What comes after a WRX
VIP Member
iTrader: (23)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,969
From: Fremont
Car Info: 1999 2.5RS / 2004 Forester X
Originally Posted by supertek75
I'm surprised no one is saying anything about the S2000. Could it possibly be just a Civic S2K?
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,670
From: East Bay / Pomona
Car Info: '02 PSM WRX
Originally Posted by supertek75
I'm surprised no one is saying anything about the S2000. Could it possibly be just a Civic S2K?
Originally Posted by STi-owns-evo
I really really don't like S2000, especially the new ones with the stupidly made powerband... Where you hit peak hp at around 8k?
my wrx makes peak hp at 7k =\
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,670
From: East Bay / Pomona
Car Info: '02 PSM WRX
Originally Posted by dynamicprojeKtz
i didnt find the powerband to stupidly made. go for a ride in one. its not a bad car at all
Similar numbers are for the '05 (2.2L). Which makes peak power @ 6800 RPM giving them 700 RPM after peak HP, and peak torque @ 6500 RPM, giving you a bit more torque room at 2k until redline. (Yes, the redline was altered for higher displacement from a 9000 RPM engine to an 8500 RPM)
Originally Posted by AzN121184
my wrx makes peak hp at 7k =\
As for a stock WRX (MY 2002), you hit peak power @ 6000 RPM giving 1k RPM through redline, and peak torque @ 4000 giving you 3k to play with.
Originally Posted by dynamicprojeKtz
i didnt find the powerband to stupidly made. go for a ride in one. its not a bad car at all
It would be interesting to try the new S2000 though since the engine has been re-worked.
W.R.T. what to buy next, my GF has decided that she likes the Lotus Elise. She has already been for a ride in one and says she loves it - so who am I to argue
I figure a used Forester or Legacy would make a good utility vehicle to pair up with a toy car.
Last edited by Lorry; Apr 5, 2006 at 08:27 AM.
the artist formerly known as mcdrama
iTrader: (23)
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,428
From: Santa Cruz Mountains, CA.
Car Info: WRBP 2015 WRX Premium/CVT
Originally Posted by STi-owns-evo
Damn, if it hits peak hp then, you got tuned really retardedly. Who would want their peak power @ redline? I think my rex hits max power around 4300 RPM
As for a stock WRX (MY 2002), you hit peak power @ 6000 RPM giving 1k RPM through redline, and peak torque @ 4000 giving you 3k to play with.
As for a stock WRX (MY 2002), you hit peak power @ 6000 RPM giving 1k RPM through redline, and peak torque @ 4000 giving you 3k to play with.

<flame on>
HP is a product (see wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horse_power ) of torque and really is not all that significant. Torque is what matters.
Yes the Honda motors are high reving, and the max torque and HP is up around 6-7K RPM which does suck.
The WRX reachs peak torque around 4K RPM, and peak HP around 6200RPM, that is both stock and tuned. I have been tuned by both Gruppe-S and EQ, the peaks were in the same area on both tunes.
Just look at some dyno graphs and you'll see that the torque curve and HP curve are very different.
</flame off>
Anyway, point being: peak power is not the same as peak HP.
I would still get an STi if I totaled my WRX.
Originally Posted by STi-owns-evo
I have driven one, and I didn't like the feeling at all. Oh, sorry, according to edmunds, it makes peak power @ 8300 RPM (for the 2.0L ). So, you have like 700 RPM to go through. And peak torque is @ 7500 RPM which gives you a whole 1.5k to go through.
Similar numbers are for the '05 (2.2L). Which makes peak power @ 6800 RPM giving them 700 RPM after peak HP, and peak torque @ 6500 RPM, giving you a bit more torque room at 2k until redline. (Yes, the redline was altered for higher displacement from a 9000 RPM engine to an 8500 RPM)
Damn, if it hits peak hp then, you got tuned really retardedly. Who would want their peak power @ redline? I think my rex hits max power around 4300 RPM
As for a stock WRX (MY 2002), you hit peak power @ 6000 RPM giving 1k RPM through redline, and peak torque @ 4000 giving you 3k to play with.
Similar numbers are for the '05 (2.2L). Which makes peak power @ 6800 RPM giving them 700 RPM after peak HP, and peak torque @ 6500 RPM, giving you a bit more torque room at 2k until redline. (Yes, the redline was altered for higher displacement from a 9000 RPM engine to an 8500 RPM)
Damn, if it hits peak hp then, you got tuned really retardedly. Who would want their peak power @ redline? I think my rex hits max power around 4300 RPM
As for a stock WRX (MY 2002), you hit peak power @ 6000 RPM giving 1k RPM through redline, and peak torque @ 4000 giving you 3k to play with.
really now....
Have you been tuned yet?

btw, jayme, use that money and buy my wrx!
Last edited by AzN121184; Apr 5, 2006 at 09:59 AM.
Originally Posted by 02BlackWRX
i'd put the money as a down payment for an E46 M3 or an E39 M5
If I was just gonna use the insurance money and not spend $20K extra i'd get an evo hands down
If I was just gonna use the insurance money and not spend $20K extra i'd get an evo hands down
E39 M5 alllll the way.
that or use it as a downpayment for a 1995 911 turbo.
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,670
From: East Bay / Pomona
Car Info: '02 PSM WRX
Originally Posted by mcdrama
you need to get y0 head checked 
<flame on>
HP is a product (see wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horse_power ) of torque and really is not all that significant. Torque is what matters.
Yes the Honda motors are high reving, and the max torque and HP is up around 6-7K RPM which does suck.
The WRX reachs peak torque around 4K RPM, and peak HP around 6200RPM, that is both stock and tuned. I have been tuned by both Gruppe-S and EQ, the peaks were in the same area on both tunes.
Just look at some dyno graphs and you'll see that the torque curve and HP curve are very different.
</flame off>
Anyway, point being: peak power is not the same as peak HP.
I would still get an STi if I totaled my WRX.

<flame on>
HP is a product (see wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horse_power ) of torque and really is not all that significant. Torque is what matters.
Yes the Honda motors are high reving, and the max torque and HP is up around 6-7K RPM which does suck.
The WRX reachs peak torque around 4K RPM, and peak HP around 6200RPM, that is both stock and tuned. I have been tuned by both Gruppe-S and EQ, the peaks were in the same area on both tunes.
Just look at some dyno graphs and you'll see that the torque curve and HP curve are very different.
</flame off>
Anyway, point being: peak power is not the same as peak HP.
I would still get an STi if I totaled my WRX.

IIRC, HP is what... torque X (engine speed/5252)? That's why all dynos will intersect at 5252 RPM. You agree with my statement by saying "Honda motors are high reving, and the max torque and HP is up around 6-7K RPM which does suck." Which just proved my point on why I didn't like the S2000.
Let's just say I've been tuned by Renick Motorsports, Gruppe-S, and Vishnu, and I know how the dynos look. Useable power is what you want, and the S2000 doesn't deliver that since as soon as you hit it, oh crap, gotta shift.
Originally Posted by AzN121184
really now....
Have you been tuned yet?
btw, jayme, use that money and buy my wrx!
Have you been tuned yet?
btw, jayme, use that money and buy my wrx!
Here's my old dyno, please realize it is hard to read since torque & HP are on different scales. Note that my peak HP is around 4k and my peak torque is around 6k. It does not appear @ redline.
Last edited by STi-owns-evo; Apr 5, 2006 at 10:41 AM.


