Equal or Unequal Length Headers
#16
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Discovery Bay, CA
Posts: 1,569
Car Info: Evo X GSR, F250 Powerstroke Diesel
Ditto! I think for the difference in spool (not noticeable) the Un-Equal headers are much more apealing. I drive EL's all day and they drone soo bad. I'd love to hear a boxer grumble when I cruise out of a light.
#18
I hate it when people use the word "around or roughly" when talking about dyno numbers, that really shows they have no idea what it is exactly.
#19
Hurray, it's Ian!!
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: on an airplane
Posts: 3,612
Car Info: 2002 MBP WRX Sedan
that's because
a)every pull is different.
b)i didn't go on a dyno run stock, then only with an aftermarket header. I did it from stock, then the listed mods after. so after a few pulls, it was AROUND 30ft/lb
happy?
a)every pull is different.
b)i didn't go on a dyno run stock, then only with an aftermarket header. I did it from stock, then the listed mods after. so after a few pulls, it was AROUND 30ft/lb
happy?
#20
VIP Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Santa Rosa
Posts: 5,588
Car Info: 2005 Unicorn
^^^that or it was like 29lbtq or 31 and they just wanna say 30 for an even number.
dumb ***. it means not a ****ing thing but what you want it to because of some pet peeve. (not meant at you ian but the poster before you)
maybe i missed it in the op, but i didn't see him mention year or displacement or see anyone ask, just people throwing out opinions, this is what kills me about iclub, give opinions first, ask for the details second. that MATTERS people. headers can kill the torque on a 2.0L if done wrong. everything i have heard from tuners is to stay away from equal length on the 2.0L and ive seen people lose torque on dyno sheets from them but gain bigger topend.
let's ask the details then give suggestions.. might make you more reputable.
dumb ***. it means not a ****ing thing but what you want it to because of some pet peeve. (not meant at you ian but the poster before you)
maybe i missed it in the op, but i didn't see him mention year or displacement or see anyone ask, just people throwing out opinions, this is what kills me about iclub, give opinions first, ask for the details second. that MATTERS people. headers can kill the torque on a 2.0L if done wrong. everything i have heard from tuners is to stay away from equal length on the 2.0L and ive seen people lose torque on dyno sheets from them but gain bigger topend.
let's ask the details then give suggestions.. might make you more reputable.
#21
so you went from stock to stage 2 basically and you think the 30tq was only from the header. come on man.
#22
Hurray, it's Ian!!
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: on an airplane
Posts: 3,612
Car Info: 2002 MBP WRX Sedan
i never said the 30ft/lb of torque was from the header. i even stated that the torque i gained was with all the mods combined and a reflash. i just stated what my numbers were when mike tuned my car at 3 years ago.
#26
Hurray, it's Ian!!
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: on an airplane
Posts: 3,612
Car Info: 2002 MBP WRX Sedan
not anymore. it was posted up once, and on one of my old harddrives of computers that crashed
https://www.i-club.com/forums/showth...highlight=tune
that's all i can dig up from back in the day about it
https://www.i-club.com/forums/showth...highlight=tune
that's all i can dig up from back in the day about it
#29
not anymore. it was posted up once, and on one of my old harddrives of computers that crashed
https://www.i-club.com/forums/showth...highlight=tune
that's all i can dig up from back in the day about it
https://www.i-club.com/forums/showth...highlight=tune
that's all i can dig up from back in the day about it