King Barry violates Constitution?
Either you're blind, or refuse to accept what's been going on. Either way it's a waste of time.
14.7 Million and rising unemployed (Buffet predicts +11% by the end of the year)
-1/3 of our national security while agreeing to end shield development
National Health Care reform + highest debt in nations history
Stimulus 1 + 2=more unemployed and more tax payer burden
Transparent Administration, C'mon man!!!
Cap and Trade
North Korea
Iran
Obama is a naive phony. Before your very eyes a socialist revolution is underway. The United States as we knew it; The United States which was intended, is no more. Obama's not the only one to blame. This is the change the idiots want, so be it. Just let it be known there's no comin' back.
14.7 Million and rising unemployed (Buffet predicts +11% by the end of the year)
-1/3 of our national security while agreeing to end shield development
National Health Care reform + highest debt in nations history
Stimulus 1 + 2=more unemployed and more tax payer burden
Transparent Administration, C'mon man!!!
Cap and Trade
North Korea
Iran
Obama is a naive phony. Before your very eyes a socialist revolution is underway. The United States as we knew it; The United States which was intended, is no more. Obama's not the only one to blame. This is the change the idiots want, so be it. Just let it be known there's no comin' back.
OH ****!! Guess I better go stick my head back in the sand. Seriously though - the "you agree or you're stupid" thing is a little hard to swallow. Maybe I am just blind, or maybe I know exactly what's going on and I refuse to accept it. Pretty easy explanation to throw out, and it beats the heck out of the need to accept any other lurking possibility.
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,808
From: San Jose, CA
Car Info: 2015 WRX
No, it does not stand to reason that more unemployed people means more new unemployment claims. What they are counting is NEW unemployment claims, not TOTAL unemployment claims.
So, let's say there were 100 new unemployment claims last month.
This month there are 80 new unemployment claims.
The reports say that "there are fewer new unemployment claims" even though the total number of unemployed people has increased. There are now 180 unemployed people.
So the number of new unemployment claims are going down...
But the total number if unemployed are still going up.
So, let's say there were 100 new unemployment claims last month.
This month there are 80 new unemployment claims.
The reports say that "there are fewer new unemployment claims" even though the total number of unemployed people has increased. There are now 180 unemployed people.
So the number of new unemployment claims are going down...
But the total number if unemployed are still going up.
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,808
From: San Jose, CA
Car Info: 2015 WRX
Watch this and it shows that the picture of Obama supposedly looking at that girl's *** is the same thing.
http://www.nypost.com/seven/07102009...ief_178552.htm
I guess Barry's off the hook but Sarkozy... Get that man a tissue.
See video at bottom of page.
I guess Barry's off the hook but Sarkozy... Get that man a tissue.
See video at bottom of page.
https://www.i-club.com/forums/showpo...3&postcount=35
You said:
Really? And rising?
Yes, "and rising". The number of unemployed people are still going up, aren't they? To quote yourself: "That is, of course, a rhetorical question, because that's exactly how it works."
There is no reason to call the discussion "ridiculous and meaningless". I think the distinction between "unemployment" and "new unemployment claims" is an important distinction to be made.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ipozestu
To touch on thew 14.7 million and rising that are unemployed, here another gem that's being pushed through.
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/...5qHxQD99AHR5G0
Coincidence? 2010,2012 election, healthcare reform, immigration reform. I think not.
Originally Posted by ipozestu
To touch on thew 14.7 million and rising that are unemployed, here another gem that's being pushed through.
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/...5qHxQD99AHR5G0
Coincidence? 2010,2012 election, healthcare reform, immigration reform. I think not.
Quote:
NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- The number of Americans filing initial unemployment claims fell sharply last week, while those filing ongoing claims rose to another all-time high, according to government data released Thursday.
There were 565,000 initial jobless claims filed in the week ended July 4, down 52,000 from a revised 617,000 the previous week, the Labor Department said.
It was the lowest number since January and was below the consensus estimate of 603,000 from economists surveyed by Briefing.com.
NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- The number of Americans filing initial unemployment claims fell sharply last week, while those filing ongoing claims rose to another all-time high, according to government data released Thursday.
There were 565,000 initial jobless claims filed in the week ended July 4, down 52,000 from a revised 617,000 the previous week, the Labor Department said.
It was the lowest number since January and was below the consensus estimate of 603,000 from economists surveyed by Briefing.com.
There is no reason to call the discussion "ridiculous and meaningless". I think the distinction between "unemployment" and "new unemployment claims" is an important distinction to be made.
Remember the picture of McCain in the debate with his tongue sticking out? And the video that showed that it was taken completely out of context?
Watch this and it shows that the picture of Obama supposedly looking at that girl's *** is the same thing.
Watch this and it shows that the picture of Obama supposedly looking at that girl's *** is the same thing.
You said:
Yes, "and rising". The number of unemployed people are still going up, aren't they? To quote yourself: "That is, of course, a rhetorical question, because that's exactly how it works."
There is no reason to call the discussion "ridiculous and meaningless". I think the distinction between "unemployment" and "new unemployment claims" is an important distinction to be made.
Yes, "and rising". The number of unemployed people are still going up, aren't they? To quote yourself: "That is, of course, a rhetorical question, because that's exactly how it works."
There is no reason to call the discussion "ridiculous and meaningless". I think the distinction between "unemployment" and "new unemployment claims" is an important distinction to be made.