Ford to release an AWD STI competitor?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 27, 2014 | 05:30 PM
  #16  
LxJLthr's Avatar
I survived the Mod Challenge and all I got was this lousy title
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,030
From: In Mother Russia...
Car Info: ...zeh car drives you!
Originally Posted by Overbear
No mater what you do, it's still a ford. Nothing in the universe can fix that problem other than fire, lots of fire.
Out of curiously...Have you actually driven, owned and/or raced any current Ford product?
Old Aug 27, 2014 | 05:42 PM
  #17  
Deniz1980's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 604
From: Solano County
Car Info: WRB 2012 WRX Sedan
Originally Posted by SkizzDawg
Didn't know ford made the VW Golf R400, Since the OP is talking about possibly Ford releasing an STi competitor. Wonder if they are doing this because of Block and people saying, why cant i get an AWD Focus and hoon like Block.
My bad Skizz just mentioning it cuz it is a competitor as well
Old Aug 27, 2014 | 05:48 PM
  #18  
oaklandish_WRX's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 951
From: 51-uhohh area code
Car Info: 0[[XXXXoXXXX]]0
Originally Posted by HyphySamurai
Theres gonna be a new mazda speed3 also. around 300-350hp awd
Yeah...if this comes true I'll No need for a Levorg!

Artist renderings...
Attached Thumbnails Ford to release an AWD STI competitor?-mazda3mps2016modelpic1.jpg  
Old Aug 27, 2014 | 05:52 PM
  #19  
Deniz1980's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 604
From: Solano County
Car Info: WRB 2012 WRX Sedan
I don't know if these guys can compete with Subaru AWD... I heard Top Gear did a review on the R400, and didn't do so well in handling dept
Old Aug 27, 2014 | 06:10 PM
  #20  
SkizzDawg's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,572
From: The Bay Area
Car Info: 2006 STI
Originally Posted by Deniz1980
My bad Skizz just mentioning it cuz it is a competitor as well
I was giving ya a hard time.

The top gear folks did bag on the VW handling as you mentioned in another post (forgot to quote it).
Old Aug 27, 2014 | 06:26 PM
  #21  
wombatsauce's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 7,441
From: Stockholm
Car Info: 2018 Golf R Variant
Originally Posted by LxJLthr
Out of curiously...Have you actually driven, owned and/or raced any current Ford product?
I find that when someone throws out a knowledge-free opinion putting down an entire brand or product line without any actual experience with such, it's best to just ignore it.

I have never really been a fan of Ford, but I will say the GT-40 and Ford GT were pretty nice. I have owned a '95 Mustang GT and an '84 Ranger that were mediocre at best, while bringing exactly the "car per dollar" value I expected out of a cheap V8 RWD car and an $800 pickup.

Whilst living in England, I was issued a Ford Mondeo "LX" model with the 1.4L 4 cylinder and I must say it was a right blast to drive. After a few weeks of not crashing that car, they upgraded me to a 2.0 Si (with Recaro seats and all). After 6 more months of not crashing that, I was handed the keys to a brand new turbo Impreza wagon (in 1999). In a country where folks actually know how to drive, hand-brake turns are part of the curriculum, my 13 mile commute (each way) was essentially a commuter deathmatch where I probably learned a large portion of what I think I know about driving. Keep in mind, it is LEGAL to pass here, against on-coming traffic, in certain areas. You break out to pass, and the people who you are charging against with a (let's say) 140mph speed differential, simply move over. I have seen folks trade mirrors at speed before - though rare, it's an impressive sight to see.

Anyone who disses a European Ford probably doesn't know anything about cars/driving and most assuredly cannot drive for crap. Anyone that puts down an entire brand should probably not be listened to. I mean, even Chrysler has made some interesting things. Even Chrysler!

That said, if this thing has 350whp, AWD, and can be had for $9k out the door - I MIGHT be interested.

Old Aug 27, 2014 | 06:30 PM
  #22  
kamnewton's Avatar
White Lightning
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 318
From: Ar-kansas
Car Info: Built, 6-Speed, E85, #pluskey 06 Wagon
Originally Posted by wombatsauce
I find that when someone throws out a knowledge-free opinion putting down an entire brand or product line without any actual experience with such, it's best to just ignore it.

I have never really been a fan of Ford, but I will say the GT-40 and Ford GT were pretty nice. I have owned a '95 Mustang GT and an '84 Ranger that were mediocre at best, while bringing exactly the "car per dollar" value I expected out of a cheap V8 RWD car and an $800 pickup.

Whilst living in England, I was issued a Ford Mondeo "LX" model with the 1.4L 4 cylinder and I must say it was a right blast to drive. After a few weeks of not crashing that car, they upgraded me to a 2.0 Si (with Recaro seats and all). After 6 more months of not crashing that, I was handed the keys to a brand new turbo Impreza wagon (in 1999). In a country where folks actually know how to drive, hand-brake turns are part of the curriculum, my 13 mile commute (each way) was essentially a commuter deathmatch where I probably learned a large portion of what I think I know about driving. Keep in mind, it is LEGAL to pass here, against on-coming traffic, in certain areas. You break out to pass, and the people who you are charging against with a (let's say) 140mph speed differential, simply move over. I have seen folks trade mirrors at speed before - though rare, it's an impressive sight to see.

