Nice!
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 330
From: At the Ritz Carlton, in the pool bar.
Car Info: 2005 Legacy GT "lightweight"
Nice!
Good thing here it's free to advertise! (Till the site grows and they start charging someone!)
But I could be wrong!
Alex, didn't you support the idea of charging vendors way back then?
But I could be wrong!
Alex, didn't you support the idea of charging vendors way back then?
Admin v2.0
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,965
From: Alameda, CA, USA
Car Info: 02 Black Legacy GT
I supported the general idea of charging vendors.
But see, if you don't charge them. You doing them a "favour".
If you charge them, they are doing you a "favour".
If you make them unhappy, they will not pay and leave. Which means that you have their interests at high priority levels, instead of your own vision or members. Thats conflict of interest.
The way I wanted to do it and maybe will do it here, will benefit all and not interfer with anyone's interests.
Plus, vendors are diff. Compare Kartboy with Irvine Subaru. They has to be a diff approach to each of them.
You'll see how I go about it.
After all, I don't see anyone complaining when you go to the mall.
Vendors are happy, people are happy and mall management is happy.
- Alex
But see, if you don't charge them. You doing them a "favour".
If you charge them, they are doing you a "favour".
If you make them unhappy, they will not pay and leave. Which means that you have their interests at high priority levels, instead of your own vision or members. Thats conflict of interest.
The way I wanted to do it and maybe will do it here, will benefit all and not interfer with anyone's interests.
Plus, vendors are diff. Compare Kartboy with Irvine Subaru. They has to be a diff approach to each of them.
You'll see how I go about it.
After all, I don't see anyone complaining when you go to the mall.
Vendors are happy, people are happy and mall management is happy. - Alex
Originally posted by Imprezer
I supported the general idea of charging vendors.
But see, if you don't charge them. You doing them a "favour".
If you charge them, they are doing you a "favour".
If you make them unhappy, they will not pay and leave. Which means that you have their interests at high priority levels, instead of your own vision or members. Thats conflict of interest.
The way I wanted to do it and maybe will do it here, will benefit all and not interfer with anyone's interests.
Plus, vendors are diff. Compare Kartboy with Irvine Subaru. They has to be a diff approach to each of them.
You'll see how I go about it.
After all, I don't see anyone complaining when you go to the mall. Vendors are happy, people are happy and mall management is happy.
- Alex
I supported the general idea of charging vendors.
But see, if you don't charge them. You doing them a "favour".
If you charge them, they are doing you a "favour".
If you make them unhappy, they will not pay and leave. Which means that you have their interests at high priority levels, instead of your own vision or members. Thats conflict of interest.
The way I wanted to do it and maybe will do it here, will benefit all and not interfer with anyone's interests.
Plus, vendors are diff. Compare Kartboy with Irvine Subaru. They has to be a diff approach to each of them.
You'll see how I go about it.
After all, I don't see anyone complaining when you go to the mall.
Vendors are happy, people are happy and mall management is happy. - Alex
Word.
I can't wait to see where we are in a month!
nearly 1,000 members now, let say that 60% are posting all the time.
that's good turn out in 2 days.
-Gagan
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 330
From: At the Ritz Carlton, in the pool bar.
Car Info: 2005 Legacy GT "lightweight"
Originally posted by Imprezer
I supported the general idea of charging vendors.
But see, if you don't charge them. You doing them a "favour".
If you charge them, they are doing you a "favour".
If you make them unhappy, they will not pay and leave. Which means that you have their interests at high priority levels, instead of your own vision or members. Thats conflict of interest.
The way I wanted to do it and maybe will do it here, will benefit all and not interfer with anyone's interests.
Plus, vendors are diff. Compare Kartboy with Irvine Subaru. They has to be a diff approach to each of them.
You'll see how I go about it.
After all, I don't see anyone complaining when you go to the mall. Vendors are happy, people are happy and mall management is happy.
- Alex
I supported the general idea of charging vendors.
But see, if you don't charge them. You doing them a "favour".
If you charge them, they are doing you a "favour".
If you make them unhappy, they will not pay and leave. Which means that you have their interests at high priority levels, instead of your own vision or members. Thats conflict of interest.
The way I wanted to do it and maybe will do it here, will benefit all and not interfer with anyone's interests.
Plus, vendors are diff. Compare Kartboy with Irvine Subaru. They has to be a diff approach to each of them.
You'll see how I go about it.
After all, I don't see anyone complaining when you go to the mall.
Vendors are happy, people are happy and mall management is happy. - Alex
See, if you would've pulled your weight over there, it would've given you a strong hand and precense, but since you didn't do jack, the **** pot got full!
Ahh, f uck it! I don't care! I know that moderation like on the other board will take effect and once you **** them off, again, they are free to go as they didn't pay anything thus having nothing to hold them here.
Just my .2 cents
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post