Teh Politics Forum Rumors and lies and Teh Iraqi Info Minister and much much more...

This is why Bush will win.

Old Sep 14, 2004 | 11:37 AM
  #16  
Salty's Avatar
Thread Starter
VIP Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,675
From: Wherever Sucks the Most
Car Info: 2003 WRX, 2008 Camry
Originally Posted by njc200
Actually, it was 1993. February 26, 1993.

Clinton was inaugurated January 20, 1993. A little over a month in office and he gets blamed for not stopping the bombing all the time by the media and right-wingers.
Thanks for the clarification, njc200.

It has nothing to do with putting the blame on Clinton's shoulders. I'm making the point that there wasn't any "W" "gung-ho" attitude remotely present when Osama planned the WTC attacks in 1993.

Muslim faith, foreign policy and Redneck "Get'er done" attitude aside, we were (and still are today) dealing with radical individuals that exploited their religious faith to make it seem okay to exterminate our way of life.
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 12:34 PM
  #17  
esracer's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,663
From: Corpus Christi, Texas
Car Info: 2002 Honda S2000
Originally Posted by SilverScoober02
Remind me again when Iraq struck us first?
Iraq struck Kuwait first which brought the whole thing with America against Iraq, it has been know through polls and such that people are glad that Sadam is gone and, the man committed several crimes and deserves to be routed out. So we liberated a nation, now there is still fighting going on, but atleast the man is out, and people are happier.

Originally Posted by Salty
Muslim faith, foreign policy and Redneck "Get'er done" attitude aside, we were (and still are today) dealing with radical individuals that exploited their religious faith to make it seem okay to exterminate our way of life.
I totally agree this we are dealing with radical people and other countries that are hating the U.S. for the wrong reasons. Maybe some people should step back and look at America and model after it, no we are not the perfect country, but atleast our freedom and our rights make us have the least problems compared to other countries, The world just needs to shape up and unite instead of all this childs play bickering, ooooo my religion says I can kill sh*t, or I don't like you so I kill you and hate your country sh*t wake up world we are all different so lets get along, too bad it doesn't work that way, so war has to happen sometimes to make the world a better place. sorry for all the babbling but that's what I think.
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 12:36 PM
  #18  
SilverScoober02's Avatar
VIP Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,064
From: Detroit, Where the weak are killed and eaten...
Car Info: 02 Impreza WRX Sedan & 2008 GMC Sierra 4x4
Originally Posted by Salty
Muslim faith, foreign policy and Redneck "Get'er done" attitude aside, we were (and still are today) dealing with radical individuals that exploited their religious faith to make it seem okay to exterminate our way of life.
True, but why do you think they feel like that? It has everything to do with our Foreign policy. Which is not a partisan issue at all because it sucks coming from all ends, but Bush has really drug it into the mud.

Our blind support of Israel and our direct neglect of the Palestinians people is an example of why alot of the muslim world distrusts us.
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 12:42 PM
  #19  
FW Motorsports's Avatar
iClub Silver Vendor
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,494
From: Participating in some Anarchy!
Car Info: 2005 LGT wagon
Originally Posted by SilverScoober02
...our direct neglect of the Palestinians people is an example of why alot of the muslim world distrusts us.
Horse ****!!

Neighboring Islamic counties WILL NOT accept any Palestinian as refugees.
Why?
Because these Muslim nations do not want a peaceful solution...they want Isreal gone.
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 12:55 PM
  #20  
BlingBlingBlue's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,402
From: Bay Area
Car Info: 02 WRX wagon=dead; rollin' in a Craptastic Camry!
Originally Posted by Salty
Thanks for the clarification, njc200.

It has nothing to do with putting the blame on Clinton's shoulders. I'm making the point that there wasn't any "W" "gung-ho" attitude remotely present when Osama planned the WTC attacks in 1993.
Bush Sr. had been in office for the previous four years, and Reagan had been in office 8 years prior to that. I believe that their foreign policy had much to do with fostering militant Islamic extremism. These groups take years to plan an attack. Remember how the Bush Sr. administration told Iraq that we would not meddle in it's affairs a few days before Iraq went into Kuwait? We told them we didn't care then declared war on them in a matter of days. That is only one example of US foreign policy which recruits terrorists.
You are free to disagree, but if you do, there is really no point in trying to have a rational discussion.