Anyone who disses a European Ford probably doesn't know anything about cars/driving and most assuredly cannot drive for crap. Anyone that puts down an entire brand should probably not be listened to. I mean, even Chrysler has made some interesting things. Even Chrysler!

That said, if this thing has 350whp, AWD, and can be had for $9k out the door - I MIGHT be interested.

$9k

Last edited by kamnewton; Aug 27, 2014 at 06:32 PM.
Old Aug 27, 2014 | 06:34 PM
  #23  
wombatsauce's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 7,441
From: Stockholm
Car Info: 2018 Golf R Variant
Originally Posted by kamnewton
Tl;dr version?
No, sorry. You must know how to read in order to operate my posts. Probably best to just ignore them - they are not mandatory!

tl;dr: no.
Old Aug 27, 2014 | 07:07 PM
  #24  
Overbear's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,856
From: San Leandro, CA
Car Info: Forester XTi
Originally Posted by LxJLthr
Out of curiously...Have you actually driven, owned and/or raced any current Ford product?
Do I give a ****? Would never own a ford product, not ever. Oh I mean it must be a winner after the 6.0 diesel..oh wait, uh, the Lincoln blackwood...um, OH I know, the Mercury Park Lane...no wait. I got it, the pinto! no, hang on, lets see, The escort? the explorer? I know the mustang II, the SVO mustang?...
Old Aug 27, 2014 | 07:08 PM
  #25  
Overbear's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,856
From: San Leandro, CA
Car Info: Forester XTi
Originally Posted by 04GG
This lol. They aren't ALL bad, but not my first choice.
I might, let me stress that MIGHT consider the Raptor, if I won it for free or someone gave me one.
Old Aug 27, 2014 | 07:10 PM
  #26  
Overbear's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,856
From: San Leandro, CA
Car Info: Forester XTi
Originally Posted by wombatsauce
I find that when someone throws out a knowledge-free opinion putting down an entire brand or product line without any actual experience with such, it's best to just ignore it.
I am pretty sure I would win a bet, if I said I have wrenched on more fords than you have ever driven, or perhaps even had a ride in. **** cars are ****, from the f150 to the turd(aka mustang)
Old Aug 27, 2014 | 07:36 PM
  #27  
LxJLthr's Avatar
I survived the Mod Challenge and all I got was this lousy title
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,030
From: In Mother Russia...
Car Info: ...zeh car drives you!
Originally Posted by Overbear
Do I give a ****? Would never own a ford product, not ever. Oh I mean it must be a winner after the 6.0 diesel..oh wait, uh, the Lincoln blackwood...um, OH I know, the Mercury Park Lane...no wait. I got it, the pinto! no, hang on, lets see, The escort? the explorer? I know the mustang II, the SVO mustang?...
Because 60 year old US Mercury Park Lane has so much in common with current generation European Focus. Right. Makes perfect sense.
Old Aug 27, 2014 | 07:43 PM
  #28  
SkizzDawg's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,572
From: The Bay Area
Car Info: 2006 STI
Originally Posted by LxJLthr
Because 60 year old US Mercury Park Lane has so much in common with current generation European Focus. Right. Makes perfect sense.
All of his dated examples make perfect sense.
How about this. Ford sucks SOOOOO Much they didn't ask or take money from the bailout program, in fact they prospered on their own. I guess Fords really do suck and all of those consumers are just plain wrong. Dont forget all of their current safety recalls too...
Old Aug 27, 2014 | 08:54 PM
  #29  
Overbear's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,856
From: San Leandro, CA
Car Info: Forester XTi
Originally Posted by SkizzDawg
All of his dated examples make perfect sense.
How about this. Ford sucks SOOOOO Much they didn't ask or take money from the bailout program, in fact they prospered on their own. I guess Fords really do suck and all of those consumers are just plain wrong. Dont forget all of their current safety recalls too...
OH I am not making excuses for dodge or GM trust me. I won't own any GM made after 1974, and I won't own any dodge (other than jeep and ram) made after 1973.

My point is, its a ford, they are not known for their high build quality or great engineering. Not like the Japanese manufactures are, and to a lesser(much) extent the European ones.

I just see this as another in the current line of "hot hatches" from ford. Poor interiors, very poor seats, sloppy gear boxes. Can't fault the paint it seems pretty good but lets see in 10 years...now, all of that said, its still better than anything GM or Dodge offers right now.
Old Aug 27, 2014 | 09:21 PM
  #30  
Scoobywax's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 3,228
From: Santa Cruz, California
Car Info: 2006 obp wrx limited sedan
Originally Posted by Overbear

OH I am not making excuses for dodge or GM trust me. I won't own any GM made after 1974, and I won't own any dodge (other than jeep and ram) made after 1973.

My point is, its a ford, they are not known for their high build quality or great engineering. Not like the Japanese manufactures are, and to a lesser(much) extent the European ones.

I just see this as another in the current line of "hot hatches" from ford. Poor interiors, very poor seats, sloppy gear boxes. Can't fault the paint it seems pretty good but lets see in 10 years...now, all of that said, its still better than anything GM or Dodge offers right now.
Fords make better full size trucks than dodge but the 5.9 cummins is king. Ill likely own a ram 2500 or f250 bulletproofed 6.0. Leaning more towards the ram tho. More comfort.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:30 AM.