Man dies after BART officer shooting (was: I really hope this ain't true...)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 8, 2009 | 10:51 AM
  #196  
Rescuer's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,417
From: Earth
Car Info: .
I think this is a new, longer video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vQxBg5Jxp7c


HOLY CRAP, EVERYBODY WATCH THIS VID

Last edited by Rescuer; Jan 8, 2009 at 10:54 AM.
Old Jan 8, 2009 | 10:55 AM
  #197  
Rescuer's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,417
From: Earth
Car Info: .
so he wasn't restrained, they were in the process of restraining him. right after he's shot you can see his arms go out

but why use lethal force instead of your baton...

Last edited by Rescuer; Jan 8, 2009 at 10:57 AM.
Old Jan 8, 2009 | 11:14 AM
  #198  
R-Dub's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,585
From: Los Altos, CA
Car Info: The Latest From WayneTech.
I'm not sure if I would consider his shooting to be intentional.

The officer definitely looked surprised when his live weapon went off, I think he was expecting his TASER.

IMHO, this is the result of a poorly trained and prepared LEO who let his adrenaline take off his cool and didn't keep his head on straight.

Murder? No. Negligence? Absolutely.
Old Jan 8, 2009 | 11:22 AM
  #199  
Irish_car_B0mb's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 6,970
From: Upper North Bay
Car Info: '15 LE STI, '06 WRX White Wheeled Wagon, '06 B9
I think his weapon discharged. i dont think he shot the guy purposely.

And yes weapons do accidentally discharge. number one person to let you know this is Brucelee with his discharge, off the tire wall into the leg technique.though if the officer did you his baton it would have been rodney king accusations all over again.
Old Jan 8, 2009 | 11:33 AM
  #200  
R-Dub's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,585
From: Los Altos, CA
Car Info: The Latest From WayneTech.
Accidental discharge my ***.

He meant to fire that sidearm - but he was DEFINITELY not expecting live ammo.
Old Jan 8, 2009 | 11:39 AM
  #201  
joltdudeuc's Avatar
Old School
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 14,983
From: Union City
Car Info: '99 RBP GM6
Originally Posted by Roo
Please, go ask the owners of that hair braiding company, go ask the people whose cars were burned out, ask them if they can determine the difference between the peaceful protesters and the troublemakers.

I'm pretty certain that if I were in their shoes, I'd say that one caused the other, therefore would lump them all in the same group. If it hadn't been for the mass "protest", there wouldn't have been the "troublemakers".
In KTVU they were showing a smashed window while 3 protesters were standing there distraught saying they wanted something peaceful and that this is not what they wanted. 3 people all said this rioting is not what they wanted, not what they did. They marched from one place to the bart station, and that's it.

The actions of the rioters are rioters actions. To confuse the two or to group them together is not right.
Old Jan 8, 2009 | 11:39 AM
  #202  
Irish_car_B0mb's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 6,970
From: Upper North Bay
Car Info: '15 LE STI, '06 WRX White Wheeled Wagon, '06 B9
Originally Posted by R-Dub
Accidental discharge my ***.

He meant to fire that sidearm - but he was DEFINITELY not expecting live ammo.
Since when did officers start carrying blanks in their guns on new years eve?
Old Jan 8, 2009 | 11:42 AM
  #203  
R-Dub's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,585
From: Los Altos, CA
Car Info: The Latest From WayneTech.
Originally Posted by Irish_car_B0mb
Since when did officers start carrying blanks in their guns on new years eve?
I mean he was expecting his TASER, not live ammo from his service issue.
Old Jan 8, 2009 | 11:44 AM
  #204  
Irish_car_B0mb's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 6,970
From: Upper North Bay
Car Info: '15 LE STI, '06 WRX White Wheeled Wagon, '06 B9
Originally Posted by R-Dub
I mean he was expecting his TASER, not live ammo from his service issue.
BART officers dont carry tasers. or i am sure he would have used it instead of his firearm.

they have been back and forth on the taser thing for a while. i am sure after this they will get with the program.

i am sure that officers can tell the diff between a black fire arm and a bright neon yellow taser gun.
Old Jan 8, 2009 | 11:44 AM
  #205  
FW Motorsports's Avatar
iClub Silver Vendor
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,494
From: Participating in some Anarchy!
Car Info: 2005 LGT wagon
Weapons just don't "discharge" on their own!!
Fingers make weapons discharge!!


BTW...these fools got nothing on the homosexual community as far as how to effectively riot.
Old Jan 8, 2009 | 11:45 AM
  #206  
Lboogie's Avatar
banned
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,456
From: NorCal, SF East Bay
Car Info: 2007 WRX Limited | vf43'D
That protest just brought more shame to Oakland and make it's upright citizens look like village idiots.

Allowing a peaceful gathering with a message to get out of hand like that is the fault of the protest organizers and the police.

