did you guys here about this?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 07:37 PM
  #31  
highspeed11's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 221
From: Bay Area, CA
Car Info: '05 LGT
They had the same law while I was living in NY. I still go by it after living back in CA for over a year. Though I didn't know it was now a law here too.
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 10:06 PM
  #32  
huck's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 10,197
From: San Ramon, Ca
Car Info: 2013 GR STi
I already turn my lights on if it's raining that hard. It's just common sense, driving in downpour is worse than driving at dusk.

Oh, and...
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 10:06 PM
  #33  
huck's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 10,197
From: San Ramon, Ca
Car Info: 2013 GR STi
"hear"
Old Jan 9, 2005 | 12:10 AM
  #34  
leftwo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 339
From: Oakland
Car Info: 05 STi
Originally Posted by burndtjamb
The text from that CHP pdf says:
"This amendment to the vehicle code requires every motor vehicle, other than a motorcycle, be operated with headlamps lighted when weather conditions require the windshield wipers to be in continuous use."

So if you're cleaning your windshield, your lights don't need to be on. Same if you Rain-X'ed your windshield and don't use the wipers.
Given what goal they are trying to achieve, I think this is the best wording.
It's not that "if you have your wipers on", it's "when conditions require" it.

Now, determining what "conditions require" wipers to be on may be something that
is difficult to define. I'm sure the judge will probably just take the officers word
that the conditions required it...
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
itsallgookx51
Bay Area
7
Apr 27, 2003 08:14 PM
1fastGC
Bay Area
2
Feb 20, 2003 10:01 PM
IS2Scooby
Hawaii
8
Nov 24, 2002 09:07 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:14 AM.