Saw one the other day, had to stop and take some pics. Sorry they're crappy, I had to use my camera phone.









They look good. I'd contimplate one if they weren't priced to close to the vette.

 

they look alright, but they are piles of sheet

Over Priced... Slow... and weights over 4,000lbs... and why the **** does that turd wagon have IRS, there is no way a 4,000lb car is gunna turn...

 

great motor. horrible everything else.

 

the motor is a great "idea"... lets see if it holds together better then the first generation version of it did in the ford GT... if it does hold together i will give that car a little more props then i do now(which is basically zero). but the fact that everyone who owns a ford gt slogan is "The car is amazing... when it runs"... is not my ideal car haha and how jeremy clarkson said he can drive TO a place, but can't make it back with his ford gt lol

 

UMMM... the GT500's run a solid axle. They're not IRS. Yes, they are way too heavy, but have the power to make up for it. You just have to respect a bolt-on 10 second street car. I'd buy one if I had the coin.

 

10 Second? You mean more like a 12.8 (according to R&T). 10 sec. maybe with the Roush blower. A stock Corvette Z51 has a better 60 time, by a tenth.

For S***'s and Giggles:
Times and speed:
Car........60MPH........1/4 mile. . . . . . .Price
Z51..........4.5........12.8 @ 112.5. . . .$44,170
GT500......4.6........12.8 @ 113.2. . . .$40,930
Z06..........3.6........12.0 @ 121.0. . . .$64,890

 

Read what I stated, please... 10 second BOLT ON car. And besides, what I really meant to say was 9 second car.

http://videos.streetfire.net/search/...9000e17ccb.htm

I rest my case.

 

True, didn't read that part. But I'd still take a vette

 

I won't bag on you for your personal preference.

Did you catch that video I posted yet? That car is ridiculous... CAI, pulley, full exhaust, and a custom tune: 10.46... add a 75 shot of spray and you've got high 9's. It'll really be amazing when they strap on the new 2.8 Kenne Bell. I bet it'll run 9's without the spray.

 

lol its still a ford :P

 

I guess Pontiac Grand Am drivers just have no taste.

 

hmm basic bolt ons....


2.6" Pulley... JLT Carbon Fiber CAI... 4.10 Gears.... Stage 1 Steigemeier port... off road x pipe... borla cat back... 4" aluminum drive shaft... bmr suspension... and 325/45 Drag Radials, and tuned with nitrous...

A bone stock zo6 with slicks did 10's, no mods period

this camaro did 10.9's No nitrous... basic bolt ons... as in more basic then the ones u just posted... no power adders while the shelby had TWO
http://ls1tech.com/forums/showpost.p...5&postcount=39

Scott ran 10.8's with basic bolt ons and nitrous through a 6 speed... if i searched harder I could find camaro's in the 9's with stock motor basic bolt ons with nitrous...

am I really suppose to be impressed by that 106k car??


M-ust
U-se
S-uperchargers or
T-urbos
A-gainst
N-aturally Aspirated
G-M's

 

9's are a long ways from high 10's and I'm impressed with anything that runs 10's, let alone 9's. I don't care who makes it. I find it amazing that something that weighs that damn much can move that fast.

BTW, need I remind you that your Camaro was such a great car that they quit making it and are only bringing it back in a couple years because the Mustangs are selling faster than ever. I'm sorry. I like my fast cars without the mullet.

 

actually.. that car is way down the road at this point.. I have no car currently

so there.. HA

oh wai ...

 

I do believe the reason the Camaro was discontinued was that for a few thousand more then the top of the line SS, you can purchase a Corvette

the car needed to be redesigned to be a lot cheaper then the flagship bowtie performance car.