9/11 Super-Thermite found by Extensive Research

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 19, 2009 | 01:56 AM
  #46  
iLoqin's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,826
From: No Way
Car Info: Nadda
Originally Posted by smokey25
My .00 (worthless) cents..

I think we knew the attack was coming and didn't do anything to stop it, for an excuse for war.

As far as that other plane and the pentagon.. little shady to me, but I dunno, maybe those planes do disentegrate. People say they've never seen a crash with no wreckage, but how often DO you see a plane crash after it's run into something like the pentagon. Maybe that one was shot down by a missile, doubt there would be much left of that either. I've seen some nasty CAR, TRAIN and PLANE wreck footage where you look and are like... there was a car there? I'm sure the same could be said for some planes.

As far as covering a demolition of the Towers..... highly doubt it. Imagine it would take hundreds of people to plan and pull that off and everyone has been quiet? Again.. Bill Clinton couldn't even get served up by that heffer without the world finding out.
Have you seen a plane crash by even a small 10 person plane? It left more wreckage than that plane they supposedly brought down. Just watch some videos about demolition and how fast that high of a tower can drop. it dropped as fast as gravity. I think you really need to search up the physics of it. It's almost impossible for a building that tall to fast within 7 seconds. Just isnt' physically possible unless you blew out all the pillars (which the videos and people claim to have said they heard chinese firecrackers going off)
Old Apr 19, 2009 | 02:32 AM
  #47  
brucelee's Avatar
Friendly Neighborhood Ogre
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 19,930
From: www.gunatics.com
Car Info: GUNATICS.COM
A ten person plane and a 200 person plane are totally different... How fast was the airplane going when it slammed into the pentagon?

Also, I've seen interviews of people that were at the pentagon that said there was indeed wreckage of the plane in the pentagon.
Old Apr 19, 2009 | 10:49 AM
  #48  
smokey25's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 594
From: Cali 2 BC
Car Info: silverthorne 2000 2.5rs
Originally Posted by brucelee
A ten person plane and a 200 person plane are totally different... How fast was the airplane going when it slammed into the pentagon?

Also, I've seen interviews of people that were at the pentagon that said there was indeed wreckage of the plane in the pentagon.
Yeah, a 10 person plan flies what 100mph? don't commercial jets fly 400+ mph? Plus they are bigger with more mass, + probably made of the same materials as that 10 person plane. PHYSICS BROTHA!!!!

I agree the towers fell unlike anything before, but again, when was the last time two towers hundreds of stories tall got slammed into by huge commercial jets loaded with jet fuel? Who can say what was supposed to, or not supposed to happen to those towers. Sure the guy who engineered it said it could withstand the jets, but crazy **** happens. Bridges collapse due to high winds when they we're supposed to be engineered to withstand. The Titanic was UNSINKABLE!!! CONSPIRACY!

I just really can't believe we rigged *2* of the largest skyscrapers in the world with military grade explosives, and no one noticed, no one knows who did it. Just doesnt seem possible really.

I am as skeptical as the next guy.. but you gotta draw the line somwhere.

edit to add-

Really what is more plausible, that yes, after the jets hit, **** burned super hot, the top quarter of a skyscraper fell onto the rest of the skyscraper, and it all came crashing down. It IS insane, for sure, but we saw it happen.
OR
We rigged the towers with super-thermite explosives secretly while no one was watching, and brought them down with the precision of a demolition crew, yet, no one saw anyone setup this building to be demolished. I've SEEN TONS of building demolition shows, and it takes them a long time, they basically turn the building into a skeleton before doing it, wires, explosives, people, crews everywhere to take it down. And these are apartment buildings versus the busiest office towers in the world..... i dunno man, think about it.

Last edited by smokey25; Apr 19, 2009 at 10:54 AM.
Old Apr 19, 2009 | 10:58 AM
  #49  
smokey25's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 594
From: Cali 2 BC
Car Info: silverthorne 2000 2.5rs
Really, I'm kind of with you, I wish they WOULD prove the US had something to do with it, I hate Bush, he ****ed up not only America but the lives of millions across the world with his retarded policies. I do think we had a hand in it, somewhere, somehow, but I just can't believe the towers were brought down secretly by us.

And that's all I gotta say cause no one's gonna know, until we really know.
Old Apr 19, 2009 | 12:18 PM
  #50  
iLoqin's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,826
From: No Way
Car Info: Nadda
Well my logic tells me that the US is smart enough to have known if someone was planting pounds of thermite and bombs and wire it up all the way to the top (for the pillars) to blow up the twin towers, and fly planes into other areas. In addition, the guys who supposedly crashed theses planes (about 4-6 of them) were US military Air Force trained and protected. Protected by the United States? It just seems too weird that the United States Military made the mistake? I dont think so. Someone allowed them to get in there, get trained, to do a mission. Whether the military knew it or not, someone high up probably did. Everything points back to the government. The 9/11 official report in their book should be detailed and 100% correct. If they say stuff like "Well this amount of money transferred isn't significant enough to report, or this isn't significant to report" it's just lying. If they knew people would have questions about it, even if it isn't significant to report, at least report the facts of why it isn't important, not just say this isn't significant. If they tell us, they concluded that it was a pancake effect after so called "an extensive background search" and end up wrong (which they are, physics just doesn't make sense of what they said happened to what needed to happen to the building to be leveled like that) they are literally lying. They are telling is something physically isn't possible without blowing up all the pillars. Even MIT students couldn't figure out how to level the building without having to blow up all the pillars.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...ient=firefox-a

Just watch it, if you don't believe it that's up to you, but you should at least consider that the possibility exists, cuz to me it's plain blunt when someone says they hear explosion like firecrackers right before the towers fall, and watching the demolishing of the buildings blow outward and then falling inward.
Old Apr 19, 2009 | 12:43 PM
  #51  
iLoqin's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,826
From: No Way
Car Info: Nadda
The government has been proven to have lied and created false flag operations for their own causes. For example, one of the biggest ones was the Vietnam War. The Gulf of Tonkin Incident has been proven wrong by multiple credible sources, just search it up. The Gulf of Tonkin Incident was "Vietnamese ships firing torpedoes at a US Military Ship" it never happened, and it was proven that it never happened, yet the United States entered the Vietnam War.

There are a lot more false flag operations here.

http://911review.com/articles/anon/f...perations.html

Although the site isn't credible, the information they site are, especially the books that they list where the information was extracted from. I have no faith in our government, they're lying to us for a military hold over the whole world. Although I personally can't do anything about it, the country can if it rises up at the right time to get rid of our government.
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 12:07 AM
  #52  
youpers's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 322
From: Santa Cruz, CA
Car Info: LGT STI
Maybe you are working for the government. Maybe you propagate conspiracy theories to make them sound a little nutty and make us (the people) believe that the government is more powerful than it is, causing us to be afraid. Maybe the real conspiracy theory is the conspiracy theorists themselves, trying to cause a panache. Wrap your head around that one. Its spooky!
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 12:12 AM
  #53  
iLoqin's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,826
From: No Way
Car Info: Nadda
I think it's the right of the citizens to get the correct answers from our government that we made to protect us.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JamesGRrallye
Bay Area
23
Dec 2, 2004 09:50 PM
audiofreak
Car Lounge
4
Nov 23, 2003 03:38 PM
wackie
Forester General
20
Sep 7, 2003 02:14 PM
mattr762
Engine/Power - EJ20T (pre-2006 WRX and JDM)
4
Feb 12, 2003 10:05 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:10 PM.