My last "Iraq didn't have weapon of mass destruction".
My last "Iraq didn't have weapon of mass destruction".
Because of this excuse, many Americans died, USA pissed off even more people, and our scal bobby is in Kuwait.
It's good to free people and stuff, but if we keep doing this freedom thing then we are sort of like taking over the world.
It's good to free people and stuff, but if we keep doing this freedom thing then we are sort of like taking over the world.
i take it louis is being an effective worker today lol. but yea i think its wrong we went in, but hey America has screwed up alot of other countries so this isn't new to me
We better watch the making the whole world a free democracy thing.
Just imagine if all the muslims of the world were to say ok "we all want a democracy" and then vote the whole world to Islam.
Just imagine if all the muslims of the world were to say ok "we all want a democracy" and then vote the whole world to Islam.
Last edited by Ichinobu; Sep 11, 2007 at 12:26 AM.
Opinions…take it from a Political Science Major:
Opinion 1: It is in Americas best interest to “come to the rescue” so that we can possibly prevent any future attacks and save ourselves the “bad image” in that country.
Opinion 2: It in the Republicans best interest to “baby kill” and “pillage” due to “terror”…the “terror” of losing a huge opportunity in the oil business.
Opinion 3: It isn’t in America’s interest to support a “Bush war”, only to support our troops.
There is a lot more where that came from…
Opinion 1: It is in Americas best interest to “come to the rescue” so that we can possibly prevent any future attacks and save ourselves the “bad image” in that country.
Opinion 2: It in the Republicans best interest to “baby kill” and “pillage” due to “terror”…the “terror” of losing a huge opportunity in the oil business.
Opinion 3: It isn’t in America’s interest to support a “Bush war”, only to support our troops.
There is a lot more where that came from…
Here's a good quote for you to read.
Originally Posted by Future Speaker of the House
Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process. The responsibility of the United States in this conflict is to eliminate weapons of mass destructionn, to minimize the danger to our troops and to diminish the suffering of the Iraqi people.
- Nancy Pelosi, December 16, 1998
- Nancy Pelosi, December 16, 1998
The Whole Movie
He owns this debate. It's 10 minutes, but it's GOOD.
Here's another video. This one of Al Gore criticizing Bush, Sr. of not doing something about Iraq.
Al Gore at the Center for National Policy function, September 29, 1992
Al Gore at the Center for National Policy function, September 29, 1992
Originally Posted by Al Gore, 1992 @ min: 3:15
Bush deserves heavy blame for intentionally concealing from the American people, the clear nature of Saddam Husein and his regime, and convincing himself that friendly relations with such a monster would be possible; and for persisting in this effort far, far beyond the point of falling. Throughout this period, Saddam's atrocities continued. In March of 1988, Saddam used poison gas on the Kurdish town of Holabja -- brutally murdering some 5,000 innocent men, women, and children. And none of us can ever forget the pictures of their bodies; of parents trying to shield their infants, even in death, that were in our news media and around the world.
What's sad is now it is the same people who are complaining that we shouldn't be there....We should have finished the job the first time around. Swarsikoff (sorry about the spelling) wanted to go all the way to Baghdad in the first war. The Democrats are the ones that said we were only there to remove the Iraqis from Kuwait...


