Subaru's dynoing at ATP tommorow from 10 - 4ish
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,962
From: watching you get smaller...in my rear-view
Car Info: 02 STi
I dont think they are trying to prove tuners. It's more of a grudge match now 
Joe, better loose some pounds...Alex doesnt look that heavy. LOL
-freddie

Joe, better loose some pounds...Alex doesnt look that heavy. LOL
-freddie
I don't need more cowbell dammit!
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,203
From: Equally as important as Walter
Car Info: E82
Sorry to bring this back up again but I have finally read the whole thread.
First, I wasnt at the shootout, but I recall reading that Shiv went first and Bill went last. On a very hot day with no fans, the time period between the two runs could have had a great deal to do with the detonation. Even with a cool down run, Bill was probably working with a much more heatsoaked car then Shiv was.
Second, what good does a basemap ECU reflash do? If there is going to be a comparason between tuners products, it should be between the products the customer leaves the tuner with. Who would buy just a stock basemap and not get it tuned? I know that you cant even do that at i-speed, their reflash comes with, if im not mistaken, either 1 hour of dyno tuning or 2 hours of road tuning. The test should include a run at the baseline map and then another 2 or 3 runs to allow the tuner to work out any problems with the basemap. That, in my mind, would produce the best results to allow for a judgement of the best tuner. All this test has done is test for the product.
And finally, there needs to be more specific rules as to determine what exactly makes you win. Peak HP anf TQ numbers really dont mean much, the A/F ratio, knock, and the powerband as a whole should be taken into account to determine the winner. Possibly even a winner should not be declared, display the dyno plots of all the factors and let the consumer decide for themselves who they think is the best tuner and who they would choose to tune their cars.
First, I wasnt at the shootout, but I recall reading that Shiv went first and Bill went last. On a very hot day with no fans, the time period between the two runs could have had a great deal to do with the detonation. Even with a cool down run, Bill was probably working with a much more heatsoaked car then Shiv was.
Second, what good does a basemap ECU reflash do? If there is going to be a comparason between tuners products, it should be between the products the customer leaves the tuner with. Who would buy just a stock basemap and not get it tuned? I know that you cant even do that at i-speed, their reflash comes with, if im not mistaken, either 1 hour of dyno tuning or 2 hours of road tuning. The test should include a run at the baseline map and then another 2 or 3 runs to allow the tuner to work out any problems with the basemap. That, in my mind, would produce the best results to allow for a judgement of the best tuner. All this test has done is test for the product.
And finally, there needs to be more specific rules as to determine what exactly makes you win. Peak HP anf TQ numbers really dont mean much, the A/F ratio, knock, and the powerband as a whole should be taken into account to determine the winner. Possibly even a winner should not be declared, display the dyno plots of all the factors and let the consumer decide for themselves who they think is the best tuner and who they would choose to tune their cars.
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 439
From: Blackhawk, CA
Car Info: 996 Turbo,Gallardo,BMW 335,125cc shifter kart,etc
Originally posted by jewpac42
First, I wasnt at the shootout, but I recall reading that Shiv went first and Bill went last. On a very hot day with no fans, the time period between the two runs could have had a great deal to do with the detonation. Even with a cool down run, Bill was probably working with a much more heatsoaked car then Shiv was.
First, I wasnt at the shootout, but I recall reading that Shiv went first and Bill went last. On a very hot day with no fans, the time period between the two runs could have had a great deal to do with the detonation. Even with a cool down run, Bill was probably working with a much more heatsoaked car then Shiv was.
My 2c,
Shiv
________
Roor Bong
Last edited by Vishnu; Mar 7, 2011 at 04:05 AM.
I don't need more cowbell dammit!
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,203
From: Equally as important as Walter
Car Info: E82
Im not trying to take anything away from you Shiv, clearly in these conditions your base map ECU was the best. However, I was just suggesting maybe another test that measures tuning ability as opposed to who has the best baseline product. And as far as the fans go, like I said, I wasnt there so I really dont know, all I saw was that smaller one that you brought from your shop.
@Stoptech
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,416
From: San Francisco, CA
Car Info: 2002 WRX Wagon
Originally posted by Vishnu
No fans? I recall seeing 3. Heatsoak isn't an issue when there are 10-15 minutes between ECU tests. FWIW, even with 1 minute cool down periods between runs, the dyno results (on the same ECU were repeatable and consistent.
My 2c,
Shiv
No fans? I recall seeing 3. Heatsoak isn't an issue when there are 10-15 minutes between ECU tests. FWIW, even with 1 minute cool down periods between runs, the dyno results (on the same ECU were repeatable and consistent.
My 2c,
Shiv
dyno conditions, important facts, and the story in general really seemed to get distorted somehow. one could almost imply that some people are trying to make certain companies look bad.
