STi Countdown Perfect place to engage in hot discussions about the upcoming WRX STi. Please post all US WRX STi questions, answers, speculations here

Sti 2004 2.5!!!!!!

 
Old Jan 14, 2003 | 11:53 AM
  #16  
josh's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 998
From: Moraga, CA
Car Info: 2016 CWP WRX
420wrx

than why is everyone building 2.4-2.5l motors? that is where the power is. and we are not getting a v-8. just a half a liter more. gas milage is not going to suffer that much. if it doers it os only due to a driver with a lead foot.

i highly dought Subaru would max a motor out a 300hp. that is stupid engineering. just as any other Sti motor, it will be beefed up where it needs to be, and be a stronger motor period than the 2.0. mod for mod, the 2.5 will make more power. you have to compare apples to apples and oranges to oranges. not apples to oranges. if you are going to dump $5k into a built ej20, i am willing to bet the ej25 will still make more power if you dump the same $5k into it.

i can understand you logic, but i really don't think it applies to this motor, and where subaru is going with the car.

josh
Old Jan 15, 2003 | 10:56 AM
  #27  
josh's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 998
From: Moraga, CA
Car Info: 2016 CWP WRX
not sure on the rally thing 420.

i am not very familiar wth the pro rally rules. it would kinda suck if they couldnt.

anyone else know the rules for US pro rally?

josh
Old Jan 15, 2003 | 03:19 PM
  #29  
samurai's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,682
From: Union City/San Diego, CA USA
Car Info: The Thundercougarfalconbird
Personally, I like Subaru's idea of using a 2.5 instead of a 2.0. For anybody who has driven a WRX 2.0l turbo, how is the turbo-lag? That is the thing that I am curious about. If the turbo lag is noticeable, it tells me that the 2.0 doesn't have enough low end oomph. I think that the 2.5 will "fill in the blanks" nicely. With the AVCS on there, I am also hoping for high-end as well.

I'm gonna stand in line now and wait for one before they start marking up the price. Anybody in the SF bay talk to any dealers to get quotes? I have been hearing anything from 32k MSRP to 35k with the markup on MSRP.

Tim
Old Jan 15, 2003 | 03:26 PM
  #30  
samurai's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,682
From: Union City/San Diego, CA USA
Car Info: The Thundercougarfalconbird
Originally posted by CLD_FSN
Hey, supras are only 3.0L and they kick most cars rear ends with some work....

-CLD_FSN
\

Sorry for the double, but since I just saw the above, I had to comment. Supras in the JGTC (Japan Grand Touring Championship) use 4 cyl- engines intead of 6s and they still won this years championship against 6cyl Skylines, and 6cyl NSXs (though the NSXs are their rivals of late). They do use a weight "penalty" system which gives a greater advantage to cars that utilize HP:weight ratio better and the Supra has a 4cyl engine that is shoved back towards the driver.

Tim

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:56 AM.