There's a right way & a wrong way to get the word out and exercise the 1st Amendment, last night was not indicative of the right way.
Old Jan 8, 2009 | 11:46 AM
  #207  
Irish_car_B0mb's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 6,970
From: Upper North Bay
Car Info: '15 LE STI, '06 WRX White Wheeled Wagon, '06 B9
Originally Posted by Paul@dbtuned

BTW...these fools got nothing on the homosexual community as far as how to effectively riot.
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Old Jan 8, 2009 | 11:46 AM
  #208  
R-Dub's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,585
From: Los Altos, CA
Car Info: The Latest From WayneTech.
Irish -

Originally Posted by Rescuer
The guy was cooperating, had his arms and legs restrained, unarmed, laying face down. I would really love to know why the officer felt the need to pull his gun on a restrained person face down.
squirming like a fish doesn't pose a threat that a baton or a knee to hold him still couldn't handle.

The best suggestion is that he was going for is taser, which is why some agencies use a cross draw. ALCO sheriff teaches cross drawing for the taser.
A sheriff buddy of mine posted this, which shows how similar the handles on the two guns are
"the current x-26 is shaped and feels like a gun because thats what TASER wants them to feel like"
Old Jan 8, 2009 | 11:49 AM
  #209  
Rescuer's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,417
From: Earth
Car Info: .
Originally Posted by Irish_car_B0mb
BART officers dont carry tasers. or i am sure he would have used it instead of his firearm.


http://www.contracostatimes.com/ci_11389946

Was BART cop reaching for Taser?
By Sean Maher
Oakland Tribune
Posted: 01/06/2009 08:20:43 PM PST
Updated: 01/07/2009 08:20:29 AM PST


OAKLAND — The BART police officer who shot and killed an unarmed man early New Year's Day in Oakland could have done it intentionally or by dire mistake, and a key factor is whether the officer was armed with a Taser that day, an attorney representing the dead man's family said Tuesday.

The officer, identified as Johannes Mehserle in a wrongful death claim, is seen on several recently released cell phone videos of the Fruitvale station incident standing over Oscar Grant III, at which point the officer appears to draw his gun from its holster on his right hip and point it at Grant, who is facedown on the station floor. Within moments a gunshot is heard and, in a video released Monday night, the officer looks up and down twice, then briefly touches his face with his hand.

Many online viewers of the video have posted comments speculating the officer may have thought he was reaching for a Taser when he grabbed his gun, suggesting he meant only to stun Grant, a 22-year-old Hayward man.

"In the case I'm involved in, it doesn't matter if he was reaching for a Taser or not," said civil rights attorney John Burris, who is representing Grant's family in a $25 million wrongful death claim filed Tuesday against BART and Mehserle. "At the end of the day, it's what he did that counts."

Burris has publicly asked Alameda County District Attorney Tom Orloff to consider filing criminal charges against Mehserle, however, and said the Taser question could have bearing on that issue.

"If he thought he was reaching for a Taser and pulled a gun, that's negligent. That would be involuntary manslaughter, a negligent homicide," Burris said. "If he didn't have any Taser on him ... that's an intentional killing: second-degree murder."


Burris and BART police Chief Gary Gee have said the facts remain unclear whether Mehserle had been carrying a Taser that day.

BART police began training to use Tasers about three months ago, BART spokesman Linton Johnson said.

The department does not have enough of the stun guns to equip every officer with one, Gee said. When officers do carry Tasers, he added, they are kept on a separate part of their belts from their service pistols.

"They keep those Tasers on the opposite side of their gun hand, or in the middle, pointed the opposite direction so you have to turn your hand to get it," Burris said. "No movement (on the videos) suggests (the officer) was reaching for anything other than the location where the gun was."

Burris said he has not requested any information from BART police but plans to submit a request in the next day or two.

Standard-issue pistols for BART police are Sig-Sauer .40-caliber semi-automatic pistols, Gee said, and the department uses the X26 model Taser.

A loaded Sig-Sauer weighs nearly three times as much as the X26 Taser and is taller by about 2 inches, according to specifications on a gun dealer and official Taser Web sites.

When five officers responded to reports of a fight on a BART train by stopping the train at the Fruitvale station about 2 a.m. Jan. 1, they ordered several passengers to get off that train and detained some of them, officials said. Grant was among those passengers, though officials have yet to confirm whether he was suspected of being involved in the fight.

BART officials have not confirmed the exact time of the shooting. The Oakland Fire Department responded to a call for medical help at 2:13 a.m., and Grant was still breathing at 2:22 a.m. when an American Medical Response ambulance arrived to take him to Highland Hospital, where he died.

BART police and the district attorney's office are continuing to investigate the shooting. Anyone with information is asked to call BART investigators at 877-679-7000, ext. 7040, or the district attorney's office at 510-272-6222.

Organizers have written on Facebook that a protest of the shooting is planned to begin at 3 p.m. today at the Fruitvale station, 3401 East 12th St.

Last edited by Rescuer; Jan 8, 2009 at 11:51 AM.
Old Jan 8, 2009 | 11:56 AM
  #210  
Rescuer's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,417
From: Earth
Car Info: .
Originally Posted by R-Dub
Irish -
the only thing to correct from my post is that the new video footage shows that the person was not restrained since his arms fell to his sides after he was shot.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:57 AM.