9/11 Super-Thermite found by Extensive Research
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,826
From: No Way
Car Info: Nadda
It's pretty simple to say that thermite was used. Some of the pictures at the base of ground zero show the steel rods were severed CLEAN in a diagonal shape still red hot. Jet fuel couldn't have done that from 20 stories up. Look closely at the collapse of the tower (you'd actually see things blowing outward on windows a couple of floors below as the tower collapses. I don't think it was just compression that could do something like that, it followed a pattern all the way down the building.
The chief who made the twin towers built the thing ready for anything (including multiple planes into the building) and said that the building could probably withstand 5-6 plane impacts. The pancake effect (which the government uses for their excuse of how it collapsed) was shown as an impossible idea to have created the collapse of 9/11 (understand how physics work). If it somehow did pancake n' collapse one by one (it wouldn't have fallen at the free fall speed of gravity which it did. It would take time to land on another plateau and force it down. Anyone with a logical sense of physics knows it would be a lot longer to have hit the floor with a pancake effect.
There is a theory which i think is true and I'm not sure if anyone else has ever thought about it. No one was supposed to die. The plane impacts weren't supposed to shatter the fireproof surroundings of the stair wells, and everyone was supposed to get out. In an interview, someone made it out of the building a couple floors above impact and had enough time to run out. Evacuation could have made it for everyone inside the building from the top floor. However, the plan didn't work because the sudden jolt of the wrecks shattered the foam crap that's supposed to protect the stair wells from fires. The people who died above just got unlucky. It was supposed to be a clean collapse of the 2 towers without anyone inside, unfortunately they didn't prepare for the protective foam of the stairwells to shatter so easily. Ground Zero wasn't supposed to be ground zero, it was just supposed to be a statement collapsing the 2 towers with out any deaths (besides impact from the planes).
IMO Private investors hired Osama, told him to take the blame (and then obviously put him somewhere comfortable where no one is going to find him and probably luxurious, too.) and gave the United States an excuse to go into the Middle East, Rich Oil area. After all, to be a powerful nation, you need resources. USA was running low on oil and created a PERMANENT foothold in the middle east. There is no such huge threat as Al Queda, it's all a fake piece of propaganda. I mean look at us, a nation as large and wealthy fighting a measely puny TERRORIST group? That somehow planned to attack the biggest nation (which is miles and over seas away?!?) If I was a terrorist, I would be working in the areas around me, not thinking about blowing some other nation overseas.
The chief who made the twin towers built the thing ready for anything (including multiple planes into the building) and said that the building could probably withstand 5-6 plane impacts. The pancake effect (which the government uses for their excuse of how it collapsed) was shown as an impossible idea to have created the collapse of 9/11 (understand how physics work). If it somehow did pancake n' collapse one by one (it wouldn't have fallen at the free fall speed of gravity which it did. It would take time to land on another plateau and force it down. Anyone with a logical sense of physics knows it would be a lot longer to have hit the floor with a pancake effect.
There is a theory which i think is true and I'm not sure if anyone else has ever thought about it. No one was supposed to die. The plane impacts weren't supposed to shatter the fireproof surroundings of the stair wells, and everyone was supposed to get out. In an interview, someone made it out of the building a couple floors above impact and had enough time to run out. Evacuation could have made it for everyone inside the building from the top floor. However, the plan didn't work because the sudden jolt of the wrecks shattered the foam crap that's supposed to protect the stair wells from fires. The people who died above just got unlucky. It was supposed to be a clean collapse of the 2 towers without anyone inside, unfortunately they didn't prepare for the protective foam of the stairwells to shatter so easily. Ground Zero wasn't supposed to be ground zero, it was just supposed to be a statement collapsing the 2 towers with out any deaths (besides impact from the planes).
IMO Private investors hired Osama, told him to take the blame (and then obviously put him somewhere comfortable where no one is going to find him and probably luxurious, too.) and gave the United States an excuse to go into the Middle East, Rich Oil area. After all, to be a powerful nation, you need resources. USA was running low on oil and created a PERMANENT foothold in the middle east. There is no such huge threat as Al Queda, it's all a fake piece of propaganda. I mean look at us, a nation as large and wealthy fighting a measely puny TERRORIST group? That somehow planned to attack the biggest nation (which is miles and over seas away?!?) If I was a terrorist, I would be working in the areas around me, not thinking about blowing some other nation overseas.
