How's this work out for you guys?
Thread Starter
250,000-mile Club President
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,770
From: Bizerkeley
Car Info: MBP 02 WRX wagon
How's this work out for you guys?
http://democrats.senate.gov/ss/calc.html#
the social insecurity plan that buchcheney inc. is proposing looks like it'll cost me a good 4G per year after retirement, how's it figure for the rest of you guys?
the social insecurity plan that buchcheney inc. is proposing looks like it'll cost me a good 4G per year after retirement, how's it figure for the rest of you guys?
VIP Member
iTrader: (14)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,675
From: Wherever Sucks the Most
Car Info: 2003 WRX, 2008 Camry
This calculator is misleading. It makes it seem like the return for Bush's column is the final return. I'm pretty damn sure that's the return guaranteed if you didn't touch your earnings.
Does this calculator factor in 2018 till 2042 and beyond? I didn't think so. I typed 2002 as my DOB and 80k. Assuming this is what my nephew could make, he'd have to be among the ~70% of guaranteed people for Social Security by 2042 and would have to retire by the time he was 39 (at which point he probably wouldn't be able to touch his money anyways). The calculator didn't have any pop-up window that made this clear whatsoever. This isn't going to happen unless he's a pro-athlete or Real Estate guru. At which point Social Security wouldn't be a very big factor he'd be losing sleep over anyways. This is why the final, guaranteed return for the Bush margin is lower in that calculator. Something has to give in order equally distribute funds past 2042.
My point is that the current system blows and will inevitably crumble. The current plan is not as promising as this calculator and supporting Dems make it out to be. Not in the slightest. If anything, the skies the limit in regard to overall net return for Bush's plan. This calculator obviously fails to mention the infinite possibilities with the money you're allowed to invest. Unfortunately for some, luck has the tendency to swing both ways in regard to investing which seems to be the only major downside to Bush's plan.
I'll have to tip my hat to social-dems on this one... they were on the right track regarding Social Security but they failed to cover all their bases in providing a good, long term plan. Obviously. It's just too bad that they didn't implement a plan that allowed people to have their cake and eat it too.
I think the Bush plan is slightly better in the respect because it allows you to do this. The problem is that Social Security was designed in order to provide guranteed money. Money that you didn't have to worry about till it was time to collect. You can still do this, but as the calculator shows, your cut will be smaller as a result of inactivity. The only amount of interest anyone has ever had in Social Security is how much of their pay is going toward it and if they're going to ever see it.
My only true long-term concern is carelessness, laziness and the combination of the two from certain individuals. I can picture more people on the streets years from now but I can also see more people driving expensive cars past them.
Does this calculator factor in 2018 till 2042 and beyond? I didn't think so. I typed 2002 as my DOB and 80k. Assuming this is what my nephew could make, he'd have to be among the ~70% of guaranteed people for Social Security by 2042 and would have to retire by the time he was 39 (at which point he probably wouldn't be able to touch his money anyways). The calculator didn't have any pop-up window that made this clear whatsoever. This isn't going to happen unless he's a pro-athlete or Real Estate guru. At which point Social Security wouldn't be a very big factor he'd be losing sleep over anyways. This is why the final, guaranteed return for the Bush margin is lower in that calculator. Something has to give in order equally distribute funds past 2042.
My point is that the current system blows and will inevitably crumble. The current plan is not as promising as this calculator and supporting Dems make it out to be. Not in the slightest. If anything, the skies the limit in regard to overall net return for Bush's plan. This calculator obviously fails to mention the infinite possibilities with the money you're allowed to invest. Unfortunately for some, luck has the tendency to swing both ways in regard to investing which seems to be the only major downside to Bush's plan.
I'll have to tip my hat to social-dems on this one... they were on the right track regarding Social Security but they failed to cover all their bases in providing a good, long term plan. Obviously. It's just too bad that they didn't implement a plan that allowed people to have their cake and eat it too.
I think the Bush plan is slightly better in the respect because it allows you to do this. The problem is that Social Security was designed in order to provide guranteed money. Money that you didn't have to worry about till it was time to collect. You can still do this, but as the calculator shows, your cut will be smaller as a result of inactivity. The only amount of interest anyone has ever had in Social Security is how much of their pay is going toward it and if they're going to ever see it.
My only true long-term concern is carelessness, laziness and the combination of the two from certain individuals. I can picture more people on the streets years from now but I can also see more people driving expensive cars past them.
Last edited by Salty; Mar 5, 2005 at 09:30 AM.
Dirty Redhead
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 7,204
From: Commuting? I don't know what that means anymore.
Car Info: 05 WRX Wagon (Crystal Gray)
Salty,
You mention the limitless possibilites for investing but aren't you limited to certain avenues of investment that bush's social security plan chooses for you?
You mention the limitless possibilites for investing but aren't you limited to certain avenues of investment that bush's social security plan chooses for you?
VIP Member
iTrader: (14)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,675
From: Wherever Sucks the Most
Car Info: 2003 WRX, 2008 Camry
Originally Posted by ericdared81
Salty,
You mention the limitless possibilites for investing but aren't you limited to certain avenues of investment that bush's social security plan chooses for you?
You mention the limitless possibilites for investing but aren't you limited to certain avenues of investment that bush's social security plan chooses for you?
The accounts are voluntary. If you don't invest the money then the calculator psoper is drooling over would be correct. Initially, participation would be phased in over three years according to age gaps. Those born from 1950 to 1965 could open accounts in the first year. Those born from 1950 to 1978 could open accounts in the second year. And anyone born after 1950 could opt for an account in the 3rd year and beyond (2011 by then I think).
The platform is based on the popular TSP 401(k) plan that many private companies and the Federal govt. offers it's employees and retirees. It's popular because it's proven effective and because administration fees are very low. There are limitations based on which avenue you want to take (Common stock fund, Small-cap fund, Government securities investment fund, Fixed-income index fund, International fund). For example, you take avenue #1 which opens the door to a few other avenues within that investing sector. Then the funds are diversified automatically into whichever option you took in order to reduce risk and investing failure. By diversifying funds you technically set-up a security blanket by not putting all your eggs into one basket. It also gives you time to make-up for any loss that's happened or is expected to happen. There's also going to be another security blanket called a life-cycle fund. It's a more conservative market targeted towards those nearing retirement.
I am not sure if you can access the life-cycle fund as a new investor but it would be ideal for skeptics.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
brucelee
Bay Area
87
Oct 20, 2008 03:21 PM
LifePlaza
SoCal
272
Jul 15, 2007 10:22 AM
BoxerRumble
Bay Area
67
May 23, 2005 10:06 PM
IS2Scooby
Hawaii
15
Jun 3, 2003 12:50 PM