Originally Posted by Salty
Muslim faith, foreign policy and Redneck "Get'er done" attitude aside, we were (and still are today) dealing with radical individuals that exploited their religious faith to make it seem okay to exterminate our way of life.
We are dealing with radicals, but we need to take some responsibility for fostering the hatred. Bush is popular because he spreads fear, and people want to believe that the USA is completely without fault. People not taking responsibility for their own actions is a chronic problem in this country, so it's really not too surprising.
...what's that old saying, "pride comes before a fall".
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 01:11 PM
  #21  
psoper's Avatar
250,000-mile Club President
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,770
From: Bizerkeley
Car Info: MBP 02 WRX wagon
Originally Posted by Oaf
Neighboring Islamic counties WILL NOT accept any Palestinian as refugees.
I'm pretty sure that isn't true, Syria and Lebanon have taken in as many as they can over the years, the problem is they can't take them all.

Originally Posted by Oaf
Why?
Might it be because they think the Palestinians might deserve to stay on land that they've lived on for generations?

Originally Posted by Oaf
Because these Muslim nations do not want a peaceful solution...they want Isreal gone.
I'm sure that is probably true of some PEOPLE within these neighboring muslim nations, but to say it is true of all of these nations is a really bigotted racist thing to say, there is probably a significant majority in all of those countries that would prefer a peaceful solution, but policies aren't dictated by the majority there anymore than they are around here.

Policies get dictated by those in power, and those in power in Israel seem to act as though they think they have a monopoly on truth and justice when in fact their policies show utter contempt for both.

And the US siding with them only makes us more hated in that part of the world.
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 02:05 PM
  #22  
Salty's Avatar
Thread Starter
VIP Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,675
From: Wherever Sucks the Most
Car Info: 2003 WRX, 2008 Camry
Originally Posted by BlingBlingBlue
Bush Sr. had been in office for the previous four years, and Reagan had been in office 8 years prior to that. I believe that their foreign policy had much to do with fostering militant Islamic extremism. These groups take years to plan an attack. Remember how the Bush Sr. administration told Iraq that we would not meddle in it's affairs a few days before Iraq went into Kuwait? We told them we didn't care then declared war on them in a matter of days. That is only one example of US foreign policy which recruits terrorists.
You are free to disagree, but if you do, there is really no point in trying to have a rational discussion.

This is only partially true and I'm willing to admit that. Esracer stumbled over the other major reason as to why they hate us with the following...


Originally Posted by esracer
Maybe some people should step back and look at America and model after it, no we are not the perfect country, but atleast our freedom and our rights make us have the least problems compared to other countries.
You just hit the nail on the head regarding why terrorist organizations (mainly Muslim radical groups) are threatened by our country. Even though Bush's actions in Kuwait may have been the straw that broke the camel's back regarding American infidels in an Arab country, it's the fact there's other religions that challenge the very existence and power of Allah. It’s the fact that everyone can practice their non-Muslim faiths under the 1st amendment without scrutiny. This very fact makes their blood boil and disrupts the very fabric and ideals they hold sacred. Why do you think they hate Jewish-Israel so much?

Originally Posted by Oaf
Horse ****!!

Neighboring Islamic counties WILL NOT accept any Palestinian as refugees.
Why?
Because these Muslim nations do not want a peaceful solution...they want Isreal gone.
Amen to that!

Every radical Muslim group and country always has!

Last edited by Salty; Sep 14, 2004 at 02:11 PM.
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 02:07 PM
  #23  
psoper's Avatar
250,000-mile Club President
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,770
From: Bizerkeley
Car Info: MBP 02 WRX wagon
Wow that is really amazing that you know how the "Muslim mind" operates, you must be some kind of mind reader, what awesome powers you have Salty!
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 02:13 PM
  #24  
Salty's Avatar
Thread Starter
VIP Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,675
From: Wherever Sucks the Most
Car Info: 2003 WRX, 2008 Camry
Originally Posted by psoper
Wow that is really amazing that you know how the "Muslim mind" operates, you must be some kind of mind reader, what awesome powers you have Salty!
I have no idea how the "Muslim mind" operates smart ***. On the other hand, you don't have to be a rocket scientist to understand the mind of -any- radical Muslim (or radical follower of any religious faith for that matter).
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 02:46 PM
  #25  
SilverScoober02's Avatar
VIP Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,064
From: Detroit, Where the weak are killed and eaten...
Car Info: 02 Impreza WRX Sedan & 2008 GMC Sierra 4x4
Originally Posted by esracer
Iraq struck Kuwait first which brought the whole thing with America against Iraq
That is funny. Step out of the timewarp dude we already went to war with Iraq about that. We liberated the Kuwati people and all was well.

