Ford to release an AWD STI competitor?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 31, 2014 | 09:26 AM
  #46  
TurnWRX's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,641
From: CA
Honda knew many buyers of their Rsx-s and Civic Si will mod their cars, so their horsepower went largely unchanged. Look at them now. Nobody buys their "performance" cars anymore. I rarely even see any modified Hondas on the road anymore.

The STi is following this route and may get discontinued in the future. Why buy an STi when you can get a wrx for cheaper. Or you could even get an Audi S3 (base price $41k) for a tad higher than the STi, that performs similarly and doesn't look like a boy racer. Has less claimed HP and beats the STi in a straight line and on the track. Even if you don't agree with the results from the video below, it still can keep up with an STi, and has a much better interior.




Last edited by TurnWRX; Aug 31, 2014 at 09:31 AM.
Old Aug 31, 2014 | 09:48 AM
  #47  
Overbear's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,856
From: San Leandro, CA
Car Info: Forester XTi
Originally Posted by TurnWRX
...
and goes **** belly up with electrical problems, fuel injection problems, and oil leaks from every seal in the car, at 60k miles.
Old Aug 31, 2014 | 09:51 AM
  #48  
Overbear's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,856
From: San Leandro, CA
Car Info: Forester XTi
Originally Posted by damianwrb07
Mitsubishi how to build a performance motor
LOL you mean the motors that drop valves faster than a fat chick diving on a ice cream cake? You mean the motors that eat rings because of poor ring issues quicker than a red head on a bowl of *****?

Sure the EJ has its issues and needs a few tweaks, but its still a proven, and reliable engine. Lets compare shall we, how many EJ 207/25/255/257's are out there running 100k+ and how many other cars can compare (Hint: not many)
Old Aug 31, 2014 | 09:53 AM
  #49  
wombatsauce's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 7,441
From: Stockholm
Car Info: 2018 Golf R Variant
Originally Posted by Overbear
I am pretty sure I would win a bet, if I said I have wrenched on more fords than you have ever driven, or perhaps even had a ride in. **** cars are ****, from the f150 to the turd(aka mustang)
Hard to say, I am not really big on making authoritative statements based on zero knowledge, so I will just say: I doubt it.

And you are 100% correct, American Fords always have been absolute rubbish (though they are getting better today, mostly via introducing the Euro cars to the US). We are talking about European Fords, like the current/new Focus, which are completely different cars.

Take the 90's Ford Escort. In the US, all we ever saw was this FWD pile of absolute TRASH where you would be lucky to get ~10k miles out of it before the head cracked and made the head gasket useless.

In Europe, even the base model was a fun-to-drive RWD hatch that was not remotely similar - AT ALL - to the US model. You could even get a turbo. Then, they came out with the AWD turbo and even Cosworth models that were world-class rally cars. Most Americans have never even SEEN one.

Originally Posted by Overbear
*chuckles* you would be shocked how many cars I have owned over the years.

27 various air cooled Vdubs including a 64 notchback, 61 barn door walk thru dual side doors panel van bus, and a 51 split window.
64 Impala on 12" orllies, dual pumps, 4 way dumps, 7 batteries, done in candy brandy purple on gold Dayton wheels.
75 Fiat 128SL (I miss that car, very rare, very fun to toss around in the hills. I crashed it sad end, into a tree)
80 Corvette 1 of 50 sold with a stick shift, red on red exterior/interior, glass t tops. (after 1980, you could not get a stick again tell...89? might have been 88)
70 Nova SS (started life with a mild 350, sold it with a 454ci stroker with a GMC 6-71 blower on it and a dual wet nitrous setup.)

I grew up in a family of car enthusiasts and racers. My cousin raced IHRA sand drags, another cousin ran flat track sprint, and my uncle raced modified class p-51 mustangs (sports class pylon racing). I just kind of have always been around something with a motor all my life.

I don't think any one car is "better" than others, I do have my own personal preferences of course. I do feel that any US made (production) car after 75 is a steaming pile of **** (I MIGHT make an exception for the GT-40, the ZR1, and the CTS-V). I will also echo someone else in the thread and say, it is interesting to see where ford is taking things here in the US. However, they won't get far unless they start paying attention to details like the Asian and European manufactures do. Interior quality, fit and finish, ergonomics, and aesthetics.
You don't think one car is better than another? I mean, anyone that has lived through 1970-2000 American cars and has even a shred of interest in cars could not possibly say that. Chevy Cavalier/Caddy Cimmaron paved a new trail into the world of being a piece of ****. How about the Chevy Citation? Remember those? Seen one in the last twenty years? Neither have I because they have all basically rotted away.