Registered User
iTrader: (21)
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,038
From: CoCo....or tahoe!
Car Info: 07 specB
glad to see u filling the ignorant quota of this country...theres 100x more info supporting the simple fact that the "official reports" are garbage! some of the info may be less credible but there is far more supporting evidence leaning towards corruption than terrorism...if u honestly live in a state like ours and believe in our governement, u have either lost your mind or are simply what "they" are banking on 
u know, because passports have a higher heat tolerance than oh i dont know, black boxes and skyscrapers!
u know, because passports have a higher heat tolerance than oh i dont know, black boxes and skyscrapers!
It's pretty simple to say that thermite was used. Some of the pictures at the base of ground zero show the steel rods were severed CLEAN in a diagonal shape still red hot. Jet fuel couldn't have done that from 20 stories up. Look closely at the collapse of the tower (you'd actually see things blowing outward on windows a couple of floors below as the tower collapses. I don't think it was just compression that could do something like that, it followed a pattern all the way down the building.
The chief who made the twin towers built the thing ready for anything (including multiple planes into the building) and said that the building could probably withstand 5-6 plane impacts. The pancake effect (which the government uses for their excuse of how it collapsed) was shown as an impossible idea to have created the collapse of 9/11 (understand how physics work). If it somehow did pancake n' collapse one by one (it wouldn't have fallen at the free fall speed of gravity which it did. It would take time to land on another plateau and force it down. Anyone with a logical sense of physics knows it would be a lot longer to have hit the floor with a pancake effect.
There is a theory which i think is true and I'm not sure if anyone else has ever thought about it. No one was supposed to die. The plane impacts weren't supposed to shatter the fireproof surroundings of the stair wells, and everyone was supposed to get out. In an interview, someone made it out of the building a couple floors above impact and had enough time to run out. Evacuation could have made it for everyone inside the building from the top floor. However, the plan didn't work because the sudden jolt of the wrecks shattered the foam crap that's supposed to protect the stair wells from fires. The people who died above just got unlucky. It was supposed to be a clean collapse of the 2 towers without anyone inside, unfortunately they didn't prepare for the protective foam of the stairwells to shatter so easily. Ground Zero wasn't supposed to be ground zero, it was just supposed to be a statement collapsing the 2 towers with out any deaths (besides impact from the planes).
IMO Private investors hired Osama, told him to take the blame (and then obviously put him somewhere comfortable where no one is going to find him and probably luxurious, too.) and gave the United States an excuse to go into the Middle East, Rich Oil area. After all, to be a powerful nation, you need resources. USA was running low on oil and created a PERMANENT foothold in the middle east. There is no such huge threat as Al Queda, it's all a fake piece of propaganda. I mean look at us, a nation as large and wealthy fighting a measely puny TERRORIST group? That somehow planned to attack the biggest nation (which is miles and over seas away?!?) If I was a terrorist, I would be working in the areas around me, not thinking about blowing some other nation overseas.
The chief who made the twin towers built the thing ready for anything (including multiple planes into the building) and said that the building could probably withstand 5-6 plane impacts. The pancake effect (which the government uses for their excuse of how it collapsed) was shown as an impossible idea to have created the collapse of 9/11 (understand how physics work). If it somehow did pancake n' collapse one by one (it wouldn't have fallen at the free fall speed of gravity which it did. It would take time to land on another plateau and force it down. Anyone with a logical sense of physics knows it would be a lot longer to have hit the floor with a pancake effect.
There is a theory which i think is true and I'm not sure if anyone else has ever thought about it. No one was supposed to die. The plane impacts weren't supposed to shatter the fireproof surroundings of the stair wells, and everyone was supposed to get out. In an interview, someone made it out of the building a couple floors above impact and had enough time to run out. Evacuation could have made it for everyone inside the building from the top floor. However, the plan didn't work because the sudden jolt of the wrecks shattered the foam crap that's supposed to protect the stair wells from fires. The people who died above just got unlucky. It was supposed to be a clean collapse of the 2 towers without anyone inside, unfortunately they didn't prepare for the protective foam of the stairwells to shatter so easily. Ground Zero wasn't supposed to be ground zero, it was just supposed to be a statement collapsing the 2 towers with out any deaths (besides impact from the planes).
