!!!Official!!!! - Dyno Day - Saturday July 17th

Closed Thread Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Jul 20, 2004 | 06:43 PM

#121

Kevin M

Registered User

iTrader: (12)

Joined: Nov 2002

Posts: 18,369

From: Reno, NV

Car Info: 1993/2000/2001 GF4 mostly red

Quote:

Originally Posted by oct1285

is it true mustang dynos usually reads more conservativly then a dynojet?

Yes.

Jul 20, 2004 | 07:07 PM

#122

Egan

Registered User

iTrader: (14)

Joined: Nov 2001

Posts: 14,221

From: Peoples Republik of Kalifornia

Car Info: 05 H2 SUT, 45 GPW, 10 Murano, 13 Boss 302

For those who did not make it to elementary school (on this forum, anything is possible):

The symbol "<" means "less than", therefore, ergo, hitherto:
Mustangs read lower than Dyno Dynamics which read lower than DynoJets

Jul 20, 2004 | 11:23 PM

#123

UK n00b

VIP Member

iTrader: (3)

Joined: Aug 2003

Posts: 2,539

From: Farnborough, Hants

Car Info: the blue bucket

Except in the case of the Silver car I brought on Saturday which put down more on less boost on the Mustang (259 @ 16psi) and made 253 @ 17psi on the Dyno Dynamics. Not that this concludes anything given environmental conditions and so on but still makes things seem fairly close.

Does anyone have any concrete data on the Mustang being lower than the Dyno Dynamics? I know the dynojet is higher.

Mike

Jul 20, 2004 | 11:56 PM

#124

S-Squared

Guest

Posts: n/a

The only real data I have is based on Shiv's dyno spreadsheet, and the fact that on average a stock wrx on my dyno puts down about 155 and on Vishnu's it puts down about 165, fairly close in the world of dyno's though.

-Nate

Jul 21, 2004 | 12:19 AM

#125

jewpac42

I don't need more cowbell dammit!

iTrader: (5)

Joined: Jun 2003

Posts: 3,203

From: Equally as important as Walter

Car Info: E82

Quote:

Originally Posted by BAN SUVS

Uhhhh... right. And Dynojets read higher than DynoDynamics which read higher than Mustang dynos. And I didn't need no stinkin' Aerospace Engineering degree to figure that out.

LOL

Jul 21, 2004 | 11:58 AM

#126

AWD OWNZ U

Registered User

Joined: Nov 2002

Posts: 706

From: Atlanta, GA

Car Info: 2000 2.5RS

Quote:

Originally Posted by BAN SUVS

Uhhhh... right. And Dynojets read higher than DynoDynamics which read higher than Mustang dynos. And I didn't need no stinkin' Aerospace Engineering degree to figure that out.

haha, I just meant normally you'd see it written like this...

Dyno Jet > Dyno Dynamics > Mustang

Jul 21, 2004 | 01:07 PM

#127

RussB

VIP Member

iTrader: (2)

Joined: Apr 2003

Posts: 9,351

From: pompous douchebag

Car Info: $200,000 sports car

Quote:

Originally Posted by Egan

I think the progression goes like this:

Mustang < Dyno Dynamics < Dyno Jet

Egan ranks them as:
Mustang is less than Dyno Dynamics is less than Dyno Jet.

Quote:

Originally Posted by AWD OWNZ U

haha, I just meant normally you'd see it written like this...

Dyno Jet > Dyno Dynamics > Mustang

you rank them as:
Dyno Jet is greater than Dyno Dynamics is greater than Mustang.

same thing.

Jul 21, 2004 | 01:54 PM

#128

AWD OWNZ U

Registered User

Joined: Nov 2002

Posts: 706

From: Atlanta, GA

Car Info: 2000 2.5RS

I'm aware that it's the same thing. *sigh* nm

Jul 31, 2004 | 01:29 PM

#129

Long_Travel_WRX

VIP Member

iTrader: (2)

Joined: Mar 2004

Posts: 983

From: FLATLINE__________FAB

Car Info: stock 04 wrx sedan

hate to bring this thread back from the dead but didnt think this question was important enought to start a new thread, what does a stock sti dyno @S^2