your statistics. I almost bought an 04 Cobra over my STi and they're rated at 390 hp. Check your states that's straight from Ford. It may be a little underrated but I GUARANTEE you they DO NOT make 430. I raced a Mach 1 at my school and wiped his *** pretty bad (he may have been a bad driver but regardless).
hate to to break it to you though lol. they do have 425-430 completely stock. for insurance reasons they underrate the cars. I GUARANTEEEE THEY DOOOO. go look at a dyno of a stock 03 cobra. they make 360-370 TO THE WHEEEEEEEEELS STOCKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK. meaning = 430 Hp !!!! thatd be a little pathetic 390 hp for a s/c v8? my car's got 360 n/a.
you know camaros and trans ams are underrated as well righhtttt? lol. SS/Ws6 dyno 300-315 to the wheel stock.
Originally Posted by 2002 WRX 4 SALE
hate to to break it to you though lol. they do have 425-430 completely stock. for insurance reasons they underrate the cars. I GUARANTEEEE THEY DOOOO. go look at a dyno of a stock 03 cobra. they make 360-370 TO THE WHEEEEEEEEELS STOCKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK. meaning = 430 Hp !!!! thatd be a little pathetic 390 hp for a s/c v8? my car's got 360 n/a.
you know camaros and trans ams are underrated as well righhtttt? lol. SS/Ws6 dyno 300-315 to the wheel stock.
you know camaros and trans ams are underrated as well righhtttt? lol. SS/Ws6 dyno 300-315 to the wheel stock.
Right......................whatever you have to tell yourself. I'm not going to sit here and argue about it otherwise I'd go to the "skyline" thread.
Originally Posted by 2002 WRX 4 SALE
03-04 mach 1 = even more underrated. it is possible for a stock mach to beat a stock sti. it's a drivers race. it is an 01 cobra motor with the ram air intake ans just improved over the years. they have closer to 350 hp and 360 tq. and yes i've seen the slips of ones that ran 13.1 stock.
Originally Posted by 1reguL8NSTi
Right......................whatever you have to tell yourself. I'm not going to sit here and argue about it otherwise I'd go to the "skyline" thread.
and the shaker hood isnt a joke or for looks. mach 1s are fast. that thing adds another 20hp, it's part of the new intake. exhaust and geared mach1s run mid 12s all day.
Originally Posted by 2002 WRX 4 SALE
well then. you are stupid. i am not making it up. you only know what you wanna know.
and the shaker hood isnt a joke or for looks. mach 1s are fast. that thing adds another 20hp, it's part of the new intake. exhaust and geared mach1s run mid 12s all day.
and the shaker hood isnt a joke or for looks. mach 1s are fast. that thing adds another 20hp, it's part of the new intake. exhaust and geared mach1s run mid 12s all day.
I don't really think the cobra has 430 hp...
http://motortrend.com/roadtests/coup...et/index3.html
That would be pretty sad for a 430 hp car to do a 13.1 and a 350 hp car do a 13.0.
Wow look what they managed in the sti and evo:
http://motortrend.com/roadtests/seda...ub/index2.html
http://motortrend.com/roadtests/coup...et/index3.html
That would be pretty sad for a 430 hp car to do a 13.1 and a 350 hp car do a 13.0.
Wow look what they managed in the sti and evo:
http://motortrend.com/roadtests/seda...ub/index2.html
Originally Posted by VIBEELEVEN
I don't really think the cobra has 430 hp...
http://motortrend.com/roadtests/coup...et/index3.html
That would be pretty sad for a 430 hp car to do a 13.1 and a 350 hp car do a 13.0.
Wow look what they managed in the sti and evo:
http://motortrend.com/roadtests/seda...ub/index2.html
http://motortrend.com/roadtests/coup...et/index3.html
That would be pretty sad for a 430 hp car to do a 13.1 and a 350 hp car do a 13.0.
Wow look what they managed in the sti and evo:
http://motortrend.com/roadtests/seda...ub/index2.html
Originally Posted by 1reguL8NSTi
My point exactly. I hope it does that way I can say my car runs the same time as a car with over 100 hp more.
you guys are comparing stats from the worst magazine of all.
done replying on this thread
03 cobra = 430 hp. FACT. again i'm not gonna go get you a link but go to stangnet.com. do a search in the SVT forum for STOCK DYNO and i promise you, 360+ to the wheels.
