2014 Wrx engine failure

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-13-2014, 09:06 PM
  #61  
Friendly Neighborhood Ogre
iTrader: (6)
 
brucelee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: www.gunatics.com
Posts: 19,930
Car Info: GUNATICS.COM
I'm also jumping off the Subaru ship.

My 2007 STi motor blew at 40k, turbo went out at 80k. Car has been bone stock for 40k miles now. I do regular maintenance and use the best possible oils, etc.
brucelee is offline  
Old 03-13-2014, 09:59 PM
  #62  
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
 
91vtec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: San Jose
Posts: 1,357
Car Info: 2011 Sti SWP
Just curious for those whos engines blew

What symptoms were seen and how did you confirm bad engine
91vtec is offline  
Old 03-13-2014, 10:18 PM
  #63  
Registered User
 
Overbear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Leandro, CA
Posts: 3,856
Car Info: Forester XTi
Originally Posted by damianwrb07
So Subaru not addressing known engine component faults are ok? I should have done some research on how weak the internals are on these "Performance" cars. A direct competitor uses Forged internals not cast and I realize why they are more expensive.
You should have left it alone and kept it stock. Subaru does not sell cars with the intent of being modded, that is a 3rd party function.

You mod, its on you, all of us that mod are in the same boat. If my brand new 08+ oem block goes bad, its going to be on me because I have modded and tuned. I have done things with it, the engineers, you know the guys who DESIGNED the motor, never intended.

So, if you wanted to mod the motor, you should have done the research yes, known what you were getting into, what the outcome could be, and that you were doing something the car was never built to do. You want to point fingers at SOA, at others, when you should be pointing it at yourself.
Overbear is offline  
Old 03-14-2014, 05:20 AM
  #64  
Technical Know-It-All
 
Brfatal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sterling, VA
Posts: 2,123
Car Info: '02 WRX + '15 WRX
Originally Posted by 91vtec
Just curious for those whos engines blew

What symptoms were seen and how did you confirm bad engine
Which one?
Brfatal is offline  
Old 03-14-2014, 07:20 AM
  #65  
iClub Silver Vendor
iTrader: (12)
 
EQ Tuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: 631 Railroad Ave. Fairfield, CA
Posts: 8,228
Car Info: A Laptop
Originally Posted by Overbear
You should have left it alone and kept it stock. Subaru does not sell cars with the intent of being modded, that is a 3rd party function.

You mod, its on you, all of us that mod are in the same boat. If my brand new 08+ oem block goes bad, its going to be on me because I have modded and tuned. I have done things with it, the engineers, you know the guys who DESIGNED the motor, never intended.

So, if you wanted to mod the motor, you should have done the research yes, known what you were getting into, what the outcome could be, and that you were doing something the car was never built to do. You want to point fingers at SOA, at others, when you should be pointing it at yourself.
Forget modding. Go take a bone stock STI on a track a handful of times and see how long it survives. Modding has very little to do with the failures. It's generally aggressive driving that takes them out. The problem is the Subaru is selling people performance cars and expects them to be driven like Camry's.

-- Ed
EQ Tuning is offline  
Old 03-14-2014, 07:46 AM
  #66  
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Deniz1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Solano County
Posts: 604
Car Info: WRB 2012 WRX Sedan
SOA bag the Harmon Kardon or whatever upgraded sound system you have, the moon roof, and that funky batman wing..... And give us a performance built motor or we are all getting GTR's
Deniz1980 is offline  
Old 03-14-2014, 07:48 AM
  #67  
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
damianwrb07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: turlock ca
Posts: 649
Car Info: '14 Wrx Hatchback
Originally Posted by Overbear
You should have left it alone and kept it stock. Subaru does not sell cars with the intent of being modded, that is a 3rd party function.

You mod, its on you, all of us that mod are in the same boat. If my brand new 08+ oem block goes bad, its going to be on me because I have modded and tuned. I have done things with it, the engineers, you know the guys who DESIGNED the motor, never intended.