Admin v2.0
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,965
From: Alameda, CA, USA
Car Info: 02 Black Legacy GT
It's so funny how multiple fans can magically disappear as the story gets told...
The event was organized by someone. The event went well. Then, before that someone posts the results, bunch of monkeys that were not even there, jump to conclusions. Then other monkeys, read "jumped" conclusions and give their conclusions to people.
At the end, there is a whole bunch of misinformation brought to you by those who have really nothing to do with it.
Victories get assigned. Foes get labeled. Everyone pissed off.
Did not you guys notice that i-Speed even once "accepted" the victory that monkeys assigned to them? Doesn't that tell that even they are waiting for the official results?
Now, there are fans disappearing.
@Stoptech
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,416
From: San Francisco, CA
Car Info: 2002 WRX Wagon
Originally posted by jewpac42
Im not trying to take anything away from you Shiv, clearly in these conditions your base map ECU was the best. However, I was just suggesting maybe another test that measures tuning ability as opposed to who has the best baseline product. And as far as the fans go, like I said, I wasnt there so I really dont know, all I saw was that smaller one that you brought from your shop.
Im not trying to take anything away from you Shiv, clearly in these conditions your base map ECU was the best. However, I was just suggesting maybe another test that measures tuning ability as opposed to who has the best baseline product. And as far as the fans go, like I said, I wasnt there so I really dont know, all I saw was that smaller one that you brought from your shop.
if you are still bent on finding out who is the "best" tuner, the best thing to do would be to pick packages from each tuner that are in the same price ranges and test them head to head in a scientifically controlled manner. from there, an educated and unbiased party (if there is such a thing) could help interpret the results.
what we are talking about will also take quite a bit of resources (time, effort, and money) from an unbiased party to make this happen.
one last thing to keep in mind is that tuning is not the mysterious witchcraft that people seem to expect. it is entirely possible that more than one tuner can tune any given engine setup to within a very close percentage of what it is capable of. it is not rocket science, it is not witchcraft, it is a skill that is acquired through experience.
I don't need more cowbell dammit!
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,203
From: Equally as important as Walter
Car Info: E82
Originally posted by Steppin Razor
the problem with that is that having the best baseline product has everything to do with who is the "best" tuner. rigging up some wacky setup on a wrx and seeing who can tune it the best would make no sense because you'd have to limit the amount of dyno runs each tuner could take. and more than likely it would take all day. what each of these tuners hope to do is provide well thought out packages that increase the performance of the car as a whole. therefore each tuner will choose whatever parts they deem necessary to acheive their goal and then tune the spark, fuel, and boost to safely accommodate those modifications.
if you are still bent on finding out who is the "best" tuner, the best thing to do would be to pick packages from each tuner that are in the same price ranges and test them head to head in a scientifically controlled manner. from there, an educated and unbiased party (if there is such a thing) could help interpret the results.
what we are talking about will also take quite a bit of resources (time, effort, and money) from an unbiased party to make this happen.
one last thing to keep in mind is that tuning is not the mysterious witchcraft that people seem to expect. it is entirely possible that more than one tuner can tune any given engine setup to within a very close percentage of what it is capable of. it is not rocket science, it is not witchcraft, it is a skill that is acquired through experience.
the problem with that is that having the best baseline product has everything to do with who is the "best" tuner. rigging up some wacky setup on a wrx and seeing who can tune it the best would make no sense because you'd have to limit the amount of dyno runs each tuner could take. and more than likely it would take all day. what each of these tuners hope to do is provide well thought out packages that increase the performance of the car as a whole. therefore each tuner will choose whatever parts they deem necessary to acheive their goal and then tune the spark, fuel, and boost to safely accommodate those modifications.
if you are still bent on finding out who is the "best" tuner, the best thing to do would be to pick packages from each tuner that are in the same price ranges and test them head to head in a scientifically controlled manner. from there, an educated and unbiased party (if there is such a thing) could help interpret the results.
what we are talking about will also take quite a bit of resources (time, effort, and money) from an unbiased party to make this happen.
one last thing to keep in mind is that tuning is not the mysterious witchcraft that people seem to expect. it is entirely possible that more than one tuner can tune any given engine setup to within a very close percentage of what it is capable of. it is not rocket science, it is not witchcraft, it is a skill that is acquired through experience.
Guest
Posts: n/a
You all sound like a bunch of ego-maniacs.
All bent out of shape because you think you know more than the next guy....
No matter what you say or do... people have opinions... about whoever they think is better at what they do .....or whatever product they think is better than the other.
Its all based on what they value in a product... or maybe by the service given by the vendor in making sure they get what they asked for. People can just be plain biased about certain things. SO BE IT! Don't get mad... it is what it is!
