+3.

 

I'll answer your question even though you didn't answer mine about what your point is with the search thing.

Right, context plays the biggest roll in determining whether or not a statement, image, video, etc. is too racey/offensive for a particular forum, no doubt. What I said was, all things being equal, those two words are not. i stand by that statement. It's not a big difference, but there is one.

Again, the Admin on this forum (and most other car forums I've been on) has chosen to limit free speach when it's overly offensive. I haven't read the rules so I don't know how they worded it, but it doesn't matter really. They have decided to moderate free speach when it goes overboard. It's not an easy task to define the fine line so judgement calls will be required.

I'm just saying to cry like a little ***** when you get your wrist slapped while breaking the rules is juvenile. So what if somebody else got away with a supposedly similar offense? You're not innocent or a victim so quit acting like it.

 

thats a logical fallacy. if all things are equal, then by definition those words are the same. maybe you should go to the Palestinian territories and call someone a Jew, i guarantee the result will be worse than using the N word in Oakland.

what rule was broken? it wasnt a filtered word

 

It's a figure of speech that most people realize is referring to the context surrounding a topic. Are you just pretending to be this dense?

As I said, I haven't read the rules, but I'm sure they allow for judgement calls when somebody uses hate speech.

 

...

 

i needed a second and a third

look lets all still be freinds still after this like it was before

we dont all agree thats teh point of this forum
nothing in here will kill you its not life a death