Powell and Three Others to Leave Cabinet.
Originally Posted by psoper
OK just one more point-
a good lawyer will tell you, "no- that's pretty f-ed up you shouldn't do that" when his client tells him he plans to do something illegal.
A kiss-*** syncophant lawyer will write up a position statement based on utter nonsense in an attempt to defend a clients wrongful action.
I still think we'd be better off with a good lawyer as Attorney General.
a good lawyer will tell you, "no- that's pretty f-ed up you shouldn't do that" when his client tells him he plans to do something illegal.
A kiss-*** syncophant lawyer will write up a position statement based on utter nonsense in an attempt to defend a clients wrongful action.
I still think we'd be better off with a good lawyer as Attorney General.
An internet-geocities-conspiracy nut lawyer looks at cnn releases on Iraq, and then gives you a bogus "legal" opinion of the situation.
Thread Starter
VIP Member
iTrader: (14)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,675
From: Wherever Sucks the Most
Car Info: 2003 WRX, 2008 Camry
Originally Posted by psoper
I might as well be arguing with a 2 by 4.
you guys believe all is well in your little army-man world, we'll just kill all the terrists and live happily ever after.
fine, have it your way.
you guys believe all is well in your little army-man world, we'll just kill all the terrists and live happily ever after.
fine, have it your way.
It's not based on the fact we can or cannot disprove your argument. It's the fact that most of your arguments are unconventional and don't take the path of least resistance if you catch my drift.
It's one thing to disprove someone's argument with facts which happens on occasion in Teh Politics forum. It's another thing to present a somewhat believable argument to the discussion and I believe you’ve failed to do this on numerous occasions. I like to think of your reasoning in the same respect as being dealt a royal flush... sure it's possible but how many times have you seen it happen?
Last edited by Salty; Nov 15, 2004 at 05:41 PM.
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,256
From: Blue-faced in a red state
Car Info: 04 Silver WRX Wagon
Originally Posted by Salty
It's another thing to present a somewhat believable argument to the discussion and I believe you’ve failed to do this on numerous occasions.
Second, psoper's point is valid. You try to discredit him because it is an unlikely occurence, but that is a fallacious form of reasoning.
And Guru, you are obviously a smart man. However, wading through your pompousness makes my feet hurt
Thread Starter
VIP Member
iTrader: (14)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,675
From: Wherever Sucks the Most
Car Info: 2003 WRX, 2008 Camry
Originally Posted by dub2w
First off, I have no idea what this means. (But trying to figure it out is a fun mental challenge!)
Originally Posted by dub2w
You try to discredit him because it is an unlikely occurence
Thread Starter
VIP Member
iTrader: (14)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,675
From: Wherever Sucks the Most
Car Info: 2003 WRX, 2008 Camry
Originally Posted by Salty
Do you at least have a decent rebuttal for my last post regarding Lt. Col. West?
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,256
From: Blue-faced in a red state
Car Info: 04 Silver WRX Wagon
"To present a somewhat believable argument to the discussion".... ???
what is that? I didnt explain anything cause I dont know what you are trying to say. I guess I might be able to break this down more effectively if I say it out loud in a Don King voice
:says it out loud as Don King but is still confused:
what is that? I didnt explain anything cause I dont know what you are trying to say. I guess I might be able to break this down more effectively if I say it out loud in a Don King voice
:says it out loud as Don King but is still confused:
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Unregistered
Teh Politics Forum
25
Nov 2, 2004 03:23 PM



