New Nominee for Supreme Court
10-31-2005, 12:09 PM
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: UCIrvine
Posts: 3,312
Car Info: '05 Crystal Grey Metallic WRX Sport Wagon
New Nominee for Supreme Court
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051031/...co/bush_scotus
The question is...was Mielers a mistake or a planned tactic by the Bush admin...
The question is...was Mielers a mistake or a planned tactic by the Bush admin...
10-31-2005, 12:35 PM
#3
iClub Silver Vendor
iTrader: (25)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Participating in some Anarchy!
Posts: 15,494
Car Info: 2005 LGT wagon
Originally Posted by MVWRX
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051031/...co/bush_scotus
The question is...was Mielers a mistake or a planned tactic by the Bush admin...
The question is...was Mielers a mistake or a planned tactic by the Bush admin...
10-31-2005, 12:37 PM
#4
VIP Member
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Wherever Sucks the Most
Posts: 8,675
Car Info: 2003 WRX, 2008 Camry
Praised by Democrats when confirmed for a Philiadelphia-based appeals court 15 years ago, Alito has staked out positions supporting restrictions on abortion, such as parental and spousal notification.
10-31-2005, 12:40 PM
#5
VIP Member
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Wherever Sucks the Most
Posts: 8,675
Car Info: 2003 WRX, 2008 Camry
Originally Posted by Oaf
You give Bush waaaay too much credit.
Haha yeah. That's what i'm thinking. I don't think Mier was anything more than a poor choice on Bush's part. I still don't know why he nominated her as opposed to doing what he's doing now from the start.
I'm curious as to why you think it's a tactic, MVWRX.
Last edited by Salty; 10-31-2005 at 12:42 PM.
10-31-2005, 12:44 PM
#6
Originally Posted by Salty
Being regretfully pro choice, I don't see anything wrong with ^that^.
10-31-2005, 12:56 PM
#7
iClub Silver Vendor
iTrader: (25)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Participating in some Anarchy!
Posts: 15,494
Car Info: 2005 LGT wagon
Originally Posted by jvick125
Why regretfully? I'm proud to be pro choice. I believe in a [b]women's[\b] right to chose.
My wife can kill our unborn child without every getting my opinion on the matter.
10-31-2005, 01:38 PM
#8
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: UCIrvine
Posts: 3,312
Car Info: '05 Crystal Grey Metallic WRX Sport Wagon
Originally Posted by Salty
I'm curious as to why you think it's a tactic, MVWRX.
That part was a joke. Sorry if it missed the mark. I just noticed noone had posted about the new nominee yet and found a little humor in the whole situation...but the thread is back on discussing the nominee, which is where I knew it would end up when I posted it...
11-02-2005, 11:07 AM
#9
You'd think if she was a strategic appointment he would've picked someone the dems would never go for. If I'm correct conservatives were the ones in opposition to her nomination.
11-02-2005, 11:16 AM
#10
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: UCIrvine
Posts: 3,312
Car Info: '05 Crystal Grey Metallic WRX Sport Wagon
Actually, the way I thought of it was this...he picks someone all the dems like and the republicans don't, get them (conservatives) all riled up and interested in the nomination, and then appease all of his constituants and punch the pacified dems in the face with a Scalia like nominee. Like I said before, I don't think it was actually a tactic but I do think it helped the new nominee to have Mielers fail.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
khizzle
NorCal Classifieds
16
06-27-2008 12:41 PM
SilverScoober02
Teh Politics Forum
49
10-28-2005 10:32 AM