Looks like ford did something right!! Mustang content inside..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 12, 2010 | 04:33 PM
  #46  
Roo's Avatar
Roo
Forester Specialist
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,985
From: Sonoma County
Car Info: '98/'04 Foresters (S & XT)
Originally Posted by EQ Tuning
That would put us at 2.5l and 206hp. That's pretty good for a stock NA engine. Subaru's current 2.5l NA motor only puts out 170hp.

-- Ed
Too bad you can't tune the 2.5L DOHC N/A motor. Cobb can't tune it either, though...

I'd like to see what kind of HP gains could be had by a proper tune on that motor.
Old Jul 12, 2010 | 04:35 PM
  #47  
04caliwrx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,581
From: on the way to lake tahoe to shread! turbo beast
Car Info: 2016 WRX, 2014 lifter forester XT, 2005 JDM207 WGN
You can tune a NA 2.5, I think Ed has done one in the past...
Old Jul 12, 2010 | 04:40 PM
  #48  
EQ Tuning's Avatar
iClub Silver Vendor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,228
From: 631 Railroad Ave. Fairfield, CA
Car Info: A Laptop
Originally Posted by 04caliwrx
You can tune a NA 2.5, I think Ed has done one in the past...
Yep it depends on the year. Some are accessible, others are not. The gains are not all that big either way. You'd be looking at a 4-5hp gain with better drivability.

Thanks
-- Ed
Old Jul 12, 2010 | 04:43 PM
  #49  
04caliwrx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,581
From: on the way to lake tahoe to shread! turbo beast
Car Info: 2016 WRX, 2014 lifter forester XT, 2005 JDM207 WGN
Originally Posted by EQ Tuning
Yep it depends on the year. Some are accessible, others are not. The gains are not all that big either way. You'd be looking at a 4-5hp gain with better drivability.

Thanks
-- Ed
That's what I thought, I can recall that we have talked about this in the past that for the 2.5 na engines it's more about a smooth well rounded car then it is dyno numbers.

Speaking of the dyno, when will it be up and running?
Old Jul 12, 2010 | 05:43 PM
  #50  
1reguL8NSTi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 9,198
From: I gotta have more cow bell!!!!
Car Info: 05 STi
Originally Posted by 1JavaBlk_in_Sac
imagine 5.0 L STI .......610HP
Nope doesn't translate that way. If that was the case we'd just multiply liter bike motors X desired displacement.
Old Jul 12, 2010 | 07:07 PM
  #51  
EQ Tuning's Avatar
iClub Silver Vendor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,228
From: 631 Railroad Ave. Fairfield, CA
Car Info: A Laptop
Originally Posted by 04caliwrx

Speaking of the dyno, when will it be up and running?
hoping on this week

-- Ed
Old Jul 12, 2010 | 07:08 PM
  #52  
EQ Tuning's Avatar
iClub Silver Vendor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,228
From: 631 Railroad Ave. Fairfield, CA
Car Info: A Laptop
Originally Posted by 1reguL8NSTi
Nope doesn't translate that way. If that was the case we'd just multiply liter bike motors X desired displacement.
Sure it does... 5.0l with a couple turbos should have no problem making 600hp

-- Ed
Old Jul 12, 2010 | 08:28 PM
  #53  
kYLEMtnCRUZr's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,892
From: Hangin in Placerville youtube.com/rallydude1515
Car Info: 1999 RS Coupé- 1995 Mazda Miata -KTM 300
numbers shmumbers. NA4LYFE...or until a straight away comes
Old Jul 13, 2010 | 08:06 AM
  #54  
Roo's Avatar
Roo
Forester Specialist
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,985
From: Sonoma County
Car Info: '98/'04 Foresters (S & XT)
Originally Posted by EQ Tuning
Yep it depends on the year. Some are accessible, others are not. The gains are not all that big either way. You'd be looking at a 4-5hp gain with better drivability.

Thanks
-- Ed
'98 Forester falls under the category of NOT!!
Old Jul 13, 2010 | 04:32 PM
  #55  
jonp's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 277
From: Fremont
Car Info: '05 STI
A lot of peeps keep mentioning the 100 Wet Shot. Keep in mind, the Dyno numbers were without the NOS, but the track numbers were with it.

Different styles of cars for different reasons.
Old Jul 13, 2010 | 05:01 PM
  #56  
04caliwrx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,581
From: on the way to lake tahoe to shread! turbo beast
Car Info: 2016 WRX, 2014 lifter forester XT, 2005 JDM207 WGN
^ Regardless its great power for being na, When STS comes out with turbo kit it will have well over 550whp.
Old Jul 13, 2010 | 06:57 PM
  #57  
EQ Tuning's Avatar
iClub Silver Vendor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,228
From: 631 Railroad Ave. Fairfield, CA
Car Info: A Laptop
Originally Posted by jonp
A lot of peeps keep mentioning the 100 Wet Shot. Keep in mind, the Dyno numbers were without the NOS, but the track numbers were with it.

Different styles of cars for different reasons.
I think the second dyno run was with the 100 shot.


-- Ed
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JelloChex
Bay Area
2
Dec 7, 2009 03:11 PM
WRXWagon203
Cars For Sale
2
Feb 4, 2005 05:05 PM
Black Shadow
Car Lounge
53
Apr 28, 2004 12:28 AM
Zoeb2s
Bay Area
11
Feb 5, 2003 11:27 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:38 PM.


Top

© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands



When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.