Yes Saddam was a very bad man and in the long run things will be better for the Iraqi people. BUT, We went into this war for one thing (WMD's) and now that there aren't any they change it to "well he was bad so it is good that he is gone now." You bought their BS hook, line and sinker.

Originally Posted by esracer
it has been know through polls and such that people are glad that Sadam is gone and, the man committed several crimes and deserves to be routed out. So we liberated a nation, now there is still fighting going on, but atleast the man is out, and people are happier.
Ya they are so glad. Thats why they are fighting as insurgents against our forces. What are you blind? There have now been more american deaths than since the "End of major combat operations"
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 02:50 PM
  #26  
SilverScoober02's Avatar
VIP Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,064
From: Detroit, Where the weak are killed and eaten...
Car Info: 02 Impreza WRX Sedan & 2008 GMC Sierra 4x4
Originally Posted by psoper
I'm pretty sure that isn't true, Syria and Lebanon have taken in as many as they can over the years, the problem is they can't take them all.



Might it be because they think the Palestinians might deserve to stay on land that they've lived on for generations?



I'm sure that is probably true of some PEOPLE within these neighboring muslim nations, but to say it is true of all of these nations is a really bigotted racist thing to say, there is probably a significant majority in all of those countries that would prefer a peaceful solution, but policies aren't dictated by the majority there anymore than they are around here.

Policies get dictated by those in power, and those in power in Israel seem to act as though they think they have a monopoly on truth and justice when in fact their policies show utter contempt for both.

And the US siding with them only makes us more hated in that part of the world.
Thanks for arguing that one for me psoper while I was workin.....
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 03:05 PM
  #27  
Salty's Avatar
Thread Starter
VIP Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,675
From: Wherever Sucks the Most
Car Info: 2003 WRX, 2008 Camry
Originally Posted by SilverScoober02
Ya they are so glad. Thats why they are fighting as insurgents against our forces.
The only people that are fighting as insurgents are from the same cities once loyal to Saddam (ie Fallujah) that had something to loose with him out of power. Go figure, they're the very same cities that the media continues to report about in order to convince people like yourself of the majority view in Iraq

Of course the majority of non-insurgents aren't too happy with the American's ongoing occupation of Iraq but I guarantee you they're thankful Saddam's out of power.

Originally Posted by SilverScoober02
What are you blind? There have now been more american deaths than since the "End of major combat operations"
Here we go...

Care to share your vast military statistics with the rest of us?
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 03:23 PM
  #28  
SilverScoober02's Avatar
VIP Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,064
From: Detroit, Where the weak are killed and eaten...
Car Info: 02 Impreza WRX Sedan & 2008 GMC Sierra 4x4
Originally Posted by Salty
Here we go...

Care to share your vast military statistics with the rest of us?
You wanted it. End of Major Combat Operations as stated by your President George W. Bush = May 1, 2003 (He did this aboard the USS Abraham if you remember)

And these are taken from this Military Casualty website.

http://web1.whs.osd.mil/mmid/casualty/castop.htm

Before April 30, 2003
Hostile 109
Non-Hostile 29
Total 138

After May 1, 2003
Hostile 623
Non-Hostile 218
Total 841

Now try to comprehend what the "End of Major Combat Operations" means to you. I know you are ex-military so it shouldn't be hard. Damn Salty I thought you would have known this already since you are indeed Military. It has been over the amount during the "major" stuff for some time now. It is just a shame that we are losing all these good men and women for something that was "justified" by BS and Bad Intelligence.
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 03:34 PM
  #29  
Salty's Avatar
Thread Starter
VIP Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,675
From: Wherever Sucks the Most
Car Info: 2003 WRX, 2008 Camry
Nevermind... I didn't grasp what you were refering to regarding the "End of major combat operations" quote.

I thought you were going to start posting Vietnam and WWII statistics in comparision to OIF like they actually compared.

Disregard & carry on
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 04:02 PM
  #30  
SilverScoober02's Avatar
VIP Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,064
From: Detroit, Where the weak are killed and eaten...
Car Info: 02 Impreza WRX Sedan & 2008 GMC Sierra 4x4
Originally Posted by Salty
Nevermind... I didn't grasp what you were refering to regarding the "End of major combat operations" quote.

I thought you were going to start posting Vietnam and WWII statistics in comparision to OIF like they actually compared.

Disregard & carry on
LOL I thought you would know what I was talking about when I clarified....

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:32 PM.