If any of you have ever taken research...
you'd know that even the most elaborate studies produce reportable results that STILL ALLOW FOR ERROR! My point? This probably was meant to be a fun day to see "who wins". Now it has become all an opinion fest with not enough reliable data. The supposed official post of findings really doesn't seem so official either.
If you think that one test can determine an accurate measurement of who is the better tuner... or who can produce the best base map ECU... then DECIDE WHICH IT IS first that you are looking for.
THEN figure out under what rules, conditions, and guidelines the winner will be determined. But that's all it will be ... the winner of one contest... NOT gonna tell you much else.
All bent out of shape because you think you know more than the next guy....
No matter what you say or do... people have opinions... about whoever they think is better at what they do .....or whatever product they think is better than the other.
Its all based on what they value in a product... or maybe by the service given by the vendor in making sure they get what they asked for. People can just be plain biased about certain things. SO BE IT! Don't get mad... it is what it is!
If any of you have ever taken research...
you'd know that even the most elaborate studies produce reportable results that STILL ALLOW FOR ERROR! My point? This probably was meant to be a fun day to see "who wins". Now it has become all an opinion fest with not enough reliable data. The supposed official post of findings really doesn't seem so official either.
If you think that one test can determine an accurate measurement of who is the better tuner... or who can produce the best base map ECU... then DECIDE WHICH IT IS first that you are looking for.
THEN figure out under what rules, conditions, and guidelines the winner will be determined. But that's all it will be ... the winner of one contest... NOT gonna tell you much else.
Originally posted by jewpac42
I understand what you are saying. The thing is that, i think this is what I was told, when you get the ECUTek from i-speed, it comes with an hour of dyno tuning or 2 hours of street tuning. That is part of the package and should be considered when comparaing the product that you get from the vendor.
I understand what you are saying. The thing is that, i think this is what I was told, when you get the ECUTek from i-speed, it comes with an hour of dyno tuning or 2 hours of street tuning. That is part of the package and should be considered when comparaing the product that you get from the vendor.
To that end, IMO Vishnu and i-speed were both at a big disadvantage - Shiv is known to dislike tuning on non-Vishnu cars, and if I'm not mistaken, in a retail situation he wouldn not claim "no-ping, no-problem" for that particular test car with its particular mods. I-speed as stated before didn't get the 1-hour custom tune the offer with the package. Cobb is the only vendor who advertises Stage-1 as compatible with any non-dp exhaust system.
Originally posted by scoobygirl
You all sound like a bunch of ego-maniacs.
All bent out of shape because you think you know more than the next guy....
You all sound like a bunch of ego-maniacs.
All bent out of shape because you think you know more than the next guy....

Chill out, have a beer, relax!
Guest
Posts: n/a
Just a thought for everyone to think about. There are multiple tuners in the Bay Area, and everyone has thier reason for the tuner they pick. Wether it be reputation, reliabilty, customer service, experience, customer feedback or whatever. What makes this community better then any other one is the fact that there are multiple tuners in one area, what other place has that? You can go and talk to either one you want and really get to see which tuner you prefer. Each one has thier own methods of tuning and ways of communicating with thier customers. If you really want to know which one you prefer or which one it better for you just inquire with them about tuning or anything.
Beers and Cheers,
Bill @ I-Speed USA
Beers and Cheers,
Bill @ I-Speed USA
Friendly Neighborhood Ogre
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 19,930
From: www.gunatics.com
Car Info: GUNATICS.COM
Originally posted by skywalker
Just a thought for everyone to think about. There are multiple tuners in the Bay Area, and everyone has thier reason for the tuner they pick. Wether it be reputation, reliabilty, customer service, experience, customer feedback or whatever. What makes this community better then any other one is the fact that there are multiple tuners in one area, what other place has that? You can go and talk to either one you want and really get to see which tuner you prefer. Each one has thier own methods of tuning and ways of communicating with thier customers. If you really want to know which one you prefer or which one it better for you just inquire with them about tuning or anything.
Beers and Cheers,
Bill @ I-Speed USA
Just a thought for everyone to think about. There are multiple tuners in the Bay Area, and everyone has thier reason for the tuner they pick. Wether it be reputation, reliabilty, customer service, experience, customer feedback or whatever. What makes this community better then any other one is the fact that there are multiple tuners in one area, what other place has that? You can go and talk to either one you want and really get to see which tuner you prefer. Each one has thier own methods of tuning and ways of communicating with thier customers. If you really want to know which one you prefer or which one it better for you just inquire with them about tuning or anything.
Beers and Cheers,
Bill @ I-Speed USA
I couldn't agree more. Bravo sir.


