The Iran-Iraq connection
12-01-2006, 01:51 PM
#1
VIP Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Wherever Sucks the Most
Posts: 8,675
Car Info: 2003 WRX, 2008 Camry
The Iran-Iraq connection
http://abcnews.go.com/International/...C-RSSFeeds0312
We all know it exists and has existed. A buddy of mine was killed by Iranian made weapon when the war in Iraq was young. Tony Blair has publicly stated that Iran is shipping weapons and we do nothing. So much for Bush Doctrine, eh? "If you support a terrorist you are a terrorist. What a bunch of malarkey. We've been dealing with Iran and NK heavily for sometime now.
Doctrine should be we might get to you eventually once our forces aren't thin and you're an enemy we think we can beat easily. In the meantime feel free to supply the Shia with containers hidden among the thousands of trucks that cross the Iraq border, gear up with nukes, and openly support Hizbollah.
If we continue down this path we'll only have two options I can think of right now:
1) For every Iranian made weapon we find we drop one bomb on Iran. (Won't happen)
2) Let Iran deal with the entire mess because we're already allowing them to do so much behind our backs.
We all know it exists and has existed. A buddy of mine was killed by Iranian made weapon when the war in Iraq was young. Tony Blair has publicly stated that Iran is shipping weapons and we do nothing. So much for Bush Doctrine, eh? "If you support a terrorist you are a terrorist. What a bunch of malarkey. We've been dealing with Iran and NK heavily for sometime now.
Doctrine should be we might get to you eventually once our forces aren't thin and you're an enemy we think we can beat easily. In the meantime feel free to supply the Shia with containers hidden among the thousands of trucks that cross the Iraq border, gear up with nukes, and openly support Hizbollah.
If we continue down this path we'll only have two options I can think of right now:
1) For every Iranian made weapon we find we drop one bomb on Iran. (Won't happen)
2) Let Iran deal with the entire mess because we're already allowing them to do so much behind our backs.
12-01-2006, 02:33 PM
#2
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: UCIrvine
Posts: 3,312
Car Info: '05 Crystal Grey Metallic WRX Sport Wagon
I like option 2...that's apparently what they want too. The only problem is then Iraq and Iran really will have WMDs in the form of intercontinental nucs...
12-01-2006, 04:14 PM
#3
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: ...
Posts: 193
Car Info: ...
Originally Posted by http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/printer_120205E.shtml
"In the early 1980s, Iran came to be viewed in Washington as public enemy Number 2, right after the Soviet Union. In the Cold War, the United States had viewed Iran as a key asset, and in 1953 the CIA overthrew the populist government of elected Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh, which had broken with the country's monarch. The US put the autocratic Mohammad Reza Shah back on his throne, building him up as an absolute monarch with a well-trained secret police and jails overflowing with prisoners of conscience. "
I'd bet biggest gun's the Iranian's have hang off the sides of this guy...
http://www.iranfocus.com/modules/new...p?storyid=9379
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HellaDumb
Teh Politics Forum
6
03-09-2006 05:43 PM
gpatmac
Teh Politics Forum
68
01-24-2005 01:39 PM
Salty
Teh Politics Forum
6
09-23-2004 06:00 PM
Salty
Teh Politics Forum
4
09-22-2004 09:45 PM