My 1991 Justy is "better" than anything that GM or Ford produced in America from 1975 to 2002. Shoot, any run of the mill Datsun, Honda or Toyota is just plain and simply better from the quality of materials to the rust proofing to the way they were assembled. I remember pulling the door panel off an 80's Cadillac that was brand new and seeing it rusty inside already. Ten year old Japanese cars did not have this problem. GM cars had a plastic strip with holes in it to wind the windows up while Civics had a great set of metal gears.

Ford has realized what they needed to do insofar as interior quality, fit and finish, ergonomics, and aesthetics. They have addressed this, I think a few years ago, when they announced that Audi was the new target for these points. I personally feel they have done a great job - but the real problem is they took 20 years too long to do this, and have quite possibly alienated all the people that cared about this sort of thing - such as yourself. Take a look at one, I am not saying you will like it or that you should like it, but you cannot help but notice that the interior quality has significantly improved.
Old Aug 31, 2014 | 11:19 AM
  #50  
damianwrb07's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 649
From: turlock ca
Car Info: '14 Wrx Hatchback
Originally Posted by Overbear
LOL you mean the motors that drop valves faster than a fat chick diving on a ice cream cake? You mean the motors that eat rings because of poor ring issues quicker than a red head on a bowl of *****?

Sure the EJ has its issues and needs a few tweaks, but its still a proven, and reliable engine. Lets compare shall we, how many EJ 207/25/255/257's are out there running 100k+ and how many other cars can compare (Hint: not many)
A few tweaks? Replacing the Pistons and rods is not a few tweaks. The 2.5 is well known for being weak, even in its N/A days it blew head gaskets and now the cast pieces they use on the 'Hi Performance' motors can just badly handle stock power let alone an added 25-30 from Modifications. The newer 4g63 is a performance pillar compared to paper mâché EJ25s
Old Aug 31, 2014 | 11:49 AM
  #51  
DatAWSTi's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 336
From: Suisun
Car Info: 04 STi AW
Originally Posted by Scoobywax
Fords make better full size trucks than dodge but the 5.9 cummins is king. Ill likely own a ram 2500 or f250 bulletproofed 6.0. Leaning more towards the ram tho. More comfort.
Just so you know the 6.0 in the fords suck *** haha
Old Aug 31, 2014 | 05:19 PM
  #52  
Scoobywax's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 3,228
From: Santa Cruz, California
Car Info: 2006 obp wrx limited sedan
Originally Posted by DatAWSTi

Just so you know the 6.0 in the fords suck *** haha
How so? 03-05's had head gasket issues and egr issues but those are easily fixed. The 06 and 07 have minor issues as do all cars and trucks.
They have a badass transmission unlike the faithful 7.3 and they get better power and milage. Stay away from the 6.4 tho.
If you wanted a psd that you wanted to mod. Get a 03-05 and bulletproof it. California legal egr delete and arp headstuds. If you want coils instead of leafs and less problems then get the 06-07 psd. Still needs some work. 5.9 cummins is the king of all engines but would be better in a ford built truck.
Old Aug 31, 2014 | 06:35 PM
  #53  
DatAWSTi's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 336
From: Suisun
Car Info: 04 STi AW
Originally Posted by Scoobywax
How so? 03-05's had head gasket issues and egr issues but those are easily fixed. The 06 and 07 have minor issues as do all cars and trucks.
They have a badass transmission unlike the faithful 7.3 and they get better power and milage. Stay away from the 6.4 tho.
If you wanted a psd that you wanted to mod. Get a 03-05 and bulletproof it. California legal egr delete and arp headstuds. If you want coils instead of leafs and less problems then get the 06-07 psd. Still needs some work. 5.9 cummins is the king of all engines but would be better in a ford built truck.
The 6.0 has everything wrong with it. you can make it a good motor but thats with anything. It goes from egr issues to injectors to anything possible lol. I used to work for Ford and 90% of trucks that came in were 6.0. yes the 6.4 is garbage also the new 6.7 is nice though atleast so far. I'd take the cummins even if its in a dodge haha
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Nick Koan
Rally
1
Feb 27, 2006 10:57 AM
im4it
Rally
0
Nov 10, 2005 05:59 AM
im4it
Rally
0
Oct 31, 2005 09:46 AM
FaLeX
Car Lounge
0
Dec 11, 2002 11:16 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:04 PM.