It's Wednesday (in 9 minutes)

Closed Thread Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Nov 8, 2006 | 10:31 PM

#196

T-Will

Registered User

iTrader: (3)

Joined: Feb 2005

Posts: 10,232

From: Front pleated TWill pants...

Car Info: 2004 PSM WRX

Quote:

Originally Posted by sybir

Becuase it's not their body or their life?

If the daughter is under 18 then the parents are responsible for their daughter.

Nov 8, 2006 | 10:49 PM

#197

Kevin M

Registered User

iTrader: (12)

Joined: Nov 2002

Posts: 18,369

From: Reno, NV

Car Info: 1993/2000/2001 GF4 mostly red

Quote:

Originally Posted by T-Will

If the daughter is under 18 then the parents are responsible for their daughter.

The problem is, that law won't really prevent abortions, which is the intent. Teenage girls who accidentally get pregnant and don't want their parents finding out are going to find ways around this- usually by going to shady docs who will bend the law. More importantly, the Proposition is probably unconstitutional under Roe v. Wade- right to privacy is the reason cited for not allowing abortion bans in the first place.

Nov 8, 2006 | 10:53 PM

#198

Kevin M

Registered User

iTrader: (12)

Joined: Nov 2002

Posts: 18,369

From: Reno, NV

Car Info: 1993/2000/2001 GF4 mostly red

Quote:

Originally Posted by Double Phister

no doubt they are dirty pervs. I just don't like where the trap is going. If this keeps up then we'll get busted for intent to speed or some such nonsense.

Precrime from that Tom Cruise movie comes to mind.

No, if the cops went to the perv's house and busted him for online conversations, you would have a point. But these guys are walking into a house expecting to find a lone teenage girl (or boy) who they then EXPECT to have sex with. If you walk into a bank with a loaded gun, do you have to shoot it before you get arrested for attempted armed robbery?

Nov 9, 2006 | 12:26 AM

#199

GT35 STI

Troll

iTrader: (6)

Joined: Jan 2006

Posts: 15,877

From: In SoggyNoodles Low Rise Pants

Car Info: 2008 Legacy Spec-B

Quote:

Originally Posted by Double Phister

I can't beleive 83 (sex offender) passed.

Some 18 year old kid who has sex with her 17 year old boyfriend now has to wear a GPS device for the rest of her life.

Except for one small problem... the california law states it has to be 2 1/2 years difference before you can be convicted as a registered sex offender....