IMO Private investors hired Osama, told him to take the blame (and then obviously put him somewhere comfortable where no one is going to find him and probably luxurious, too.) and gave the United States an excuse to go into the Middle East, Rich Oil area. After all, to be a powerful nation, you need resources. USA was running low on oil and created a PERMANENT foothold in the middle east. There is no such huge threat as Al Queda, it's all a fake piece of propaganda. I mean look at us, a nation as large and wealthy fighting a measely puny TERRORIST group? That somehow planned to attack the biggest nation (which is miles and over seas away?!?) If I was a terrorist, I would be working in the areas around me, not thinking about blowing some other nation overseas.
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,826
From: No Way
Car Info: Nadda
The ties just seem too significant to just say Osama is a terrorist. If anyone is a terrorist, it's us doing this to ourselves to make up some excuse that this Al Qaeda must be stopped. That's like saying we can figure out who is a viet cong and who wasn't in Vietnam.
Sure, it might seem far fetched. I just found it strange how the Bin Laden family have had long time ties with the United States (even living in Virginia right next to the pentagon) and how George Bush Sr. was having lunch with Osama's Older Brother during 9/11.
The ties just seem too significant to just say Osama is a terrorist. If anyone is a terrorist, it's us doing this to ourselves to make up some excuse that this Al Qaeda must be stopped. That's like saying we can figure out who is a viet cong and who wasn't in Vietnam.
The ties just seem too significant to just say Osama is a terrorist. If anyone is a terrorist, it's us doing this to ourselves to make up some excuse that this Al Qaeda must be stopped. That's like saying we can figure out who is a viet cong and who wasn't in Vietnam.
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,004
From: Northern Bay Area: Larkspur
Car Info: 02 Silver WRX sedan. Eibach springs, Blitz NUR cat back, Rota 17" Attacks, Cobb AccessPort/DP
lol...so silly
So if I was the big bad government and I wanted to get away with the crime of the century, why then would I leave behind so much evidence that would lead back to me?
It's so rediculous that anyone that buys into this crap should really feel stupid.
It's so rediculous that anyone that buys into this crap should really feel stupid.
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,826
From: No Way
Car Info: Nadda
You sir are one of the sheep. Go ahead n' believe the government, I'm sure they've NEVER been wrong, but what you are believing isn't reality, just a cover up. Did you ever see the site where the socalled plane was brought down by the passengers on board? There was absolutely no metal, any physics person would tell you that was just a hole dug by some machine and trash dumped into it. There was no evidence at all that a plane ever hit that spot.
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 751
From: South San Jose
Car Info: 2007 WRX CGM
I'm not saying I believe it was an inside job.. but I do believe the gov can fabricate a story to cover something up. Just saying.. anythings possible and dismissing facts from reliable studies because the government is on our side is just pure ignorance.
btw, the FBI thought the Oklahoma city bombing was a terrorist attack on the US. Turned out it was domestic and they were completely wrong.
Last edited by jondl; Apr 17, 2009 at 12:10 PM.
Registered User
iTrader: (21)
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,038
From: CoCo....or tahoe!
Car Info: 07 specB
Have you even read or watched videos of the explanation of the collapse? I mean you want to take the word that it was seriously a pancake effect? Are you STUPID? Just that alone and the knowledge of physics just doesn't make any sense. THIS IS COMING FROM THE ALL MIGHTY GOVERNMENT. They released the report of 9/11 as the OFFICIAL way of what happened, and it just isn't possible with the way physics works.
You sir are one of the sheep. Go ahead n' believe the government, I'm sure they've NEVER been wrong, but what you are believing isn't reality, just a cover up. Did you ever see the site where the socalled plane was brought down by the passengers on board? There was absolutely no metal, any physics person would tell you that was just a hole dug by some machine and trash dumped into it. There was no evidence at all that a plane ever hit that spot.
You sir are one of the sheep. Go ahead n' believe the government, I'm sure they've NEVER been wrong, but what you are believing isn't reality, just a cover up. Did you ever see the site where the socalled plane was brought down by the passengers on board? There was absolutely no metal, any physics person would tell you that was just a hole dug by some machine and trash dumped into it. There was no evidence at all that a plane ever hit that spot.