Originally Posted by brucelee

You're not really helping your case. We're not pushovers, we're just thinking it through on a more thorough level.


So let me help you out here.




Here's the scenario:


Woman yells, you hit her and break her nose. Cops come, see both sides, and lets say in the absolute BEST case scenario where you don't go to jail for some INSANE reason (which wouldn't happen), she still has a right to sue your *** for laying your hands on her. It's your word against hers unless you have it on video, and if you did have it on video you'd be stupid to admit that you do.




Overbear, do you believe the wife in the video had the right to break that woman's nose? Well, you obviously do otherwise you wouldn't be posting in this thread...


Any LEO's want to chime in about what would happen if the wife struck the prius owner, breaking her nose? Now lets use a scenario where a man hits the said prius owner and breaks her nose. If it was caught on tape like the original, would there be any dispute that the person hitting the prius owner is at fault?

Originally Posted by Overbear

Like I said "officer I was in fear of my life" in this state, if the DA doesnt charge you, they cant file a civil case (only in the case of self defence, we are protected just like other states that have a 'castle law' in place)

read up man, the whole thing hinges on her being the agressor, and you being in fear of yoru life/limb/property.