So, if you wanted to mod the motor, you should have done the research yes, known what you were getting into, what the outcome could be, and that you were doing something the car was never built to do. You want to point fingers at SOA, at others, when you should be pointing it at yourself.
Your completely missing the point. The wrx/Sti is marketed as a "performance car" and the internal engine parts are cheap and fail on even on stock motors, these cars were supposedly designed to be driven hard (not every time you get in them)but we didn't buy a Kia for a reason

Last edited by damianwrb07; 03-14-2014 at 07:51 AM.
damianwrb07 is offline  
Old 03-14-2014, 07:51 AM
  #68  
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
CBSubie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: California
Posts: 353
Car Info: 2005 STi
I'm on my last Subaru. My first STi went out due to a bad oil pick up tube (have you guys ever seen the factory welds on a new oem oil p/u tube?). My second motor went out last year.. Im really considering an Accord haha..
CBSubie is offline  
Old 03-14-2014, 07:51 AM
  #69  
Registered User
 
Overbear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Leandro, CA
Posts: 3,856
Car Info: Forester XTi
Originally Posted by EQ Tuning
Forget modding. Go take a bone stock STI on a track a handful of times and see how long it survives. Modding has very little to do with the failures. It's generally aggressive driving that takes them out. The problem is the Subaru is selling people performance cars and expects them to be driven like Camry's.

-- Ed
They don't market the WRX or the STI as a "track car" its a "sports car".


My point is here people is simple... caveat emptor
Overbear is offline  
Old 03-14-2014, 08:21 AM
  #70  
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
 
Scoobywax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Santa Cruz, California
Posts: 3,228
Car Info: 2006 obp wrx limited sedan
Originally Posted by Deniz1980
SOA bag the Harmon Kardon or whatever upgraded sound system you have, the moon roof, and that funky batman wing..... And give us a performance built motor or we are all getting GTR's
I upgraded my own sound system, love the moon roof and ditched my bat wing for a limited fin.

Yall should have bought old subies or a new evo.

The 2014 Evolution MR is my next sports car.
Scoobywax is offline  
Old 03-14-2014, 08:30 AM
  #71  
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Shayhan27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Livermore
Posts: 2,127
Car Info: LUMPY CGM 05 WRX
If only I knew back in 2008 when I bought my WRX now, I would have bought and EVO 8 MR.

Cams, injectors, fuel pump, turbo = less money and more powa.......
Shayhan27 is offline  
Old 03-14-2014, 09:00 AM
  #72  
Roo
Forester Specialist
iTrader: (3)
 
Roo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Sonoma County
Posts: 3,985
Car Info: '98/'04 Foresters (S & XT)
Originally Posted by damianwrb07
Your completely missing the point. The wrx/Sti is marketed as a "performance car" and the internal engine parts are cheap and fail on even on stock motors, these cars were supposedly designed to be driven hard (not every time you get in them)but we didn't buy a Kia for a reason
Perhaps you should ask Subaru to produce a new STi that has 700+ WHP, run on regular gas, get at least 50MPG, not require maintenance, and stick with the same price tag.

Fast, Cheap, Reliable - choose two.
Roo is offline  
Old 03-14-2014, 09:00 AM
  #73  
Registered User
 
UKn00b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Hayward
Posts: 325
Car Info: 1996 Impreza L
Oddly enough Subaru would like to do away with all forced induction models as soon as they can especially SOA, the reason given is they account for less than -10% of SOA gross sales yet yield over 78% of all warranty claims
UKn00b is offline  
Old 03-14-2014, 09:05 AM
  #74  
Registered User
 
UKn00b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Hayward
Posts: 325
Car Info: 1996 Impreza L
It's also plausible that Subaru knows the weakness in their current EJ257 engines given that since it's release in MY04 the stated crank output has increased roughly 2% (300 to 305) I'm fairly certain just about every other manufacturer that has a car still in it's line up even NA models boasts far more increase on their engines over a 10 year span!
UKn00b is offline  
Old 03-14-2014, 09:35 AM
  #75  
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
G_Ride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Campbell, CA
Posts: 7,634
Car Info: Some sort of Subaru
Originally Posted by Overbear
They don't market the WRX or the STI as a "track car" its a "sports car".


My point is here people is simple... caveat emptor
That's a good point. The WRX/STI isn't a race car. Things break faster at the track.

Originally Posted by Shayhan27
If only I knew back in 2008 when I bought my WRX now, I would have bought and EVO 8 MR.

Cams, injectors, fuel pump, turbo = less money and more powa.......
You don't want the MR. The 5 speed is more reliable and can handle more abuse compared to the 6 speed in the Evo 8/9 MR.

Originally Posted by Roo
Perhaps you should ask Subaru to produce a new STi that has 700+ WHP, run on regular gas, get at least 50MPG, not require maintenance, and stick with the same price tag.

Fast, Cheap, Reliable - choose two.
Very true
G_Ride is offline  


Quick Reply: 2014 Wrx engine failure



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:06 AM.


Top

© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands



When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.