Thoughts on .xxx?
Originally Posted by HellaDumb
Why not? They should also put **** like this in there: http://www.moveon.org/
just rem this hella, karma is a mother****er...
VIP Member
iTrader: (14)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,675
From: Wherever Sucks the Most
Car Info: 2003 WRX, 2008 Camry
Originally Posted by dr3d1zzl3
yes nothing like censorship!
I don't even have kids yet and can already tell how I’d react in this case. It would be censorship if they eliminated it altogether. All it is a restriction just like that catalytic converter on your car. You still drive, don't you? The factories making the converters reap the benefits just as the domain sellers will. Big deal.
If it means consolidating **** so those that want to find it know exactly to look and those wanting to block it know exactly not to look, then I say that's awesome.
<-- doesnt have any cats on his car
and it is censorship if you are FORCING them onto a domain, if you open it up and let them do wtf they want then no big deal, but if you are forcing them to use a xxx domain as a part of their buisness (and thus marketing, and even political statements, what if i wanted to show parady cartoon **** of the pres?? gonna force me to a .xxx name? ding ding ding).
anyways i think it would be bull**** to mandate all **** go to .xxx, and i think it is even more retarded that these inbred non technology knowing mother****ers on the right are *****ing and moaning about **** on the web, if it wasnt for **** the net wouldnt be half of what it is... (how do you think the service providers make money now a days, it aint on the 2 dollar a month hosting or the 10 dollars a meg in a datacenter to all the small sites.. ITS THE ****!!!
hell secure credit transaction were pushed along by porno sites (ssl anyone?) ssl wouldnt have seen the adoption curve it did with out he porno industry backing it, as well as a **** TON of other security technologies (think content filter, think application firewalls, think all sorts of goodness)
Its an inside joke for most hardcore techies that **** is what fuels the internet (well not a joke, its the damn truth)
and it is censorship if you are FORCING them onto a domain, if you open it up and let them do wtf they want then no big deal, but if you are forcing them to use a xxx domain as a part of their buisness (and thus marketing, and even political statements, what if i wanted to show parady cartoon **** of the pres?? gonna force me to a .xxx name? ding ding ding).
anyways i think it would be bull**** to mandate all **** go to .xxx, and i think it is even more retarded that these inbred non technology knowing mother****ers on the right are *****ing and moaning about **** on the web, if it wasnt for **** the net wouldnt be half of what it is... (how do you think the service providers make money now a days, it aint on the 2 dollar a month hosting or the 10 dollars a meg in a datacenter to all the small sites.. ITS THE ****!!!
hell secure credit transaction were pushed along by porno sites (ssl anyone?) ssl wouldnt have seen the adoption curve it did with out he porno industry backing it, as well as a **** TON of other security technologies (think content filter, think application firewalls, think all sorts of goodness)
Its an inside joke for most hardcore techies that **** is what fuels the internet (well not a joke, its the damn truth)
VIP Member
iTrader: (14)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,675
From: Wherever Sucks the Most
Car Info: 2003 WRX, 2008 Camry
Originally Posted by dr3d1zzl3
anyways i think it would be bull**** to mandate all **** go to .xxx, and i think it is even more retarded that these inbred non technology knowing mother****ers on the right are *****ing and moaning about **** on the web, if it wasnt for **** the net wouldnt be half of what it is...
You're right... I would probably get a lot more traffic and would certainly have a higher alexa rank (not that alexa matters). Whatever...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post