VIP Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,648
From: SBAIC-South BayArea Impreza Club-Campbell, CA-Thur
Car Info: 2003 PSM STi
<sigh> dontcha just looooove all the bench racers that are so hooked on stats that they have "heard" from the neighbors, cousins, friends, sisters, boyfriends brother.......
all, I am gonna say is HP numbers dont really mean diddly squat as to how fast a car is......you have to take into account things like:
-power to weight ratio (cobra:Curb weight, 3780)(STI: Curb weight, ~3350)
-engine torque at RPM
-transmissions
-final drive ratios
-temp./humidity/barometric pressure
-fuel used
etc.
my point being, just because a car has 500hp, does NOT mean that it will win in a race with a smaller, lighter, car with less hp.
Who remembers the episode of "Top Gear" someone posted on this site, with the Ariel Atom? That car has a Civic SI motor IIRC, curb weight of about 1800lbs (or less), and was Like a second or 2 FASTER around their test track than the Porche 911GT3, and the Lambo Gallardo/Murcialago (also including acceleration times from 0mph).
Lemme see if I can find the link..... edit: http://www.arielmotor.co.uk/04/press.htm
Here's a link to the Ariel Atom Press website, it contains links to 2 or 3 different videos from Top Gear, as well as the answer to every stat. question you may have on this car......BTW I WAS right about the Honda i-4 Vtec engine 220BHP 0-60 = 2.91sec. (I wanna see ANY Mustang....Cobra or not see times that fast. (fullon dragsters dont count either, this car is street legal.)
Here's a nice pic for any skeptics viewing pleasure:
"Top Gear Power laps time table"
-Ted
all, I am gonna say is HP numbers dont really mean diddly squat as to how fast a car is......you have to take into account things like:
-power to weight ratio (cobra:Curb weight, 3780)(STI: Curb weight, ~3350)
-engine torque at RPM
-transmissions
-final drive ratios
-temp./humidity/barometric pressure
-fuel used
etc.
my point being, just because a car has 500hp, does NOT mean that it will win in a race with a smaller, lighter, car with less hp.
Who remembers the episode of "Top Gear" someone posted on this site, with the Ariel Atom? That car has a Civic SI motor IIRC, curb weight of about 1800lbs (or less), and was Like a second or 2 FASTER around their test track than the Porche 911GT3, and the Lambo Gallardo/Murcialago (also including acceleration times from 0mph).
Lemme see if I can find the link..... edit: http://www.arielmotor.co.uk/04/press.htm
Here's a link to the Ariel Atom Press website, it contains links to 2 or 3 different videos from Top Gear, as well as the answer to every stat. question you may have on this car......BTW I WAS right about the Honda i-4 Vtec engine 220BHP 0-60 = 2.91sec. (I wanna see ANY Mustang....Cobra or not see times that fast. (fullon dragsters dont count either, this car is street legal.)
Here's a nice pic for any skeptics viewing pleasure:

"Top Gear Power laps time table"
-Ted
Last edited by GotBoost?; Oct 10, 2005 at 06:07 PM.
VIP Member
iTrader: (38)
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,196
From: Rockin my 6th Suby in the 808 in the past decade!
Car Info: 01 Impreza RSTi, 08 Evo MR, and 13 XV
Originally Posted by mr.bled
alright i was just wondering if an sti can take a cobra on the 1/4 keep in mind that they are both still sock thanx.
See what you started noob.......
So anyways a lot of people like to compare cars in a 1/4 mile on who can beat who. I believe given stock on stock both drivers having the same abilities (both excellent drivers for their particular car) the sti will notch out the win in a 1/4 mile. My reasons being TRACTION. The sti will bite down in the first 60 ft or so while the mustang will hunt for it for the first 60. But with this being said when the mustang finally finds traction its now playing a catch up game, which if you have noticed the mustang usually catches up and has a higher top end speed than the sti at the end of the 1/4. Now given you add another 100 ft to the track the mustang will win hands down, but this is not a given factor. Now if we want to even the playing field and slap on some slicks on a mustang again hands down the win will go to the mustang. Both cars are great in there own little world but come on now lets compare apples with apples. As far as a STI being a 1/4 mile car I would say yes and no. No because it was designed for the rally circuit and yes just because drag racing is an american past time we all love to do it so why not. Hope this helps with the little debate going on here these are just my opinions and mine only if you dont like them oh well thats your problem.
Originally Posted by GotBoost?
BTW I WAS right about the Honda i-4 Vtec engine 220BHP 0-60 = 2.91sec. (I wanna see ANY Mustang....Cobra or not see times that fast. (fullon dragsters dont count either, this car is street legal.)


